Having more than one camera for more than one purpose!
Jan 20, 2019 02:57:50 #
julian.gang wrote:
Is having more than one camera for different purposes a good idea?...Julian
I think so, I use a couple DSLR's for most shooting, but I do a lot of film shooting as well, so I use a few SLR's there as well, MF cameras also, I too have a few movie cameras (which I sadly hardly use anymore, because of cost)!
Jan 20, 2019 05:14:38 #
jdubu
Loc: San Jose, CA
I don't know if it's a good idea or not, but I do keep my camera bodies for various uses. My DSLR's are used for various types of shooting. My original Canon 10D was given to a friend as a backup camera on a once in a lifetime trip. I actually loaned it, but never got it back.
I use a 40D for continuous time lapse shooting because it's so old, I don't worry about running a high shutter count. I have an older Rebel IR converted for fun and am considering having my 7D converted. The 7DII is for capturing action with it's burst frame rate and my 5DIII is my main body for clients and pleasure. I picked up a couple of 5DII's for backup bodies and as a working second body with different lens. I don't have the 5DIV, the III fills my needs and my photography funds usually goes towards accessories that speed my work and better glass.
I would only consider upgrading my cameras if the tech makes a tremendous leap that helps my photography or one of the 5D's goes south.
I use a 40D for continuous time lapse shooting because it's so old, I don't worry about running a high shutter count. I have an older Rebel IR converted for fun and am considering having my 7D converted. The 7DII is for capturing action with it's burst frame rate and my 5DIII is my main body for clients and pleasure. I picked up a couple of 5DII's for backup bodies and as a working second body with different lens. I don't have the 5DIV, the III fills my needs and my photography funds usually goes towards accessories that speed my work and better glass.
I would only consider upgrading my cameras if the tech makes a tremendous leap that helps my photography or one of the 5D's goes south.
Jan 20, 2019 05:20:29 #
wdross
Loc: Castle Rock, Colorado
julian.gang wrote:
Is having more than one camera for different purposes a good idea?...Julian
It always depends on the circumstances. It will cost more money. But if you end up making more money than you spend, it makes sense. If you have discretionary money for extra things and it would allow you the opportunity to shoot different lenses very quickly, it is up to your personal taste if it is worth it. During the film days I had more than one body, usually for a second film speed, but it took a while before I got my second body. I will eventually get myself a second digital body, but don't feel the pressing need to from my present shooting requirements. Once I start buying some prime lenses, I will probably buy another body. My type of shooting at that time will require faster changes than changing out lenses will allow.
Jan 20, 2019 05:45:01 #
I have always had at least two cameras, one with telephoto and one normal. You just neve know what may be around the corner. As a CSI =toger, I always needed more than one.
Jan 20, 2019 05:58:45 #
catchlight..
Loc: Wisconsin USA- Halden Norway
Two 5D MK4's to reduce the time and wear of repeated lens changes.
I am contemplating a 1DX MKII but havent convinced myself to spend the money yet, but the low light and speed of the 1DX is something I am considering.
I am contemplating a 1DX MKII but havent convinced myself to spend the money yet, but the low light and speed of the 1DX is something I am considering.
Jan 20, 2019 06:13:02 #
Well Yes for me. T3i for shows and events where I want multiple lens, XS50 when I can't carry multiple lens but still want the range available. Then there my G16 I use in my Car, Truck, Motorcycles when I just want to grab, turn on, aim and shoot with one hand while the vehicle is moving < perhaps 70% of my picture taking while roaming about doing road therapy. What helps is all one manufactory so the menus fairly close.
Jan 20, 2019 06:21:30 #
miked46
Loc: Winter Springs, Florida
I have 2 bodies, but this is so, I do not have any trouble while on vacation.
Jan 20, 2019 06:33:36 #
My go to lens is a Nikon 28-300, but if I’m shooting birde I take my 50-500. I put that lens on my second camera for 2 reasons I’m always ready and I don’t like to change lenses all the time bepending on the situation.
Jan 20, 2019 06:35:08 #
julian.gang wrote:
Is having more than one camera for different purposes a good idea?...Julian
Sort of. I'll often go out with a tele lens on my right shoulder and a W/A on my left - each on a Nikon DSLR. I have several small and smaller cameras for when I need something unobtrusive that will fit into a pocket.
