Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Printer
Page <<first <prev 7 of 9 next> last>>
Apr 2, 2017 16:48:25   #
SusanFromVermont Loc: Southwest corner of Vermont
 
retired2014 wrote:
Thanks Billy Bob. I'm still debating between that and the Pixma TS9020. The Pro 100 sounds extra large and since I live in a small apartment, I don't know about taking up so much space, but it is still a consideration.

The Pro 100 is definitely a better printer [a dedicated photo printer], and not as old a model as the TS9020 [an all-in-one printer]. Both will print on regular 8.5x11 paper, but the Pro 100 will also print on legal size paper as well as 13x9 paper. I just looked at printers on B&H's website, and the rebate is still available for the Pro 100. The final price is so good, you really should go for it. You pay $379.99 and get back $250.00 so final cost is $129.99. The TS9020 is smaller and a lightweight, and goes for $189.00. Do yourself a favor, find the space for it. If you cannot lift 43 pounds, get a friend to help. Oh, and standard shipping is free!

Reply
Apr 2, 2017 16:57:32   #
Stach Loc: Staten Island, NY
 
Sunlight fades everything, photos, couches, carpets, everything. Prints under glass hold up well as glass stops UV rays. I've had Epson printers and they were excellent. When comparing printers, for me, the cost of inks and the size they will produce is paramount for the following reason. When viewing a wall hung print done on different printers, if standing further than three feet away, most prints look good. There may be some differences in various colors, but differences in sharpness will usually not be noticeable. Again, I am discussing the same photo done on different printers. Usually wall hung prints are viewed from six feet away or more and not close up. I agree that when viewing a photo right after it comes out of the printer, you may notice any deficiencies if any, but hang it on a wall and stand six feet or more away and in my opinion, they disappear. Large photos are generally wall hung. 8" x 10" and smaller placed in albums generally in my experience, take a long time to fade. I have some old Kodak prints from my family which are about 50 years old and they have faded. My prints between 10 and 15 years old, in albums, are as good as when first printed. Some with printers original inks, some with a different manufacturers. I am sure you are and will continue to be thrilled with your printer. Just as I am with mine and another parties inks. To each.......

Reply
Apr 2, 2017 16:58:05   #
retired2014 Loc: Indiana
 
Peterff wrote:
She's my mother-in-law, but comes from a good set of genes, 5 other siblings still going strong, 3 older. My wife's Grandmother threw in the towel at 103 having achieved an ambition of being alive in three different centuries. I guess I married well!


Oooops! I read that wrong. Yep, I'd say you married well for sure.

Reply
 
 
Apr 2, 2017 17:09:11   #
Peterff Loc: O'er The Hills and Far Away, in Themyscira.
 
SusanFromVermont wrote:
The Pro 100 is definitely a better printer [a dedicated photo printer], and not as old a model as the TS9020 [an all-in-one printer]. Both will print on regular 8.5x11 paper, but the Pro 100 will also print on legal size paper as well as 13x9 paper. I just looked at printers on B&H's website, and the rebate is still available for the Pro 100. The final price is so good, you really should go for it. You pay $379.99 and get back $250.00 so final cost is $129.99. The TS9020 is smaller and a lightweight, and goes for $189.00. Do yourself a favor, find the space for it. If you cannot lift 43 pounds, get a friend to help. Oh, and standard shipping is free!
The Pro 100 is definitely a better printer a dedi... (show quote)


Only the OP can decide, but I do agree with you Susan.

Reply
Apr 2, 2017 18:13:34   #
cambriaman Loc: Central CA Coast
 
I have been very happy with a number of different Canon ink-jet printers. I also used their papers with excellent results.

Reply
Apr 2, 2017 18:54:43   #
retired2014 Loc: Indiana
 
SusanFromVermont wrote:
The Pro 100 is definitely a better printer [a dedicated photo printer], and not as old a model as the TS9020 [an all-in-one printer]. Both will print on regular 8.5x11 paper, but the Pro 100 will also print on legal size paper as well as 13x9 paper. I just looked at printers on B&H's website, and the rebate is still available for the Pro 100. The final price is so good, you really should go for it. You pay $379.99 and get back $250.00 so final cost is $129.99. The TS9020 is smaller and a lightweight, and goes for $189.00. Do yourself a favor, find the space for it. If you cannot lift 43 pounds, get a friend to help. Oh, and standard shipping is free!
The Pro 100 is definitely a better printer a dedi... (show quote)


Thank you for the suggestion. Do you know if B+H or Adorama is most reliable? They both have the same deal.

Reply
Apr 2, 2017 18:55:33   #
retired2014 Loc: Indiana
 
Stach wrote:
Sunlight fades everything, photos, couches, carpets, everything. Prints under glass hold up well as glass stops UV rays. I've had Epson printers and they were excellent. When comparing printers, for me, the cost of inks and the size they will produce is paramount for the following reason. When viewing a wall hung print done on different printers, if standing further than three feet away, most prints look good. There may be some differences in various colors, but differences in sharpness will usually not be noticeable. Again, I am discussing the same photo done on different printers. Usually wall hung prints are viewed from six feet away or more and not close up. I agree that when viewing a photo right after it comes out of the printer, you may notice any deficiencies if any, but hang it on a wall and stand six feet or more away and in my opinion, they disappear. Large photos are generally wall hung. 8" x 10" and smaller placed in albums generally in my experience, take a long time to fade. I have some old Kodak prints from my family which are about 50 years old and they have faded. My prints between 10 and 15 years old, in albums, are as good as when first printed. Some with printers original inks, some with a different manufacturers. I am sure you are and will continue to be thrilled with your printer. Just as I am with mine and another parties inks. To each.......
Sunlight fades everything, photos, couches, carpet... (show quote)


Thank you for the information Stach.

