Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Jim Bob
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 721 next>>
Mar 8, 2018 11:14:46   #
NikonD750Mike wrote:
I’ll be going on a Viking River Cruise in September. We’ll be visiting Geneva, Zurich, Zermatt, Basel, Strasbourg, Speyer, Mainz, Koblenz, Cochem, Bernkastel, Treir, and Paris. I plan on taking a Nikon D750, and the following lenses: Nikon 20mm F/1.8G, Tamron 24-70 F/2.8 G2, and a Tamron 70-200 F/2.8. I have a Nikon 200-500 F/5.6 but I won’t be taking it along.

Outside of the ‘normal’ things to shoot does anyone have any suggestions of ‘must see’ places and things to photograph?

I realize there are quite a few cities listed above. I’m hoping someone may have previously made the same trip or had visited some of the same places. I went on a Viking River Cruise in April 2017 to the Netherlands. It was absolutely wonderful.

Thanks.
I’ll be going on a Viking River Cruise in Septembe... (show quote)

You will probably not use the 70-200 much.
Go to
Mar 8, 2018 09:34:34   #
RonM12 wrote:
I’ve used both the Nikon 14-24 and Tamron 15-30 on my D850. My experience with the Nikon 14-24 was it’s a little soft around the edges. It’s built like s tank and feels good in the hand. Focus and zoom rings are silky smooth. The Tamron 15-30 build quality is also very good. But admittedly to me the Nikon “feels” better. The Tamron gives up 1mm on the low end, but picks up 6mm on the upper end which is handy. It also has vibration reduction. To my eye the Tamron is a little sharper on the edges over the Nikon. I prefer to purchase Nikon lenses when it makes sense and in this case it didn’t. I sold my Nikon and kept the Tamron. It’s nice that it was about $700 less than the Nikon, but for me over the life of the lens, price wasn’t a big factor. Although, with the $ I saved I purchased some other gear.
I’ve used both the Nikon 14-24 and Tamron 15-30 on... (show quote)


Smart man.
Go to
Mar 8, 2018 09:29:58   #
1frostygun wrote:
The choices are a 70-300 in mint condition from Roberts (370$) or a refurb from Nikon (400$).


Does Roberts provide a warranty?
Go to
Mar 8, 2018 09:13:51   #
MT Shooter wrote:
I have been shooting wildlife professionally since the early 1970's and Auto ISO would be one of the LAST settings I would choose. I always select my ISO & WB based on the scene and light I am shooting in.


On this issue you are dead right.
Go to
Mar 8, 2018 09:12:54   #
willy6419 wrote:
I'm an amateur hobbyist that shoots some macro, mostly landscapes and wildlife, working on BIF skills in preparation for 5+ weeks in Alaska. Nikon D 500 and D 750 bodies with a variety of lenses. Normally RAW and Lightroom post processing. Tripod or monopod when i can.

I'm experimenting with Auto ISO for wildlife to maintain desired shutter speed image quality, in varying light conditions. My goal is tact sharp image.

Any advice to speed my learning curve or redirect my thinking is appreciated.
I'm an amateur hobbyist that shoots some macro, mo... (show quote)


Simple. Use the lowest ISO possible to capture the image you are shooting. I only use auto ISO in situations where lighting is unpredictable. Your mileage may vary.
Go to
Mar 8, 2018 09:08:26   #
DON B wrote:
I thought I would post a few images taken early February in Florida.

Don B


Sure wish you had saved the original as I feel confident this presentation does not do these remarkable images justice.
Go to
Mar 8, 2018 08:25:17   #
MT Shooter wrote:
Well there is another idiot post. They are getting to be expected though.


You ain't never lied.
Go to
Mar 8, 2018 08:24:17   #
ballsafire wrote:
I know there are some knowledgeable people in this forum who will give me some good advice. I am now in possession of a Canon lens (28-105mm f/3.5-4.5 II USM) with a tightly stuck focus ring (wheel) and the distance window doesn't work; however I'm able to take good photos anyway. So, I am thinking, will the defective lens cause the camera to have problems?? Thanks in advance for all your answers.


