jerryc41 wrote:
Sometimes I like to bring two cameras when I go out shooting. I have one with a tele and the other with a wide angle. I use an OP/Tech double strap arrangement to carry one on each shoulder.
I'm wondering how many of you carry two cameras when you're out shooting or when you go on vacation. On the one hand, you don't have to stop and change lenses, but on the other, you have to carry two cameras.
1. When I go out on a "shoot" I would carry two or more. 2. When I go just go "out" I normally carry just one.
On number 1, I would probably carry all of the lenses I own. For number 2, I carry a so-called, bridge camera.
I own a Canon 60D(60mmMacro, 50mm1.8;18-135mm;8mmFisheye;10-20mm,LensBaby;and a Canon SX30IS (24-720mm).
I am considering upgrading my "bridge" to a CanonSX50IS which has a greater zoom range and offers myriad other improvements over the SX30. Or, maybe the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 with a f2.8 aperture over the entire range - 25 - 600mm! I just waiting to see if Canons' next bridge can match the speed of the Lumix. But how often do we really need that speed?
I will never buy a 600mm lens for the 60D. Way too expensive for all, except the pro or specialist. Especially an f/2.8 for the long lenses.
More and more, bridge cameras will improve on lens quality, sensor size, and other options to render the DSLR obsolete for all but a few. So far, bridge camera I know about lack great macro capability.
I heard Bryan Peterson make a similar remark re bridge cameras, at a workshop of his which I recently attended.
The difference in quality of images between my bridge and the 60D is miniscule, if even noticeable, in normal viewing or enlarged prints.
For now, I'm keeping the 60 for macro and wide angle work, including the rarely used fisheye. It does have other impressive features found lacking in the SX30, of course.