Canon vs Nikon
Jun 3, 2018 00:43:21 #
ToBoldlyGo
Loc: London U.K.
Tracy B. wrote:
Best answer and very well stated.
How do you know it's not the equipment?
Jun 3, 2018 00:45:37 #
ToBoldlyGo
Loc: London U.K.
People are way off topic here. Please a moderator step in, this thread should be locked.
Jun 3, 2018 00:46:13 #
SharpShooter wrote:
Boy, that was way back before your beard was grey!!!! 
SS
SS
All I had then was peach fuzz !!
Jun 3, 2018 00:50:16 #
ToBoldlyGo wrote:
People are way off topic here. Please a moderator step in, this thread should be locked.
That's right, just when people are having fun, shut things down. Throw us in prison why don't you ??
Jun 3, 2018 00:51:55 #
ToBoldlyGo
Loc: London U.K.
graybeard wrote:
That's right, just when people are having fun, shut things down. Throw us in prison why don't you ??
It's insulting to the OP.
Jun 3, 2018 00:56:13 #
ToBoldlyGo wrote:
It's insulting to the OP.
Unless you are the OP, how would you know that? Jest wondrinn
......
Jun 3, 2018 01:32:01 #
Jun 3, 2018 01:55:46 #
ToBoldlyGo wrote:
How do you know it's not the equipment?
Because both these camera set ups are very capable of beautiful pictures. I would go as far to say that most cameras today are capable. However, having great gear isn't a guarantee. You have to have skill, understanding of the equipment, and many more factors.
Jun 3, 2018 02:00:01 #
SharpShooter wrote:
Boy, that was way back before your beard was grey!!!!
SS
SS
Possibly before you were born.
Jun 3, 2018 02:06:42 #
DavidPine
Loc: Fredericksburg, TX
I suspect your friend is a better photographer.
Jcor wrote:
I have been using Canon D5 IV for years with L lenses. I am finding that often my photos are not as sharp as they should be. My friend has the equivalent Nikon camera with equivalent lenses. His photos seem to be much sharper than mine. Does anyone have any similar experiences.
Jun 3, 2018 02:56:17 #
T-minus
Loc: Westminster CO
IBM wrote:
Bought a pair of Kirkland jeens at Costco ten yea... (show quote)
Yes, but if the Kirkland were always stiff and uncomfortable throughout their lifespan compared to the Levi’s which were snug and wonderful; are the Kirkland’s still better? Or maybe just a better value?
Jun 3, 2018 06:58:32 #
Jun 3, 2018 07:12:24 #
ToBoldlyGo
Loc: London U.K.
Tracy B. wrote:
Because both these camera set ups are very capable of beautiful pictures. I would go as far to say that most cameras today are capable. However, having great gear isn't a guarantee. You have to have skill, understanding of the equipment, and many more factors.
You're saying you know for absolute certainty that there is no fault with his camera.
Jun 3, 2018 07:16:20 #
ToBoldlyGo
Loc: London U.K.
graybeard wrote:
Unless you are the OP, how would you know that? Jest wondrinn
......
......
How pathetic. It's insulting because you're not helping with the issue. Still wondering?
Jun 3, 2018 07:32:00 #
In my camera club we are split about 50/50 on Nikon and Canon and 1 Sony . A friend who was a Nikon person lent me a camera when I was getting into digital and I liked so I went with Nikon , my friend I shoot with has Canon , NO DIFFERENCE IN THE QUALITY of the photos . The difference is Shutter speed , Aperture, and ISO and who uses it correctly , go to a camera rental and rent a Nikon for a few weeks then Canon , if that doesn’t work for you buy a point and shoot .
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.