Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Analysis
Follow up to frustrated, frustrated, frustrated.
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Aug 5, 2012 14:58:13   #
marty wild Loc: England
 
I think your images look ok. There is no need to have such a large back screen when setting a shoot up for an infant. When I use my grandson who is two and half. I set up my speed-flash 600 as off camera flash at the back of the back screen and bounce the flash off a projector screen which is at the back of me. I am getting some very good results using the flash this way keep my grandson Jayden eyes wide open and no red eye
deanna_hg wrote:
For those of you who looked at my last thread here concerning studio lighting, this is the 'follow up'. I used my grandson who is 3 and tried it again. Used my 50mm the entire time which may have been the first nono. Was using my speedlite as my lighting, it being triggered by my camera's flash. My understanding is it is suppose to send out the signal but not flash. I think it is flashing. Used a white umbrella turning it to where the light bounces back to the subject and then for it to filter thru to the subject. I was at child level as evidence by some unlevel shots. Someone please tell me how to correct that in Elements. The shadows are frustrating me telling me this is a picture and not a 'portrait'. I have included my 'work space' which I mentioned in my last thread, and a photo of this endeavor. Many said the last photos were to 'busy'. So what now?
For those of you who looked at my last thread here... (show quote)





Reply
Aug 5, 2012 20:08:42   #
Newfie-1 Loc: Ontario-Canada
 
Lucian wrote:
seven inches from the background Newfie 1 ??? That is virtually against the wall and should never been done that close, regardless of lights on the background.

At seven inches away, I don't see how anyone could even get a background light in that space to light it up and reduce the shadow. Be at least a few feet away from your background.


Sorry I meant 7 feet

Reply
Aug 5, 2012 20:10:55   #
Newfie-1 Loc: Ontario-Canada
 
PalePictures wrote:
Lucian wrote:
seven inches from the background Newfie 1 ??? That is virtually against the wall and should never been done that close, regardless of lights on the background.

At seven inches away, I don't see how anyone could even get a background light in that space to light it up and reduce the shadow. Be at least a few feet away from your background.


Unless your background is the light. I use an octobox on occaisions as my background to give a solid white background.

I think I usually keep it about a foot though.

I also shoot 8-10 feet from the background sometimes. This give no background aka Black. (you gotta watch that spill light when you do that!)
quote=Lucian seven inches from the background New... (show quote)


Sorry I meant 7 feet

Reply
 
 
Aug 5, 2012 21:39:07   #
CaptainC Loc: Colorado, south of Denver
 
Lucian is right. Start with ONE light. It is possible to get wonderful images with one light. Then add a reflector to lighten the darker shadows you get with the one light. After you get good images with that, then add a second light.
Every light you add not only adds illumination, but an additional layer of complexity because they do not just add light, they interact with one another.

As to this is image - don't show the bottoms of feet - generally not a flattering look and the boy is too big for the tub. That can be a cute pose/prop for an infant, but he looks strange in it.

Your shooting space is not so bad, it is the brown couch and chair that are the problem. They sit where your lights need to go. So put them out on the front yard with a "Free for a good home" sign on them. You wanna take portraits or sit down? :-)

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Analysis
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.