Good Morning-
This is to those using the Fuji X-T2 camera-
I'm wondering if the hype is as good as the reality- for those that have this camera, what do you think?

I have read the professional reviews and online consumer reviews and most all say it is.

Specifically I'm wondering about higher ISO noise- any better than what you were using?

Video- are you happy with the video?

Use of battery grip- is it necessary for non action shots? It appears to add a lot of bulk to the camera as well as more expense to an already expensive camera.

IS- I know that the stabilization is in the lens rather than the body (:() and many of the lenses are not stabilized. Has that been an issue?

It's really a toss up for me between the Sony a6500 and Fuji. I was happy with my Sony a6000 but not with the lens selection and the size was a bit small which made for some awkwardness.

Thanks for any comments you can add.

Oops- one more thing. I know that there was an issue earlier processing Raw images in LR (and probably Camera Raw as well) - can anyone address that?

You wrote: "It's really a toss up for me between the Sony a6500 and Fuji. I was happy with my Sony a6000 but not with the lens selection..." ~ Would not the lens selection issue with the a6500 be virtually identical to that of the a6000? Or, are you thinking that the 'in camera body stabilization' will allow more latitude with non-native lenses? Or?

FWIW; I stopped hoping for new native (Sony) APS-C lenses for my beloved a6000 and bought an X-E2S, for the more attractive lens selection, and for entertaining features like the "film simulations" and the RAW to JPEG conversions, in-camera. _Van

Good Morning-
This is to those using the Fuji X-T2 camera-
I'm wondering if the hype is as good as the reality- for those that have this camera, what do you think?

I have read the professional reviews and online consumer reviews and most all say it is.

Specifically I'm wondering about higher ISO noise- any better than what you were using?

Video- are you happy with the video?

Use of battery grip- is it necessary for non action shots? It appears to add a lot of bulk to the camera as well as more expense to an already expensive camera.

IS- I know that the stabilization is in the lens rather than the body (:() and many of the lenses are not stabilized. Has that been an issue?

It's really a toss up for me between the Sony a6500 and Fuji. I was happy with my Sony a6000 but not with the lens selection and the size was a bit small which made for some awkwardness.

Thanks for any comments you can add.

Oops- one more thing. I know that there was an issue earlier processing Raw images in LR (and probably Camera Raw as well) - can anyone address that?

You wrote: "It's really a toss up for me between the Sony a6500 and Fuji. I was happy with my Sony a6000 but not with the lens selection..." ~ Would not the lens selection issue with the a6500 be virtually identical to that of the a6000? Or, are you thinking that the 'in camera body stabilization' will allow more latitude with non-native lenses? Or?

FWIW; I stopped hoping for new native (Sony) APS-C lenses for my beloved a6000 and bought an X-E2S, for the more attractive lens selection, and for entertaining features like the "film simulations" and the RAW to JPEG conversions, in-camera. _Van

Hi Suntouched, from a Fuji X user (3+ years) in the UK.

Fear not, for hype is real in this case.

X-T1 owners, and many Canonikon DSLR users are flocking in droves to the T2. So many times I read and hear "it's the best camera I ever had, and so easy to use".

The new sensor does indeed give better control over noise at higher ISO's.

Video was never a strong point in earlier X-Series cameras. That situation has been addressed in the X-T2. It depends how high video is on your purchasing criteria. If video is major, then look at the new Panny micro 4/3 unit.
Thanks for your input. It's always a tradeoff... hmm

Yes your input helps- thanks. The video is important for impromptu opportunities although I have a Panasonic Gx8 for planned excursions. I am attracted to the Fuji for it's larger sensor and reported improved higher ISO quality. What keeps me from fully embracing the Fuji is the lack of stabilization in the body (for use of vintage and third party lenses) and the decrease in function without the battery grip. It's always a tradeoff...hmm.

Like many manufacturers Fuji wants to make add-on sales...... so they have a battery grip. It increases the overall size, gives you perhaps more stability if your own hands are prone to wobble, gives greater battery life and increases burst rate. Only you know if those benefits are needed ! For a lady with (potentially) small hands perhaps it's not needed to enjoy this camera.

They say that, for "normal hand stability", image stabilisation is more for the longer telephoto lenses. Some Fuji XF lenses are stabilised, some not ...... look at their website. The Fuji OIS definitely allows slower shutter speeds (if needed in low light).

Only you know what your lens requirements are. All XF lenses on X Series bodies will give you terrific image quality. The zooms are somewhat bulkier than the latest primes. Again your own personal preferences will take priority here, along with the depth of your wallet ..... erm, sorry, purse ! You could do a lot worse than look at the XF f2 primes, 23, 35 and 50 - may be all you need !

May I also mention that a female UHH member (CatMarley) has this camera and will, I'm certain, give you a "woman's-eye" run down on this camera.

If you've not already found him, put this website into your Fuji bookmarks. Look under the "Popular Posts" tab for his excellent X-T2 review and camera/lens guides .......

http://www.prophotonut.com/

Hope this helps. Yes, come and join the Fuji club ........

Good Morning-
This is to those using the Fuji X-T2 camera-
I'm wondering if the hype is as good as the reality- for those that have this camera, what do you think?

I have read the professional reviews and online consumer reviews and most all say it is.

Specifically I'm wondering about higher ISO noise- any better than what you were using?

Video- are you happy with the video?

Use of battery grip- is it necessary for non action shots? It appears to add a lot of bulk to the camera as well as more expense to an already expensive camera.

IS- I know that the stabilization is in the lens rather than the body (:() and many of the lenses are not stabilized. Has that been an issue?

It's really a toss up for me between the Sony a6500 and Fuji. I was happy with my Sony a6000 but not with the lens selection and the size was a bit small which made for some awkwardness.

Thanks for any comments you can add.

Oops- one more thing. I know that there was an issue earlier processing Raw images in LR (and probably Camera Raw as well) - can anyone address that?

I have the Sony 6300 and the XT2. I really like both. My issue with the Sony is the lens selection. I mostly use the Zeiss short tele zoom. There is not a good choice of top quality long lenses, but Sony's consumer lenses are surprisingly good.

The XT2 is great to use especially with the Non-OIS 16-55 though I understand the stabilized 18-55 is a great lens for the money. My problem with the Fuji is that the really good glass that's available is heavy. The 50-140 f2.8 is 2.2 lbs and the 100-400 is over three lbs.

I just went to The Galápagos Islands using my GX8 and a rented Panasonic Leica 100-400 and am over the top with the photos I was able to get.

Don't you have that camera?

I have an XT-1 and an XT-2. I also have 4 Nikons sitting in a drawer. After using the Fuji, I find the Nikons frustrating to use and produce a lower percentage of good shots. Consider this: smaller, lighter, all metal, super lenses, all controls external, no need to go through menus, ergonomic, great image quality, Super color rendition. There are other cameras which can exceed the XT-2 in one respect or another, but the Fuji is the best all-round compromise at doing everything you can want a camera to do.

I want to sell all my Nikon stuff. After using the Fuji, I can't find any reason to keep it.