Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: wesm
Page: <<prev 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 next>>
Jun 8, 2017 21:05:21   #
Architect1776 wrote:
Get a Canon EOS Rebel T6 EF-S 18-55mm IS II Kit. About $450.00 new.
Gets her into an incredible system that any EF or EFs lens ever made will fit. But beyond that that is unique to Canon these lenses also will work 100% perfectly with her new camera even if the lens is one of earliest ones ever made. It will be perfectly compatible and absolutely no loss of any function. She can't beat that with any other system and she can grow and do any type of photography from high power sports with an EOS 1DX MII to the highest resolution FF DSLR made in the 5DSR. The T6 is incredible in it's own right and is a part of a full system she can infinitely grow into including mirrorless.
Get a Canon EOS Rebel T6 EF-S 18-55mm IS II Kit. A... (show quote)


I'm a Canon shooter, I don't believe EF-S lenses will work with a full-frame body, just vice versa. However, we have a long ways to go before we start worrying about that.
Go to
Jun 7, 2017 02:05:44   #
First of all, I did use the search function, and the most recent thread matching these keywords was from 2015. Seems like things have changed enough in two years to merit another summary.

A friend wants to get a good entry-level camera. I asked here what she wanted to photograph, she basically said landscape, nature, people. So first I suggested that her phone would be good enough. I think she wants to get more into composition, where depth of field becomes more important. Budget is around $500.
Go to
Jun 1, 2017 16:57:51   #
amfoto1 wrote:
I'd guess that 98 out of 100 "camera problems" are no fault at all of the camera or lens... but are due to the user doing something wrong.

If you could post them, it would be very helpful to see one or more of the "faulty" images with EXIF still attached.

You mention 20 second exposures and that should always cause Long Exposure Noise Reduction to operate when it's set to "Auto" (or "Enabled"). Set to that, LENR should activate with any exposure of 1 second or longer.

Are you aware how LENR works? It's actually two "exposures" of the same length, one right after the other. The first is the "usual" exposure where the shutter opens and an image is recorded. The second that immediately follows is a "blank" that the camera does with the shutter closed, which it then uses to detect noise, which is then "subtracted" from the first image. So a 20 second exposure will take at least 40 seconds, for example. any exposure with LENR applied will take twice as long as it's setting on the camera.

That explains why your "exposures" were taking so much longer than the other people... they probably didn't have LENR enabled.(I would probably turn it off for star field shots, too.... but you should ask them.)

Here's the tricky part... If you forget what's happening and cancel the second "shutter closed" exposure for any reason (such as by turning off the camera), the camera will dispose of BOTH the LENR and the original image!

If you try to "light paint" during the LENR "blank" shot with the shutter closed, your efforts won't be recorded.

Generally speaking, the 6D is a very low noise/high ISO capable camera. One of the best. Should have been able to shoot without LENR, at at 6400.You might give it a try.

The main reason many night shooters use f/2.8 lenses is not necessarily that they use the lens wide open... In fact they may stop the lens down to an optimal f-stop for best edge-to-edge sharpness with the particular lens they're using. (You should test your lens to see what it's optimal f-stop is.)

Many users might choose an f/2.8 (or faster) lens for a brighter viewfinder. But with DSLRs, Live View and Exposure Simulation might be a good substitute.
I'd guess that 98 out of 100 "camera problems... (show quote)


I like this proposed explanation. Especially about not recording the light painting. I always have LENR turned off, based on others' advice.
I have gotten excellent results with a 16-35 f2.8, good results with a 24mm, and mixed results with a Sigma 20mm f1.4, all wide open, but I really think my problems with the Sigma were focus-related.

Thanks
Go to
Jun 1, 2017 14:40:23   #
OneEasyRider wrote:
Nice captures! With my luck I would have dropped the lens. LOL


Damn near did, myself! Thanks
Go to
May 31, 2017 23:59:24   #
I spent Memorial Day weekend in the Mojave National Preserve. Fantastic place! All those people broiling in the sun, stuck on I-15 coming back from Vegas don't know what they're missing. On second thought, just move along, nothing to see here.

I made a new friend. He wandered across the road from the dry lake bed. I was dumbstruck, I'd always wanted to see a bighorn ram, and here he was, posing for me. I managed to get the 150-600 Tamron onto the camera body, and even got a couple of shots in focus, remarkable since my hands were shaking from excitement.

I spent several delightful to harrowing hours bouncing along the Mojave Road, and a jeep trail that follows the LNG pipeline. I finished up with a sunset behind Kelso Dunes. Just by pure luck I caught the sun lighting up the seed pods on a taller creosote bush, I rather like the effect.

