Tamron-200-500mm-5-0-6-3-Digital-Cameras/dp/B00021EE7W
Mar 7, 2013 07:54:17 #
Has anyone had experience with the above Tamron lens? I am considering purchasing one for my Canon 60D body.
Thanks
Tamron-200-500mm-5-0-6-3-Digital-Cameras/dp/B00021EE7W
Thanks
Tamron-200-500mm-5-0-6-3-Digital-Cameras/dp/B00021EE7W
Mar 7, 2013 07:56:20 #
It is a real BEAR to use hand held as it is a slow lens and has no form of optical stabilization. Be prepared to use it on a tripod only.
Mar 7, 2013 08:29:24 #
In most reports I have read, and with the tree club members we have who bought Tamron, they appear outdated, especially in the IS area, especially with no is still on some lenses, why...
Would you pay that to use this without IS, not me
Would you pay that to use this without IS, not me
Mar 7, 2013 08:46:41 #
mikeford45 wrote:
Has anyone had experience with the above Tamron lens? I am considering purchasing one for my Canon 60D body.
Thanks
Tamron-200-500mm-5-0-6-3-Digital-Cameras/dp/B00021EE7W
Thanks
Tamron-200-500mm-5-0-6-3-Digital-Cameras/dp/B00021EE7W
Hi, i recently got the 70-300mm with vibration compensation built in
i haven't had much chance to mess with it yet but can say the build quality is reasonable good, auto focus can be a bit hit or miss when not using point focusing, but i shoot in manual most of the time so not an issue
but overall its not bad for the money if on budget
like the others have said, i too would recommend a tripod or mono for additional support
Mar 7, 2013 09:22:30 #
For the money I would much rather get a decent pre owned Sigma 120-400 or 150-500 where the tamron can no where near compete
Mar 7, 2013 10:43:29 #
Mar 7, 2013 10:45:53 #
Thats kind of scary, need a lot of room to swing that long lens.
Thanks
Thanks
Mar 7, 2013 10:47:25 #
So far the comments are not going make me run right out and buy this lens.
Thanks
Thanks
Mar 7, 2013 10:51:02 #
mikeford45 wrote:
So far the comments are not going make me run right out and buy this lens.
Thanks
Thanks
You really need to look at the pre owned sigmas
the 120-400 is what I use on my site for sports, and I have a couple of D7000s I use the 150-500 on
Mar 7, 2013 11:27:58 #
Thanks, I will look at used Sigma.
This site is so helpful. I don't think I will make another purchase without consulting the forum.
This site is so helpful. I don't think I will make another purchase without consulting the forum.
Mar 7, 2013 11:52:35 #
mikeford45 wrote:
Thanks, I will look at used Sigma.
This site is so helpful. I don't think I will make another purchase without consulting the forum.
This site is so helpful. I don't think I will make another purchase without consulting the forum.
WRONG.
Yes word of mouth from users is the best BUT we ALL make mistakes.
Read, listen then decide what is best for you.
Look here at the post I did for the reviews
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-95363-2.html
I posted a magazine review, ZOOM in/out holding down Ctrl and use the mouse wheel
No disrespect but google reviews such as Kenrockwel and DPreview and search
Mar 8, 2013 06:12:19 #
lovitlots
Loc: Tottenham, Ontario, Canada
I have the Tamron 200 - 500mm lens for my Sony. It works well. A lens that size, you'll be using on a tripod most of the time anyway, with or without stabilization. They're just to heavy and big and when you shooting at 500 mm it is difficult to keep things stable. I have image stabilization with this lens and it does work but I still shoot from a tripod. The focus is slower but still usable and the issues I've had so far is from subject movement and not focusing. You have to shoot at high speeds to compensate and that isn't always doable under certain light conditions without adding a lot of noise. I've had to learn to use the lens successfully and it's not because the lens is poor but because it is big. I think you'll find the same thing not matter which one you buy.
Mar 8, 2013 09:37:32 #
IT is very slow and heavy. Not very useful without a tripod or monopod (If so, Need to hold this very steady) except in very bright sunlight. A bit sloppy when wide open. I suggest you rent before purchase
Mar 8, 2013 16:23:51 #
oldphotog
Loc: The wild west
I have a Tamron 200-500. All The comments about no IS, needing a tripod, slow aperture etc. are true and should be expected for a lens like that. But, for the price, it is a great lens. If you want a faster lens, IS, etc, buy an $8000+ Canon or Nikon. I live very close to Yellowstone National Park and spend much time happily shooting wildlife there. It's North America's Serengeti. Frequently, I've jumped out of my vehicle with the Tamron and no tripod to grab a good shot. Bracing the lens against a tree or rock with a high shutter and maybe a boost of my ISO usually gets really good results. I usually use a heavy tripod whenever possible. When shooting wildlife, you want a shallow DOF so f/5 isn't really an issue. IS doesn't usually work on a tripod. If you have a chance to rent one, do it, other wise buy it. You can always return it at a reputable store. It takes a little getting use to but for the money, it is a great lens.
Mar 8, 2013 16:40:18 #
lovitlots
Loc: Tottenham, Ontario, Canada
oldphotog wrote:
I have a Tamron 200-500. All The comments about no... (show quote)
I agree with whole heartedly on this Oldphotog. I think if you buy one the more expensive lenses you will still have to get used to using it. When you get the feel for using it, it will bring you pleasure with the results. A place you can go to see what you can do with the lens is on flicker. There's one other site that posts a lot of pictures taken with this lens as well, but the name escapes me at the moment.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.