One Camera or Two?
Apr 14, 2013 12:01:25 #
Bill MN wrote:
I've never seen a good picture yet taken with a bridge camera. Maybe I have better eyes than most.
What we have to do is get someone to post similar images, taken with a DSLR and a bridge and see how they look 0 without telling which is which.
Apr 14, 2013 12:02:56 #
Ken I have missed many a once in a life times shots.:) Heck, I even had a camera in my hands on a few. But I still enjoy the memory.:) How much you playing for a laky to carry your gear? Would love to come over and help you miss a few great shots.:):)
Erv
Erv
Kenneth Weston wrote:
I was persuaded by a friend that having a second c... (show quote)
Apr 14, 2013 12:51:19 #
I carry two cameras, both Olympus E-PM1's. One has a wide angle zoom, the other a tele zoom. These cameras are so light, even an old arthritic like me can handle both with no trouble.
Apr 14, 2013 12:56:42 #
Mithrandir wrote:
I carry two cameras, both Olympus E-PM1's. One has a wide angle zoom, the other a tele zoom. These cameras are so light, even an old arthritic like me can handle both with no trouble.
What lenses - focal lengths - do you have on them?
Apr 14, 2013 13:00:14 #
jerryc41 wrote:
Sometimes I like to bring two cameras when I go out shooting. I have one with a tele and the other with a wide angle. I use an OP/Tech double strap arrangement to carry one on each shoulder.
I'm wondering how many of you carry two cameras when you're out shooting or when you go on vacation. On the one hand, you don't have to stop and change lenses, but on the other, you have to carry two cameras.
I'm wondering how many of you carry two cameras when you're out shooting or when you go on vacation. On the one hand, you don't have to stop and change lenses, but on the other, you have to carry two cameras.
I would rather not carry 2 rigs on a long hike, but if I was gonna do it, I'd use a double Black Rapid. Like you, I am not real keen on changing lenses in the field for dust reasons. I guess it all boils down to whether or not I feel like I need 2 lens for what I am going to shoot. The Black Rapid has made toting a DSLR and a long lens a piece of cake compared to what it use to be. I call it "Photographers Lingerie." :-)
Apr 14, 2013 13:18:47 #
Stokes is right! 1it's a fantastic camera. I get pictures now I couldn't even get before. Here's a few examples.
Great blue heron 200 yards away
Osprey
Cormorants
Apr 14, 2013 13:26:05 #
This is an SX50 shot from about 150 yards away. It was tough even to see in binos.
It's the Great Blue Heron with a nestling
Apr 14, 2013 13:26:48 #
Jblanke wrote:
I call it "Photographers Lingerie." :-)
Now there's a topic for another thread - or maybe another section of UHH. :D
Apr 14, 2013 13:27:47 #
Dlevon wrote:
Stokes is right! 1it's a fantastic camera. I get pictures now I couldn't even get before. Here's a few examples.
Tripod? Zoomed all the way in?
Apr 14, 2013 13:44:53 #
Apr 14, 2013 13:45:17 #
It's a great question. I finally got tired of one camera, two lenses (Nikkor 16-85 and 70-300) and switching lenses all of the time so I sold those two lenses and now have the Nikkor 18-300mm. It is heavy but now I'm not missing any shots. I'm a happy camper. Other lens is Nikkor 60mm macro for macro photos once in awhile and when going to the zoo, I will lug along my Tokina 80-400 w/tripod (ugh.......heavy stuff).
Apr 14, 2013 14:07:40 #
jerryc41 wrote:
Now there's a topic for another thread - or maybe another section of UHH. :D
Look Jerry....your backpack is already full!! There is no room for your lingerie on that trip!! Seems like your bag go so full last time we talked that you ran out'a room and had to leave the spots behind!!
:) :)
Apr 14, 2013 14:28:41 #
jerryc41 wrote:
What we have to do is get someone to post similar images, taken with a DSLR and a bridge and see how they look 0 without telling which is which.
You are right but how do you get them to post untouched originals? My friend uses a SX50 and Panasonic Lumix FZ, don't remember the number. I compare them side by side with my SLR photos zoomed in on the computer screen. My photos have more colors and no noise. You just can't get enough light on the sensor with a bridge camera with that small of a lens. I tried a bridge camera but didn't keep it long. I would rather carry a good point and shoot in my pocket. I don't have the reach with my 300 or 500mm but I can enlarge and crop them and have a much better picture.
Apr 14, 2013 15:05:05 #
Well, I am a bit color blind also, to light pastels, but I have the advantage of having a wife who is not and is a world class quilter.I found that there is another option called black and white and it seems to be gaining in popularity amongst the photo nuts.
bad-penguin wrote:
The reason for the film is that I'm totally colour blind. Digital just does not come close to the quality of film for people like me, (digital equals approximately 70% of the quality of film, but those with normal colour vision will never notice the difference). So the film is absolutely necessity when I see an outstanding shot for my own collection.
Apr 14, 2013 15:07:56 #
jerryc41 wrote:
I like that lens, but I also like wide angle at times. Unfortunately, I don't like going to my bag and swapping lenses. Maybe I'll hire someone to follow me around carrying my equipment. :D
Yeah, like a camera caddy !
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.