Having more than one camera for more than one purpose!
Is having more than one camera for different purposes a good idea?...Julian
For me
no. I'm having enough trouble mastering the one I have. For those with greater skill I can see where more than on camera would be advantageous.
olemikey
Loc: 6 mile creek, Spacecoast Florida
Yes, if you have more than one, but it isn't a necessity! I do some remote radio controlled work with several of my bodies, that is all they do, a they stay setup for that. I have several that are used for regular photo action of all sorts, and that is all they do.....
Julian:
Over the years I've had lots of cameras - still do - But when it comes to taking photos - It's one & only one camera that is used. However I'm sure lots of folks will tell you otherwise. All my film cameras are boxed-up & retired -- As for digital so far I've given those away
julian.gang wrote:
Is having more than one camera for different purposes a good idea?...Julian
YES, If you can handle the differences in function from one system to the next. The decision to have more than one system is based on NEED and BUDGET and range of SUBJECTS you intend to photograph.
I wouldn't try to photograph pro sports with my Micro 4/3 mirrorless. But I wouldn't use a dSLR for video these days, either. (That is so 2008!)
Often, the solution is to buy what you will use the most, and rent the rest, only when needed...
It is a convenience and also serves as a back up, particularly when traveling for extended photo ops. I often use long focal length lenses for wildlife and have the second camera set up for those unexpected opportunities where a shorter lens is quickly needed.
burkphoto hit the nail on the head. Need, Budget and Subjects change person to person and drive the behavior. I think of it like cars, I have an SUV to tow my boat and trailer but my sports car is not made for that type of activity. I have a Cannon pocket camera that I toss in a coat pocket when riding a ATV or working around the farm and use the DSLR if I have business photos or group photos for church etc.
That said, some people only need 1 camera and it serves them well.
Or..... Why get rid of it, if it still works and has no value. My Rebel Ti1 (12 megpix.) is worth next to nothing soo I set it up as a macro cam. Then the 7d, not worthless but old (like me). Great as long reach for , well long reach. Its in my backpack with a 2x mounted behind a 400 prime ready to mount on the tripod.
I don’t have 2 of the same kind of cameras, but different kinds. I have a water proof point and shoot for snorkeling and swimming (Nikon AW100). My DSLR for most other things and I have a Nikon 1 for times that My DSLR is too bulky. They are all Nikons and while the controls are different, they are close enough to each other not to run into too many problems.
I primarily use my T1i for most shots; My H1 focuses down to 2cm, which comes in very handy; My cell phone I use for geotagging the T1i photo location and panos.
Yes and if you can afford it. I have a Sony a7s for low light and MilkyWay shots. A Sony a99ii for most of my nature work. A Sony a6000 for travel. A Sony HX400 for airline travel (packing light). A Fujifilm X-A3 for digital B&W (can't afford the Leica Mono even a used one). A Canon PowerShot A3300IS for fishing, boating, and river rafting (no loss if it goes for a swim). A Mamiya 645 for 120 B&W film. A 4x5 for B&W film Nature work. Not counting several older 35mm film cameras. Its like cars....each has it's purposes. Could one camera do it all....extreamly well....no. Just like you wouldn't buy a 22cal rim fire rifle to hunt elk. Or a 30-06 to hunt quail. Each has it's uses. All but one of those cameras was purchased as used equipment. Yes I use them all, I teach photography.
Thanks everybody for the replies, I have a Sony DSC-F707 that was purchased about 6 or 7 years ago. Then I purchased a Sony DSC-HX400v. I love Zeiss lenses!...Julian
julian.gang wrote:
Thanks everybody for the replies, I have a Sony DSC-F707 that was purchased about 6 or 7 years ago. Then I purchased a Sony DSC-HX400v. I love Zeiss lenses!...Julian
That is why I sold my Canon SX50 and purchased the Sony HX-400v
heard of one guy that has three camera bags with gear inside for different shooting situations. Same camera but different lenses etc. For instance the bag for shooting sports has two camera bodies and his lenses for sports. If he uses the same lens for different situations, he has more than one of that lens.
ORpilot wrote:
Yes and if you can afford it. I have a Sony a7s for low light and MilkyWay shots. A Sony a99ii for most of my nature work. A Sony a6000 for travel. A Sony HX400 for airline travel (packing light). A Fujifilm X-A3 for digital B&W (can't afford the Leica Mono even a used one). A Canon PowerShot A3300IS for fishing, boating, and river rafting (no loss if it goes for a swim). A Mamiya 645 for 120 B&W film. A 4x5 for B&W film Nature work. Not counting several older 35mm film cameras. Its like cars....each has it's purposes. Could one camera do it all....extreamly well....no. Just like you wouldn't buy a 22cal rim fire rifle to hunt elk. Or a 30-06 to hunt quail. Each has it's uses. All but one of those cameras was purchased as used equipment. Yes I use them all, I teach photography.
Yes and if you can afford it. I have a Sony a7s fo... (
show quote)
I have 2 Sony cameras, the 707 and the HX400v, they both have Zeiss lenses...Julian
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.