phcaan wrote:
It seems you have missed a lot. The prudent thing to do is to wait for the results of the investigation and see just what the facts were, and then make your determination of who was wrong, or if they both were.
I suspect however that waiting for the facts is not something you are interested in doing, you are too busy pushing forward your agenda, you and twardlow.
You're right. It seems the more prudent thing to do is simply to step away, with some regret that I joined this discussion at all. It has obviously degenerated from an objective exchange on the reported evidence to something else. My opinion one way or the other is of no consequence. But it is telling that, upon any question raised about the assumptions that underlie opinions that you support, you resort to accusation rather than refutation. Best wishes,