Reply
 
 
Apr 2, 2017 18:57:40   #
retired2014 Loc: Indiana
 
cambriaman wrote:
I have been very happy with a number of different Canon ink-jet printers. I also used their papers with excellent results.


Thank you. I do want to use some other brand papers that I have on hand. Do you know if these print well with the Canon?

Reply
Apr 2, 2017 19:03:16   #
retired2014 Loc: Indiana
 
TriX wrote:
I have a Canon 9000 MKII for photos and just bought an HP 4650 for general document printing/scanning/faxing. The Canon is excellent although it has 8 crartidges which are not cheap. If I were buying now, I'd buy the Canon Pro 100 at the great price of $129 after rebate - how can you beat that, and they often throw in a 50 sheet box of 13X19 paper as well. And although a complete cartridge replacement costs almost as much as the printer, they often throw in a huge assortment of Canon paper at no charge with the cartridge order. What I like best though is being able to turn it off for months, and turn it on and print with zero print head clogging.

Regarding the HP, I've owned HPs since the original Laserjet III, but I've recently become disillusioned due to their policy on proprietary cartridges along with high cost and limited number of copies. So why would I buy another? Because of their ink on demand promo. They monitor the number of prints you make and automatically ship replacement cartridges - no going to the Office Depot when you run out during a print job. Plus, it's $2.95/month for an average of 50 copies - I like that. The setup was ultra smooth. Had the direct connection and wifi from all devices, both PC and Mac working within 5 minutes - just seamless - everyone in my house can print from anything and the cost was about ~$100. Very satisfied (surprisingly). It's a model 4650.
I have a Canon 9000 MKII for photos and just bough... (show quote)


Thanks for this information. I'm leaning toward the pro 100. Now I need to decide whether I want to order from Adorama or B+H.

Reply
Apr 2, 2017 19:04:04   #
Bill_de Loc: US
 
B&H and Adorama are reliable. I normally use B&H out of habit because I used to go to the store.

Both have representatives who monitor this site and will step in if a problem arises.

--

Reply
Apr 2, 2017 19:08:11   #
retired2014 Loc: Indiana
 
Bill_de wrote:
B&H and Adorama are reliable. I normally use B&H out of habit because I used to go to the store.

Both have representatives who monitor this site and will step in if a problem arises.

--


Thank you. I bought my Nikon refurbished D7100 from Adorama and have been pleased with it, but I have never dealt with B+H. Just wondering if either has better customer service and reliability.

Reply
 
 
Apr 2, 2017 19:17:20   #
Peterff Loc: O'er The Hills and Far Away, in Themyscira.
 
retired2014 wrote:
Thank you. I bought my Nikon refurbished D7100 from Adorama and have been pleased with it, but I have never dealt with B+H. Just wondering if either has better customer service and reliability.


They are both very reliable organizations. Once again personal preference. They have both maintained high standards for many years. I have purchased from both of them and never had a problem.

Reply
Apr 2, 2017 19:30:12   #
retired2014 Loc: Indiana
 
Peterff wrote:
They are both very reliable organizations. Once again personal preference. They have both maintained high standards for many years. I have purchased from both of them and never had a problem.


Good to know. Thank you.

Reply
Apr 2, 2017 22:58:43   #
SusanFromVermont Loc: Southwest corner of Vermont
 
retired2014 wrote:
Thank you for the suggestion. Do you know if B+H or Adorama is most reliable? They both have the same deal.

They are both reliable, and I have dealt with both. Prefer B&H, though, because their website is very user-friendly, they have a very good and wide selection of merchandise, and a lot of free shipping. A lot of times they have very good bargains, and may include extras when buying a camera and some other things. [This is their way of giving an additional savings above what the camera companies allow.] And visiting their store is an amazing experience!

Whenever I am considering a purchase, their website is one place I go for researching specifications and other aspects. A lot of sections also have "compare" buttons which will bring the items up side-by-side.

Reply
Apr 2, 2017 23:04:19   #
retired2014 Loc: Indiana
 
SusanFromVermont wrote:
They are both reliable, and I have dealt with both. Prefer B&H, though, because their website is very user-friendly, they have a very good and wide selection of merchandise, and a lot of free shipping. A lot of times they have very good bargains, and may include extras when buying a camera and some other things. [This is their way of giving an additional savings above what the camera companies allow.] And visiting their store is an amazing experience!

Whenever I am considering a purchase, their website is one place I go for researching specifications and other aspects. A lot of sections also have "compare" buttons which will bring the items up side-by-side.
They are both reliable, and I have dealt with both... (show quote)


Sounds great. I've been measuring spaces to see if I can get this printer. So far I haven't found anywhere it will fit. I might have to settle for the TS9020. I have until the end of the month to come up with something, since the rebate ends then.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 7 of 9 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.