Quite honestly, JD750, I think it's just the principle of the thing. Things I've wanted to use, I've always purchased. Up until recently, I've done contract work. It paid well and I was able to purchase several pricey software applications, Photoshop is one of them. I was alerted to updates and was able to install when I chose to do so. The latest version I've been using for several years is CS6 Extended. I'll probably continue to use that, as it does everything I need it to do.
A caveat: I realize that, by agreement, I'm not supposed to alter their code. Well, some of their methods don't quite work the way I would really prefer them to. Since I purchased the software, I can modify a little and have it do what I want it to do the way I want. Leasing may cause issues with that approach. It's akin to putting headers and a tuned exhaust on a car one owns, as opposed to doing the same to a leased one. Ask anyone who owns a home if they'd like to move into a leased one. I'd much prefer to purchase.
As for price, I've been using CS6 for about 5-1/2 years now. It still does everything I need it to do. The longer I use it, the lower the monthly rate becomes. It will never become 0, but it will get close enough to call it.
--Bob
JD750 wrote:
The Adobe Photographers Plan has reaped huge profits for Adobe (making a profit is what businesses are supposed to do) and gives better service to the customers in the form of real timrbtyñ. Customer costs are about the same as buying paid uldates.
What is not to like?
flyguy
Loc: Las Cruces, New Mexico
johnbhome2 wrote:
If Adobes business model works for you that's great, use it and shut up. If it doesn't work for you, don't use it and shut up. Can we now go on to something pertinent and useful instead of arguing about this bull crap. To each his own! Time to grow up and act like adults!
I find this to be the best response to this discussion and I second it.
hankswan wrote:
Simple question. Will my post processing software be available no matter where I travel? Will I have access to my photos (hiding in the clouds) when I am on a dream trip, and want to upload my daily take and keep track of my photo library? I do not own any of the software on my computer (all commercial products) but the programs are useable as long as I want them to be, and they are always available because I have them on my computer. Buying is better IMO.
Yes to the software since it is stored locally but accessing your data anywhere depends on your network connection. Personally I store locally to my laptop.
Regardless of the thread, WE DON'T NEED "WHAT THE F..."
LBENG wrote:
The main reason for NOT using ANY subscription software is the lack of any guarantee that the software will be usable tomorrow. Example: back in Windows XP days, I purchased a $2500 piece of CAD software. It ran fine and still does under XP. It does NOT Run correctly under Windows 7 (32 or 64 bit) or anything newer. I just use it once or twice per month on an old XP machine. They want $1500 for a upgrade. Subscription based software forces you to use newer versions of windows or loose software already payed for.
No Thanks
The main reason for NOT using ANY subscription sof... (
show quote)
That’s the whole point with subscriptions in that that they carry you through upgrades whereas a point in time purchase won’t unless you buy the upgrade.
Being a retired truck driver and former Marine, I FEAR NOTHING! The way I see it is if you are a pro, or a wannabe amateur photographer who feels he/she must have the latest/greatest Adobe software, and want's to fork out ten bucks a month for editing programs most people only use a small percentage of, I say go for it. It's your money to spend any way you want. As for me, being an advanced amateur I find PSE12 (which has a pretty good catalog system that works for me), Topaz Studio, (free) and Paint Shop Pro & Photomatix Pro all I need to edit my images, and I save $9.95 a month. Such is life, different strokes for different folks.
I've never had to purchase an upgrade to the photoshop software I use. Sure, I don't get upgrades any longer because Adobe doesn't support CS6 anymore. However, I don't need any upgrades now.
--Bob
mainshipper wrote:
That’s the whole point with subscriptions in that that they carry you through upgrades whereas a point in time purchase won’t unless you buy the upgrade.
I think it's worth it and I like always have the latest. It's worth two cups of coffee a month to me.
mainshipper wrote:
That’s the whole point with subscriptions in that that they carry you through upgrades whereas a point in time purchase won’t unless you buy the upgrade.
Yes, that is true. however My point is it will often require or actually implement upgrades in the operating system that causes problems with other software on the system.
rjaywallace wrote:
But your question is clearly aimed at Adobe photo/graphics editing subscriptions.
No not specifically Adobe, other companies, such as Phase one, Microsoft offer the scription model, and more will follow.
Mac wrote:
I think he was just trying to stir things up.
The thread has reached 4 pages and he has made no comment since the original post.
I was on travel away from my computer. Regardless will I read all the responses. Even if it’s a couple days later. Even then, sometimes I just “listen” to the different opinions, you can learn things that way.
Can any of the amatuers here point out the new features over the past six months that they have integrated into their workflow?
--
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.