A very delightful way to celebrate the day and my impending retirement!




Go to
May 25, 2017 01:31:24   #
markngolf wrote:
The best prices, online, for Canon only, is www.Profee.com. If one speaks with either David or Ester they will beat most prices.
Mark


Umm, some mistake in the URL? This site doesn't appear to have anything to do with cameras.
Go to
May 25, 2017 00:58:17   #
blackest wrote:
rsync, you need the right recipe but it backs up anything, to anywhere, anyhow, pretty much.


Wow, old-school skillz!!
Does rsync even exist on Windows? I use it all the time on Mac and Linux, but then, I'm a Professional
Go to
May 12, 2017 20:08:00   #
BHC wrote:
I don't think you have any idea of how shocked some of us were to read your question; it was basic, plain and simple - and remarkably wise and thought-provoking. As I began to write an answer, having used the term stops for 60+ years, I suddenly realized that it wasn't one of the sequence of numbers we use to explain an exposure variable. As I stop (pun not intended) and think about it, I realize that a stop is not just the size of the aperture; a stop is one of those ubiquitous terms we throw around about apertures, shutter speed, ISO, filter density, etc., without giving any thought to the complexities we are discussing. It has a myriad of definitions, meanings and purposes. When you read your book, you will know what the word generally means, but you will also learn the context of its use - and that will lead you to a better understanding of photography. I won't try to answer your questions; the answer is more meaningful than many of us understand. Thank you for your question and for having the courage to ask it. Don't let smarmy remarks and jokes lead you to think it was not a wise question.

And, by the way, the next time a sales representative asks you a question you don't understand, ask him/her to explain the question. You don't have to believe them; just listen to their sputtering inane explanation - because by that time you will know the answer and smile at their ineptitude.
I don't think you have any idea of how shocked som... (show quote)


I think it's a great question. I really don't know the answer. Can anyone define what one stop of light is? Or is the term "stop" always used in a relative sense, to mean a doubling or halving of the amount of light of some other configuration? It seems like Exposure Value is another way of saying the same thing.
Go to
May 12, 2017 19:32:55   #
repleo wrote:
I understand 'stops' for ND filters. Where it gets confusing is when, for instance, they describe a 10 stop ND as a 1000X or as a 3.0.


10 stops means that it cuts the amount in half 10 times in a row. Thats the inverse of 2 raised to the 10th power, which is precisely 1024, or approximately 1000.
I've forgotten the correlation to the third scale, the 3.0.
Go to
May 12, 2017 01:36:03   #
tgreenhaw wrote:
My wife and I are vacationing later this month in Rome for two days, a week in a villa in Chianti and finally two days in Florence. We'll be doing a day trip to Sienna and Montalcino and maybe another day in Lucca with our rental car. Barring catastrophe, I'll post pictures here next month when I get back.

I'd like to tap into the UHH brain-trust and all suggestions are welcomed especially concerning where the best spots photographs & short videos are allowed and what problems to look out for.

I'm second guessing my original plan to pack my full equipment backpack (Canon 5ds, 70d, Ricoh Theta-S, 10-18mm, 18-135mm, 35mm 1.4L, 24-70mmL, 100-400mm L, 320EX Speedlite, Manfrotto Travel Tripod, batteries, chargers, filters, etc.)

I've been forewarned about thieves in Rome; is Florence risky as well? (bear in mind, I live in Chicago :-)
My wife and I are vacationing later this month in ... (show quote)


I take at most two lenses, a 24-105 (the zoom is nice for street photography) and a 16-35.
Don't miss the Duomo in Florence, it's quite a street scene. There was a jazz trio playing there that was as professional as I have heard (violin, guitar, bass). Architecture is spectacular, Tuscan scenery is spectacular. Lucca is really neat, an old walled city with the walls still intact. While there, try the Montechiari, a wonderful local red wine.

Thieves are everywhere. Don't give them any targets. I walk around with one credit card, enough cash for the day, and a copy of my passport in a small wallet that fits easily in an interior, zippered, front pants pocket. Everything else is locked in a safe in the hotel. I learned this he hard way, having my pocket picked in Barcelona. In some cities, they work as teams, a young girl or children to distract you while somebody else rifles through your backpack or purse. Just carry snacks or water in your backpack.

Florentines seem to specialize in the motorbike-riding, grab-n-go artist.
I've also seen videos where, again operating as a team, one person will literally lift the lens off your camera while others distract you.

