Scoutman wrote:
1. When I go out on a "shoot" I would carry two or more. 2. When I go just go "out" I normally carry just one.
On number 1, I would probably carry all of the lenses I own. For number 2, I carry a so-called, bridge camera.
I own a Canon 60D(60mmMacro, 50mm1.8;18-135mm;8mmFisheye;10-20mm,LensBaby;and a Canon SX30IS (24-720mm).
I am considering upgrading my "bridge" to a CanonSX50IS which has a greater zoom range and offers myriad other improvements over the SX30. Or, maybe the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 with a f2.8 aperture over the entire range - 25 - 600mm! I just waiting to see if Canons' next bridge can match the speed of the Lumix. But how often do we really need that speed?
I will never buy a 600mm lens for the 60D. Way too expensive for all, except the pro or specialist. Especially an f/2.8 for the long lenses.
More and more, bridge cameras will improve on lens quality, sensor size, and other options to render the DSLR obsolete for all but a few. So far, bridge camera I know about lack great macro capability.
I heard Bryan Peterson make a similar remark re bridge cameras, at a workshop of his which I recently attended.
The difference in quality of images between my bridge and the 60D is miniscule, if even noticeable, in normal viewing or enlarged prints.
For now, I'm keeping the 60 for macro and wide angle work, including the rarely used fisheye. It does have other impressive features found lacking in the SX30, of course.
1. When I go out on a "shoot" I would ca... (
show quote)
I would say the difference in iq will depend on the lens of the dslr, and asnyou say you cannot tell if younhave kne of the latest bridge. Of course mfgrs willsend their enviys to every forum to defend the dslr that brings in so much money. I havebthe sx30 is for my stationary birds and hopint to acquire the sx50 when i can sneak it in at home. I am abot to start using 2 cameras, 50d with 75_300 and TC and T2i with 18_200, or just either with 18_200 and TC. Gotta have the wide.