normal for the Big Easy!!
Another image that, I think, would loose some impact in B&W.
Don
flyguy
Loc: Las Cruces, New Mexico
PAR4DCR wrote:
normal for the Big Easy!!
Another image that, I think, would loose some impact in B&W.
Don
Yes, this is an image that certainly would loose impact in black and white because of the color of the mans clothing in contrast to the onlookers clothes.
Why do people insist that street photography has to be rendered only in black and white, anyway?
flyguy wrote:
Yes, this is an image that certainly would loose impact in black and white because of the color of the mans clothing in contrast to the onlookers clothes.
Why do people insist that street photography has to be rendered only in black and white, anyway?
Glad that you are in agreement flyguy. Some believe that color detracts from street photography and B&W lets you focus on the impact of the image and does not distract you.
Don
Shellback
Loc: North of Cheyenne Bottoms Wetlands - Kansas
would it get so loose it would fall off the post? OH!~ wait, you meant lose... sorry
Nice street people image, Parfordcr.
Flyguy - nobody is insisting that all street photos must be b&w. The practice dates back to the era of film photography when most journalists, news photographers and street photographers carried cameras loaded with b&w film. Moreover, b&w images generally dispense with the distraction of color that may unwittingly change the character of an image. In certain circumstances, color is important to an image and we welcome seeing it.
Thanks jederick, at least three of us are in agreement. He was colorful and you best believe he was having fun!!
Don
No, it would make the outfit easier on the eyes.
flyguy wrote:
Yes, this is an image that certainly would loose impact in black and white because of the color of the mans clothing in contrast to the onlookers clothes.
That might be true in terms of a generic image, but the color in this case just detracts from any value as Street Photography. The subject for Street is not the man or his clothes, it is how he relates to his surroundings. By drawing all the attention to a part of the image that is totally unrelated to Street, the color just deadens the value of the image.
Color is an added, and very complicated, layer of composition. It requires extreme care to be effective. But when that can be done it is fantastic! See a thread titled "Lady in Red" posted by Voss.
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-482477-1.html
Now side by side for you to compare. You be the judge.
Don
PAR4DCR wrote:
Now side by side for you to compare. You be the judge.
Don
Not the ideal BW conversion. Reduce the brightness and increase contrast to give it some pop. Then adjust the gamma curve to get the best tone mapping.
Oddly enough, I prefer the b&w. Nice Shot!
flyguy wrote:
Yes, this is an image that certainly would loose impact in black and white because of the color of the mans clothing in contrast to the onlookers clothes.
Why do people insist that street photography has to be rendered only in black and white, anyway?
I agree I would like to see both color and B & W versions posted so the viewers could compare them.
PAR4DCR wrote:
Now side by side for you to compare. You be the judge.
Don
Hi, Don,
Hope you don't mind, but I'm adding one more for comparison. It has increased contrast and a blue filter to highlight the character. Not saying B&W is better, just throwing out a different view. Oh, and also put a vignette around it to help add contrast to the edges.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.