rlv567 wrote:
What am I doing wrong???
Over the years, I’ve owned and used a number of digital cameras from at least five major manufacturers, up to my current Canon G16 and Canon70D. I have used memory cards – from reputable brands – in all of them. I download my picture files directly from the camera to my computer and then erase them from the card (while in the camera). I never have formatted any memory card – in or out of the camera. I never have had a problem of any kind with this routine!
What am I doing wrong?
Loren – previously Palm Springs and Phoenix; now Baguio City
What am I doing wrong??? br br Over the years, I’... (
show quote)
You've been fortunate to not have any problems. I'm glad it's worked out good for you, though it's "risky".
I choose to use a number of smaller memory cards (mostly 16GB now), which means having to change them during events I shoot. I get around 500 images per card and do this so that I don't have "all my eggs in one basket", in case a card fails or is lost, my whole day's work isn't lost with it. Sometimes I'll fill 4 or 8 or 12 or more cards in a day.
And I use my memory cards in five different cameras, so I always format every card immediately when I install it, to be absolutely certain there won't be any issues due to differences in the cameras.
And I use a card reader to download my cards, because doing so from the camera via the USB cable would take a long time, requiring the camera to be powered up the entire time and risking low battery shut down that can cause corrupted image files. Plus, since I'm using multiple memory cards, it would mean swapping cards back in and out of the camera during the download.... additional wear and tear on it that's unnecessary. But there's also some risk of wearing out or damaging the USB port of the camera, with frequent use of it for downloading. Most cameras' USB ports are part of the main board and, should it ever be damaged or worn out, would mean replacement of the entire board.... a rather expensive part plus more labor to remove since it requires near complete teardown of the camera to replace. The memory card socket, on the other hand, is a sub-assembly in most cameras that would be a lot less expensive to replace and is much more easily accessed, if ever needed.
Card reader makes more sense for me, too, having to download a number of cards. I don't erase them (or format them) with the computer, either. As a safety precaution, I only "copy" images off my memory cards, leaving the originals in place on the card until I'm sure that everything has been successfully saved to my computer and backup. (In fact, the originals remain on the card until the next time I use it, when I install it in the camera and format it).
That's what's worked well for me, shooting around 50,000 images a year and digital almost exclusively for fifteen years (and less frequently alongside film for another 5 or 6 years before that). In that time I've never damaged a camera, knock on wood, and out of around 100 misc. memory cards over the years, only had two card failures (once SD card wasn't usable right out of the package... the other a Compact Flash card thatworked once, then failed after images were downloaded). I've only used high quality, top brand cards (mostly Sandisk and Lexar). And I've only twice had a problem with corrupted image files. Once was my own fault, due to removing a card from a camera too quickly, while images were still being written to it (newer cameras are so fast, this is unlikely). Another time, also my fault, was corruption due to adding a USB hub to the path to the computer being used by the card reader... and easily solved simply by reconnecting the reader directly to the computer. (For some years now I've used built-in card readers, faster than the older USB 2.0 readers... though newer USB 3.0 is prob. faster.)
But, hey, if some other procedure is working for you... That's great! To each his own!