Jan 20, 2019 06:52:20 #
I have three cameras. They are all Sonys' so the menus are very similar. Rx10IV for reach, Rx100VI for compactness and A6300 for lens versatility and Improved images. I couldn't handle learning different menus.
Jan 20, 2019 06:56:34 #
julian.gang wrote:
Is having more than one camera for different purposes a good idea?...Julian
Yes. I often have 3-4 cameras I use on a regular basis. I recently sold off a D3S because I found myself not using it as much - but few cameras since could equal it's low light/high ISO performance. I use D800, D810 and a Sony RX10M4, and I keep a lightly used D70S around for IR conversion when I get around to it. What I don't do is keep cameras that use interchangeable lenses from different mfgrs.
Jan 20, 2019 07:03:12 #
LXK0930
Loc: Souh Jersey
I can not imagine any serious photo enthusiast not having more than one camera.
I am a rank amateur, who takes photos to capture memories. I firmly subscribe to the "good enough" theory, so do not need the latest/greatest/sharpest equipment.
I use a modest dslr outfit (Canon t2i with kit lens, 18-250 Tamron, and 50mm) for most outings. I also have a small P&S (Canon S95) for times when I am unable to tote the dslr or don't want to be conspicuous. I also have a Fuji F500 P&S for times when I need more "reach" than my S95 provides. All cameras were purchased used for a total cost of about $350.
I find that these cameras cover 100% of my needs.
I am a rank amateur, who takes photos to capture memories. I firmly subscribe to the "good enough" theory, so do not need the latest/greatest/sharpest equipment.
I use a modest dslr outfit (Canon t2i with kit lens, 18-250 Tamron, and 50mm) for most outings. I also have a small P&S (Canon S95) for times when I am unable to tote the dslr or don't want to be conspicuous. I also have a Fuji F500 P&S for times when I need more "reach" than my S95 provides. All cameras were purchased used for a total cost of about $350.
I find that these cameras cover 100% of my needs.
Jan 20, 2019 07:06:10 #
Having a smaller camera while vacationing/traveling can be advantageous. Less to worry about, inconspicuous and more enjoyably because it's then more about the trip. Much of your choice will be budgeting and your priorities.
Jan 20, 2019 07:09:24 #
billnikon
Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
julian.gang wrote:
Is having more than one camera for different purposes a good idea?...Julian
I personally use my D850 for landscape photography and I usually use my Nikon 16-35 mm f4 or my Nikon 24-120 f4 because they have the same filter size for my assortment of NiSi and Lee filters. I usually fill the frame with what the final image will look like. I usually print to a 20X30 print and like the megapixel count of the D850.
I use the Nikon D500 with the Nikon 200-500 lens for wildlife photography. I can put more EFFECTIVE MEGAPIXELS on the subject than I can with a full frame if both are used at the same distance from the subject. I also plan on using the new Nikon 500 5.6 FL lens on this body. I also use the 10 frames a second with this body and it is essential in getting that perfect moment I am looking for.
My third set of camera's are used for travel. I use the Sony RX100 II and the HX90V in belt pouches. The HX90V has a pop up view finder and a 24-720 mm Zeiss lens. Travel right, travel lite.
Jan 20, 2019 07:14:46 #
picking up on several previous points - I have 2 complementary camera bodies.
A full frame EOS 6DII - because I really like (but don't necessarily need) the IQ I can achieve with it.
An EOS M5 - because with an adapter it uses the same lenses; has a x1.6 extra range on tele lenses and a fast burst rate; is a small, lightweight backup for the FF when on extended trips.
I also have a couple of extra M lenses for the M5 so it is a compact, self contained travel kit if I need to travel light
and an action cam solely for wet/ dirty/ sandy work 'cos I don't want to risk my main gear.
A full frame EOS 6DII - because I really like (but don't necessarily need) the IQ I can achieve with it.
An EOS M5 - because with an adapter it uses the same lenses; has a x1.6 extra range on tele lenses and a fast burst rate; is a small, lightweight backup for the FF when on extended trips.
I also have a couple of extra M lenses for the M5 so it is a compact, self contained travel kit if I need to travel light
and an action cam solely for wet/ dirty/ sandy work 'cos I don't want to risk my main gear.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.