I love Italy. Get out of the cities, go to some small towns. We stayed in a little town called Barga, an hour north of Lucca. One evening, we were sitting at a trattoria, the owner was chatty, he wanted to know if we liked music. Next thing we know, we're sitting in box seats for a production of La Boheme in the local theater (seating of about 100). Turns out the owner's wife was the opera producer. I've never met friendlier people!

If you want to see a couple of my souvenir shots, PM me and I'll send them to you.
Have fun!
Wes
Go to
May 12, 2017 01:19:04   #
camerapapi wrote:
I can tell you right now that regardless of your experience with Canon the way you are trying to conduct business is not the right one. We like to see someone well identified and familiar to the forum. I guess you have not done your homework because it is evident that selling camera gear it is a must to show pictures to others of the items that are for sale. That helps a lot and makes others take decisions.
Begin by identifying yourself and showing where you are located. Show pictures of the camera and your accepted method of payment along with the price you are asking.
Those guidelines in general work very well for the seller.
I can tell you right now that regardless of your e... (show quote)


There was another guy on here selling the same thing. I sent him a PM, and he responded with pictures, serial clearly visible, etc. Only problem was, he was in Turkey, so the camera didn't have a US warranty, not to mention the challenges of verifying an identity overseas, payment (NEVER use Western Union), etc. After he sent me two follow-up emails pressuring me to buy, I was completely convinced it was a scam.
Go to
May 6, 2017 15:48:43   #
Gene51 wrote:


Here is an example of the work of a friend who uses a full frame Canon (5D Mk III) and a very sharp Canon 400 F5.6, hand held with no OS.

https://untamednewyork.smugmug.com/Birds

As you can see, it's not about long lenses and teleconverters - it's all about proper technique, studying the subject(s) and patience. I've been with her and watched her wait hours for the right shot(s) and her work clearly shows what she can do.


Wow.
I really liked those.
I have hummingbirds all over my front yard, they're particularly fond of a kind of sage we planted, long stems of purple flowers.
Go to
May 4, 2017 02:36:27   #
Erik_H wrote:
A quick show of hands please. How many photographers here are also musicians? I find it interesting that so many people who are "artistic" often are so in more than one discipline. Ansel Adams was also a classically trained pianist, you have Ralph Gibson, and more recently people like Brian Adams, Nikki Sixx (no joke!), and Graham Nash. All are well known musicians and are also Photogs. My father was a photographer and jazz drummer who must have rubbed off on me because I'm also a musician in addition to being a photographer. My eldest son, who plays multiple instruments, also has a keen eye for photography.
I'm sure that there have been many studies on this, but I'm just wondering how many in our little community practice both arts.
A quick show of hands please. How many photographe... (show quote)


Old-time fiddle, banjo, acoustic guitar, mandolin. Also got a Stratocaster that I sometimes take to parties))
Go to
Apr 14, 2017 16:41:40   #
Golden Rule wrote:
Thanks to you all. Making a list of all the suggestions and will start researching. If I want to photograph only some of the wineries such as Castello di Amarosa, will I be charged for walking the grounds? Are there any lakes in the region for letting my 2 Golden Retrievers swim?


Lake Sonoma, worth the drive over.
Go to
Apr 8, 2017 17:28:27   #
John Howard wrote:
I am up in the Blue Ridge mountains and the flowers are starting to bloom. Thinking about a series - dogwood, azalea,redbut and rhododendron. All I have with me are four small prime lenses - 18, 25, 50 and 85.

Do I need a macro lens? Weather is stormy and light is flat (similar weather to Augusta). Think maybe the dogwood would make a good high tone image.

And it is windy so will need to shoot rather fast. DoF will be difficult with the 85mm.

Am I trying to do the impossible?
I am up in the Blue Ridge mountains and the flower... (show quote)


Full frame, or crop sensor?
I would use either the 25 or the 18, depending on your answer, to photograph clusters. I photograph desert wildflowers, some quite showy, others incredibly tiny. I normally use a 24-70 zoom on a full-frame body, covers both clusters and individual flowers. I like the photos I get as much or better as those i have taken with a 100mm macro lens.

For windy conditions, I try to :
(a) get out of the wind or
(b) use the fastest shutter speed I can get away with, and try to time the shot against the gusts.

Normally, I'm hiking with minimal gear, nothing but a hat to block the wind, but I'm not coordinated enough to do that. So I try to move around, time the gusts as above, or move to a different area and subject.

I have a couple of wildflower albums here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/dancingtrout/albums
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.