Go it in one, how did you know? The Lumix was adjusted to match the Olympus at 35mm
johneccles wrote:
Go it in one, how did you know? The Lumix was adjusted to match the Olympus at 35mm
I have a super keen eye, and I can identify cameras by their pictures. Well, no, it was just a good guess. The center two seemed to be taken with the same camera, and I took a guess.
I'm still learning but I'm using my Panasonic DMC-G5X with 14-42 lens, additional lens: 45-200 and 100-300. On most picture taking, I using 14-42 and 45-200. At 61 years young, it's really something new, so I purchased from Legacy Learning System, "Learn and Master Photography by Vince Wallace."
While reading as well as posting on here over the few days this topic has been up. I found a couple things that I need to consider.
With some of these two camera or even one camera belts & straps you loose the ability to quickly snap on to a tripod.- which I defiantly need with my DSLR .
Now it is a matter of discipline to use the DSLR and it's lens , 18-55 & 100-300 and the Lumix FZ 18 both on every shot for a while.
My present camera harness & neck strap allows me to carry both comfortably and leave the tripod quick release on the DSLR.
NoSocks
Loc: quonochontaug, rhode island
bad-penguin wrote:
The reason for the film is that I'm totally colour blind. Digital just does not come close to the quality of film for people like me, (digital equals approximately 70% of the quality of film, but those with normal colour vision will never notice the difference). So the film is absolutely necessity when I see an outstanding shot for my own collection.
Where do you get the 70% figure?
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.