Jdub82,
I have also been looking at the Tamron 18-400 and 150-600 as options. I am not sure if the 150-600 works with a C sensor or not. Still trying to find that data.
Thanks for recommending the options.
jdub82
Loc: Northern California
Keith S wrote:
Jdub82,
I have also been looking at the Tamron 18-400 and 150-600 as options. I am not sure if the 150-600 works with a C sensor or not. Still trying to find that data.
Thanks for recommending the options.
Yes, the 150-600 Tamron for Canon will work with your APS-C camera. A Canon full frame lens will also work on a crop sensor Canon camera.
JimH123,
For the most part here in the Puget Sound (Seattle area). We see them sort of slow cruising which makes it a bit easier. I do like your suggestion of zooming in after finding the target. Sure is something to think about.
Thanks.
Keith S wrote:
Jdub82,
I have also been looking at the Tamron 18-400 and 150-600 as options. I am not sure if the 150-600 works with a C sensor or not. Still trying to find that data.
Thanks for recommending the options.
Yes, there is no problem with the 150-600 on a crop sensor. I use the 150-600 on both my full frame and my APS-C with no problems.
PixelStan77 wrote:
Keith the issue is the camera. You can get a 18-270 but it is not worth the money to go to 270.
Consider the investment of a Nikon D500 with a Nikon 200-500 lens.
Ah yes, a Nikon owner telling the Canon Rebel owner the problem isn't the lens, it's the camera. I wonder if the response would have been the same if the OP had a 60D. Get a Nikon D500 is the solution. NO, that's a bad expensive solution. With an increase of less than 3 megapixels, I don't really see how this is a good solution. So, a D500 at roughly $1600 and a Nikkor 200-500 at roughly $1300 comes to roughly $3000 with tax and or shipping. A Sigma 150-600 Contemporary lens is roughly $1000 with tax and shipping and it will work just fine on a EOS T3i; a savings of around $2000 over the Nikon solution. Which solution makes better sense?!
Stoshik wrote:
Hello~
I'm really sorry to bring this up...
I hate being pedantic, but you've gotten in to some bad writing habits over the years. And it's not a typo if you repeat it...
Please:When to Use Lense (Never)
What does lense mean? Nothing.
Lense is a misspelling of lens. It rarely appears in edited writing and should be avoided across the board.
Almost no one uses lense in published books.
Lense and lens are two spellings that refer to the same word, only one of which is considered correct.
Lens is the correct spelling.
Lense is a misspelling that probably arises from the plural spelling of lens:
Since lense is a spelling error, think of the extra E in lense as standing for the word error.
My apologies for being critical, not of you, but your spelling.
S
Hello~ br I'm really sorry to bring this up... br ... (
show quote)
Wasn't that real fracking special, and helpful also.
joer
Loc: Colorado/Illinois
Keith S wrote:
Hello HOG members.
My wife and I have become addicted to chasing the Orca whales around Puget Sound these days. The most beautiful thing I have seen in a long while. My problem is I only have a 55/250 canon lense on my EOS t2i. I most certainly need more power to get better shots from long distance. I am not going to change the camera just want a lense to reach out and touch those wonderful creatures.
I know there are many members that can help me upgrade my lense for this. Any and all suggestion are welcome.
Thank you in advance for all your assistance.
Hello HOG members. br br My wife and I have beco... (
show quote)
You may want to consider Nikon P1000. Its far less expensive and will provide more reach than and tele lens for you camera. Take a memory card to a camera store and try one. You might just fall in love.
tainkc wrote:
Yes, the 400L should work just fine. I put on on my 7D (this has an APS-C crop sensor). Excellent lens.
Be careful, the guy from LA may not like how you spelled "it", "on".
unlucky2 wrote:
And might I suggest that after you find a great deal on the 400 5.6 you keep your eye out for a TC (1.4) for around $100.
You certainly may suggest it but from my personal experience I'd suggest not using a $100 teleconverter on a 400L prime on an EOS T3i.
Gene51
Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
Keith S wrote:
Hello HOG members.
My wife and I have become addicted to chasing the Orca whales around Puget Sound these days. The most beautiful thing I have seen in a long while. My problem is I only have a 55/250 canon lense on my EOS t2i. I most certainly need more power to get better shots from long distance. I am not going to change the camera just want a lense to reach out and touch those wonderful creatures.
I know there are many members that can help me upgrade my lense for this. Any and all suggestion are welcome.
Thank you in advance for all your assistance.
