Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Downsizing from DSLR
Page <<first <prev 6 of 7 next>
Jun 16, 2018 10:18:56   #
Hip Coyote
 
I use a m4/3 system and like it. For fun I have been looking at high quality lens attachments for a smart phone. There is a company, called Moment, which looks very promising and fun.

Reply
Jun 16, 2018 12:05:35   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
hj wrote:
That's the trouble with our world today. The other guy is always wrong and MY opinion matters.


Hasn’t it always been that way?

The ability to process a contrarian opinion and apply it constructively may be rare, but more often than not, helps us learn and grow.

Sometimes the customer really is wrong. I’ve been there, been wrong, and been damned glad to be steered toward the right solution.

This is a forum for sharing ideas, advice, perspectives, and opinion. It’s up to the readers to decide what is useful.

Reply
Jun 16, 2018 13:54:55   #
13oct1931 Loc: Lebanon, Indiana
 
One word: OLYMPUS---SH 2.; 5-axis Stabilization, 24X zoom, Light weight, pocketable, a plethora of options. Alyn

Reply
Check out Panorama section of our forum.
Jun 17, 2018 18:49:00   #
mohandas
 
Dear randik , I got your feelings.
Truly speaking , no compact camera will match the quality of a DSLR .

Please say the actual reasons for the comeback.

Is it due to the huge weight of DSLR ? Or price of additional lenses ?

There are so many options , don't buy cameras which have more zoom ratios , because we should sacrificed quality to zoom power ! So opt a compact with 15 X or maximum 20 X .anything beyond this is superfluous .

With warm regards , Mohandas Pazhambalakode , Palakkad , Kerala - 678 722 , INDIA .
E.mail : mohandaspzmpkd@rediffmail.com

Reply
Jun 17, 2018 23:52:06   #
Flyerace Loc: Mt Pleasant, WI
 
I just researched this exact challenge for a friend. She has terrible "shakes" and wants to have something that doesn't need to lens changes. I found the Panasonic FZ300 would fit the bill. With an F2.8 lens, everything should shoot fast and eliminate the "shakes" problems. I thought it looks good too, so I just ordered one from B&H. I'll give it a try and see if it fits the bill when I don't want to carry around my Nikon cameras.

Reply
Jun 18, 2018 11:41:12   #
markwilliam1
 
The Sony RX1 is Not a pocket camera unless you have big pockets Lol!

Reply
Jun 18, 2018 12:11:27   #
Rafacq
 
markwilliam1 wrote:
The Sony RX1 is Not a pocket camera unless you have big pockets Lol!


The RX100V as well as the 1-4 & 6 are!

Reply
Check out The Dynamics of Photographic Lighting section of our forum.
Jun 18, 2018 12:23:02   #
DaveyDitzer Loc: Western PA
 
markwilliam1 wrote:
The Sony RX1 is Not a pocket camera unless you have big pockets Lol!


Not sure what you are downsizing from, but the RX1 has a listed weight of 25-26oz. For comparison, the Nikon D5300 with a 35mm 1.8 lens weighs less. There are also light weight medium zooms weighing a little more. My D5300 with a 16-80 f2.8-4 zoom comes in about 32 oz. Just offering a point of comparison.

Reply
Jun 18, 2018 16:55:09   #
markwilliam1
 
None of the listed above listed cameras are pocket sized! Try to compare any Small Point & Shoot to the Sony RX100 series footprint. They truly fit in my shirt pocket! I think that’s what the original poster wanted a small point and shoot camera with amazing specifications that would fit in his pocket. Just my opinion and I am an actual user!

Reply
Jun 18, 2018 17:15:33   #
DaveyDitzer Loc: Western PA
 
markwilliam1 wrote:
None of the listed above listed cameras are pocket sized! Try to compare any Small Point & Shoot to the Sony RX100 series footprint. They truly fit in my shirt pocket! I think that’s what the original poster wanted a small point and shoot camera with amazing specifications that would fit in his pocket. Just my opinion and I am an actual user!


And that's why I suggested the Nikon P7800 which I currently use for a "pocket" camera. Last I looked, there was a factory refurb on E-bay for $300.

Reply
Jun 18, 2018 17:24:29   #
markwilliam1
 
That’s not even close to being a pocket camera Sir! No offense.

Reply
Check out Printers and Color Printing Forum section of our forum.
Jun 18, 2018 18:34:37   #
Mr. SONY Loc: LI, NY
 
DaveyDitzer wrote:
And that's why I suggested the Nikon P7800 which I currently use for a "pocket" camera. Last I looked, there was a factory refurb on E-bay for $300.


Who are you answering?

Reply
Jun 18, 2018 19:30:21   #
markwilliam1
 
You Sir.

Reply
Jun 18, 2018 20:21:04   #
Mr. SONY Loc: LI, NY
 
Mr. SONY wrote:
Who are you answering?


ME! Really?
I suggested a SONY RX100M5.
How much smaller a camera is there?
Of reasonable picture quality of course.

Reply
Jun 18, 2018 20:57:50   #
markwilliam1
 
No Bro’ wrong guy. I meant the Nikon poster. You and I are in agreement of a true pocket camera. I don’t know why others keep talking about much larger cameras they consider pocket size Lol!

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 7 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out AI Artistry and Creation section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.