Maybe. Depends on the nature of the defect.
Go to
Mar 8, 2018 07:22:23   #
4 pages on such a mundane topic. Amazing. Disturbing.
Go to
Mar 8, 2018 07:15:40   #
cjc2 wrote:
A cheap lens it isn't, but it is an extraordinary one. It is truly my most used lens and I use it for pretty much everything I shoot, or at least it is along in my bag. It is lightning fast in focusing, at least when coupled with a D5, D500 or D850 (all have the latest, dedicated processor AF system). Believe it, or not, they have shaved some weight off with the FL. It doesn't have the focus breathing issue of its predecessor and, finally, they have not only replaced the focus lock buttons of the VR I, but have made them dual functioning. The newest version is sharp as a tack. I'd place it my top 5 Nikor lenses. It's not cheap, but I'd have gladly paid more to get what I needed -- this particular lens is that important to my work. Sorry to sound like a Nikon salesman, but this is one superior lens that is useful for quite a lot of work. (I would not say any of that about the previous version.) I know, I rant!
A cheap lens it isn't, but it is an extraordinary ... (show quote)


I understand. It is indeed and amazing lens. I have nothing but praise for the image and build quality. But priced for the consumer enthusiast it is not. Took me six months to pay for that baby. But I wouldn't trade it for anything. It's that good and I'm not known for being effusive about many products.
Go to
Mar 8, 2018 07:12:14   #
SteveR wrote:
I don't believe that VR on this lens was meant to help with camera shake. I think it's main purpose was for low-light conditions. If your concern is camera shake, it can be handled through shutter speed....except, perhaps, in low-light conditions.


WTF? And how would VR assist in low light situations? By reducing the effect of camera shake of course.
Go to
Mar 8, 2018 07:08:39   #
mleuck wrote:
Great, but why do I care what you add to your package? You should make this information available to your wife.


Go to
Mar 7, 2018 19:37:50   #
cjc2 wrote:
I have had every 80-200 and 70-200 that Nikon has ever made. I currently own the 70-200/2.8E FL VR and find it a spectacular lens in every respect and well worth its price. This is the most used lens in my kit. I also own, and use upon occasion, the F4 version. It is just not as good as the E FL version, but it IS a lot lighter. YMMV. Best of luck.


It is indeed an extraordinary lens in every way. However, I do believe it is over priced at almost $2800.
Go to
Mar 7, 2018 13:51:27   #
dandekarv wrote:
I am thinking buying Nikon 24-70 f 2.8 lens. There is a big price difference between VR and non VR lens. Wondering if it is necessary to have VR lens? Does it justify the price difference?

Can some experts give some insight?


Vasant


If you would consider third party lenses I have an excellent recommendation. But if not, I'll just keep quiet and refer you back to my original reply.
Go to
Mar 7, 2018 13:44:31   #
billnikon wrote:
I was just next to a guy trying out the Sony a9, 20 frames a second and you can put it in silent mode and not hear a thing. He was using the Sony 100-400 and he was getting some amazing shots of birds in flight, he was experimenting with different focusing modes, he was moving from a full frame Canon with a new the newer 200-400 and the 600 f4 Canon lenses. He felt the results were favorable.
I was shooting beside him with my Nikon D500 with the 200-500 Nikon lens and I felt their was no difference in the shots. But I am no expert, but, his outfit weighted less than mine by quite a bit. And, Sony is releasing a new 400 mm 2.8 for their e mount. But rumor is that it will cost an arm and a leg.
And, it seems to me that Sony introduces new camera's faster than any company out their. I feel like if I buy a body it will be 2 generations old within a year. Don't get me wrong, I believe Sony is moving very fast in the mirrorless market but my Nikon is still delivering great results and with the amount of Nikon lenses that I have in my stable I will continue to stay with Nikon for now. Sony has not wowed me enough to switch, FOR NOW.
I was just next to a guy trying out the Sony a9, 2... (show quote)


Well Ken Wheeler, aka theoria apophasis or the angry phootgrapher, maintains Sony is an electronics company, not a camera company and unlike camera companies, rarely puts out firmware updates, but rather introduces new models. So your point about quick obsolescence is well taken.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 721 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.