Hello HOG members. br br My wife and I have beco... (
show quote)
You are at a point where you can decide on a lens, then get a camera to best complement it. Your nearly 9 yr old EOS t2i is very likely unrepairable anymore. This is pretty much the situation with digital cameras. So, it begs the question, if you were to replace the body in the next year or so, what would you buy? You may want to consider this when you select a lens.
The long lenses are typically intended to work on both full frame and crop sensors. So getting a Canon 400 F5.6 or a 100-400 F5.6 II, is a great idea - one that will work for you today and into the future. Other non-Canon lenses that represent an excellent value for what they deliver are the Sigma Sport 150-600 and the Tamron G2 version.
If you end up replacing the EOS t2i with a 7D MkII or whatever the current flavor is at the time you do it - you ought to be able to still use any of these lenses. If you decide to get a full frame 6D Mk II, you can still use these lenses.
On the other hand, I am a Nikon guy, so I can't avoid mentioning the competition - the D500. It is one of the fastest handling crop sensor cameras I have ever used. It has a huge buffer, delivers 10 frames per second, like the 7D Mk II, but the buffer never really fills up. Autofocusing is fast and accurate, has dual card slots, highlight protected metering mode, etc. Truth be told, in a direct comparison of images taken with each, you can't tell which were taken with a Canon and which were shot with a Nikon. Both companies produce excellent products - and you can't go wrong either way.
You should pretty much ignore any advice that suggests a consumer grade wide angle to telephoto zoom might be a good option. It isn't. These lenses are usually at their weakest at the long end, and not particularly strong at other focal lengths, and will not work that well on full frame cameras.
joer wrote:
You may want to consider Nikon P1000. Its far less expensive and will provide more reach than and tele lens for you camera. Take a memory card to a camera store and try one. You might just fall in love.
A Coolpix P1000 costs around $1000 I believe. Sigma 150-600 Contemporary is around $950. The P1000 has fewer pixels on a smaller sensor than the EOS T3i. Doesn't sound like a better solution at all.
Stoshik wrote:
Hello~
I'm really sorry to bring this up...
I hate being pedantic, but you've gotten in to some bad writing habits over the years. And it's not a typo if you repeat it...
Please:When to Use Lense (Never)
What does lense mean? Nothing.
Lense is a misspelling of lens. It rarely appears in edited writing and should be avoided across the board.
Almost no one uses lense in published books.
Lense and lens are two spellings that refer to the same word, only one of which is considered correct.
Lens is the correct spelling.
Lense is a misspelling that probably arises from the plural spelling of lens:
Since lense is a spelling error, think of the extra E in lense as standing for the word error.
My apologies for being critical, not of you, but your spelling.
S
Hello~ br I'm really sorry to bring this up... br ... (
show quote)
You made a good point when you stated that you are really sorry. You could have added "rude" as well.
I would not hesitate to recommend the Tamron 150-600 G2 zoom. It's a great lens for the money, You might also look at the G1 version of this lens and you should be able to get a really good price on one of those.
Keith S wrote:
Hello HOG members.
My wife and I have become addicted to chasing the Orca whales around Puget Sound these days. The most beautiful thing I have seen in a long while. My problem is I only have a 55/250 canon lense on my EOS t2i. I most certainly need more power to get better shots from long distance. I am not going to change the camera just want a lense to reach out and touch those wonderful creatures.
I know there are many members that can help me upgrade my lense for this. Any and all suggestion are welcome.
Thank you in advance for all your assistance.
Hello HOG members. br br My wife and I have beco... (
show quote)
If you're strictly shooting whales, you might consider a 500mm 'Mirror' lense (spelled that way on purpose) w/adapter as an inexpensive telephoto option. Some good ones like Tamron or Tokina can be purchased at very reasonable prices on eBay (~$100)...just a thought
Keith S wrote:
Hello HOG members.
My wife and I have become addicted to chasing the Orca whales around Puget Sound these days. The most beautiful thing I have seen in a long while. My problem is I only have a 55/250 canon lense on my EOS t2i. I most certainly need more power to get better shots from long distance. I am not going to change the camera just want a lense to reach out and touch those wonderful creatures.
I know there are many members that can help me upgrade my lense for this. Any and all suggestion are welcome.
Thank you in advance for all your assistance.
Hello HOG members. br br My wife and I have beco... (
show quote)
If you are serious about reaching out and really touching distant creatures is the Tamron 150-600mm G2. It is a very good lens and won't break the bank.
Anything else is an also ran.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.