Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: CraigFair
Page: <<prev 1 ... 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 ... 445 next>>
Nov 3, 2014 10:25:43   #
Albuqshutterbug wrote:
You may want to consider this ring.
Thank you Albuqshutterbug, That flash is so close the only problem is the Adapters are wrong.
Supports the lens of the following filter size : 52mm&#12289;58mm&#12289;67mm&#12289;72mm. Both the Nikon 60mm & 105mm have 62mm filter rings.
Now the what if. Could I use a 67mm-62mm step down adapter. Or would that just create a mess. Anyone???
Craig
PS: And thanks to Nikonian72, LoneRangeFinder & Screamin Scott for their informative input.
Go to
Nov 3, 2014 05:10:24   #
Albuqshutterbug wrote:
Thanks Craig. It's like she was using them to keep her big bum up.
You can also see the 'stretch marks' on her abdomen. from the eggs. Craig
Go to
Nov 2, 2014 20:13:37   #
Albuqshutterbug wrote:
Most likely one. ;)
That's cool in #1 you caught her spinnerets in full function. Nice work. Craig
Go to
Nov 2, 2014 19:41:58   #
LoneRangeFinder wrote:
Craig: I don't use the 60-mm macro, but I would suggest getting the flash as close to the lens as possible and then angling it as forward as possible so that shadows fall more behind the subject, even if the softbox "overshoots" your subject. In other words, it becomes more important that the box isn't aimed down on the subject from the top.
Nikonian72 wrote:
A 6x8-inch softbox on a standard speedlight at an acute angle, is still an option.
Thank you to both for a short term solution to my lighting issue but I can see if I'm going to play in this sandbox I am going to have to get the appropriate gear.
I think the macro ring flash will be first then I'll see about a Nikon AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED.
Macro Photography should me keep busy indoors for the Winter. Thanks again for your input.
Craig
Go to
Nov 2, 2014 18:19:18   #
Nikonian72 wrote:
Not too shabby. The Nikkor 60-mm is an excellent lens, but the MWD is only 90-mm = 3.5-inches. Not much room to provide illumination.
Yes I see what you mean, a lot shadows with this subject. And the light is very angled onto the objective. Any ideas short of buying a new ring flash?
Craig
Go to
Nov 2, 2014 15:44:32   #
This is my second try at Macro with my Nikon 60mm Micro. This little critter was elusive. I was running f/stops and ISOs when he hopped onto the set then I had to coax him onto the flower, then try to get a fix on him before each movement. This is the best I could get moving everything around manually.
#1 Uncropped 1:1 adjusted clarity and exposure.
#2 Cropped approximately 50%
NIKON D600 at ISO 80, with Nikkor 60-mm macro lens, Nikon SB-700 speedlight w/ diffuser, 1/250-sec at f/16

1:1

(Download)

Cropped

(Download)
Go to
Nov 2, 2014 13:52:30   #
Gene51 wrote:
And in the process, those "embarrassers" and "humiliators" have raised there "bully" flags. Igor - don't let the noise get to you, there are those that will help you, and there will be others that have no interest whatsoever in helping. You'll figure out who they are soon enough. :) If you become uncomfortable with a question, you can always send a PM to anyone who you trust will give you a solid answer to your question, regardless of how you've asked it.

I have to agree with Gene, my verbiage is often clumsy and not well thought out.
Gene not only has the expertise in the field of photography but in giving good advice in a forum like this one.
Craig
Go to
Nov 2, 2014 13:46:45   #
rpavich wrote:
?

What does that mean?

Light is light...

Under identical settings.
The Yongnuo pics said I am a Flash photo, Harsh
The Nikon pics said I am a Well Lit photo, Smooth
Go to
Nov 2, 2014 12:44:36   #
traveler90712 wrote:
Nikon D610, D7000
No studio. Location and fill flash
Not enough for a Nikon SB910
SB600 (want to use this as a slave)


For what you are looking to do please look at a Nikon SB700.
I did a set of test shots with both the YN-560III and the SB700. And the SB700 gave me much more natural photographs. You're not a Pro so the SB910 is not the flash for you.
Craig
Go to
Nov 2, 2014 12:22:52   #
Albuqshutterbug wrote:
Canon 7D
Canon 100mm Macro Lens
ISO 400
f/11
1/125th second
Cropped but otherwise untouched from camera
Pretty pleased with the sharpness of this lens.
Just an experiment since its only 100mm.


It is nice and sharp. What a diffrence a Prime makes.
Craig
Go to
Nov 2, 2014 11:39:45   #
Frizzen wrote:
Three more handheld with my Canon SX 50


1200mm on a Point & Shoot handheld, good job Frizzen.
Craig
Go to
Nov 2, 2014 11:32:19   #
Frizzen wrote:
These were all taken with just my Canon SX 50 handheld.


Great job for a point & shoot handheld.
Craig
Go to
Nov 1, 2014 14:26:42   #
astroturf wrote:
I have a celestron.


Sorry Astroturf, I thought you had at least one Meade :lol:
Craig
Go to
Nov 1, 2014 14:20:31   #
fstop22 wrote:
The perfect focal plane really gives your macros depth. The more tangent the subject is to your lens, the better the illusion of Depth of Field. Regardless of all this, you still have to nail the focus on the eye to make the photo. In combination with focal plane, this is the key. Easier said then done, but as with all Macro: practice, practice, practice. As for aperture f/14 to f/22 works well. Now which one of these apertures works Best with Low ISO, at most ISO 200, as any higher your photos degrades much more than diffraction from using apertures above f/16. I use f/16 simply because my flash is mounted on top of my camera and any aperture smaller than f/16 and lower than ISO 200, my flash requires near full strength. At f/16, ISO 200, & 1/200-sec, my flash works well at about half power and recharges as fast as I need. In all it's a combination of these three elements that will work best For you.
The perfect focal plane really gives your macros d... (show quote)
This is the best description I've read yet on 'settings for Macro Photography'. Thank you fstop22.
By the way a typically great shot by Albuqshutterbug. He has a real feel for the Art.
Craig
Go to
Nov 1, 2014 14:09:42   #
MtnMan wrote:
You might be able to get an adapter for your connector that makes it f6.3. I was able to get one for my ancient C8. It enabled me to get the full moon into the image.

I think it was about $70.

(Ah, I now see others recommended the same. It should work with your Meade.)

Thanks MtnMan
It should fit, Astroturf has one on his Meade and the ad says Celestron and Meade SCT's.
I do need to get the bigger Deep Sky objects in view at a faster f/stop & lower ISO.
Craig
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 ... 445 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.