Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: drosegarden
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 next>>
Mar 1, 2015 12:08:58   #
I forgot to say when I was commenting on the gender of the slate colored and the brown what fantastic photos these are. Besides the neat poses. you captured great color and definition of the feathers. May I ask what equipment you used in these shots?

DeAnne
Go to
Mar 1, 2015 12:04:00   #
James56 wrote:
Real Beauties Bob. Got any idea why some are slate colored and others brownish? I've seen both types and was wondering about that.


I have an old bird book that dates back to when they were called slate-colored junco. According to the book "the female junco is browner".

I love these birds also, and I always think of them as snowbirds. Whenever I see them in the spring, I always wonder if we are going to have another snow.

DeAnne
Go to
Feb 28, 2015 12:16:47   #
Nice detail on the feathers. DeAnne
Go to
Feb 28, 2015 12:13:10   #
Nice shot! Thanks for telling us how you shot it. DeAnne
Go to
Feb 27, 2015 11:00:58   #
Great photos! What lens did you use? DeAnne
Go to
Feb 26, 2015 11:54:28   #
Lovely photo! DeAnne
Go to
Feb 22, 2015 20:27:05   #
SquareRoot wrote:
I use my camera mainly for baseball.
But being snowed-in now, it is a good time
to watch thru the kitchen window for wildlife coming in to feed.
Will attach samples taken with my 70-300VRII on d5200.
The baseball pic is probably from over 340 feet.
Tho 74yo & somewhat weakened by leukemia,
I can handle the weight of the lens OK to follow baseball action.
Got a 70-200/2.8 for night baseball; it's noticeably heavier for me.


These are some wonderful photos. They do not look as if they were taken through a glass window. DeAnne
Go to
Feb 18, 2015 13:17:54   #
fosgood11 wrote:
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:


I love birds also. What type of camera and lens did you use?
Go to
Feb 18, 2015 13:13:02   #
Fantastic photos! I love the third one. I can imagine it looking down for a mouse or small bird on the ground. Do you know what type of hawk it is?
Go to
Jan 31, 2015 10:09:58   #
SonnyE wrote:
I believe that I am the most inconsistent factor in the use of my Tamron 150-600mm lens.
But, unlike the hordes before me who took a few shots (maybe), and then declared the lens "soft", I have been working to correct my behaviors and to understand how to use the lens.
And after literally thousands of shutter operations, most surrounding this lens, I'm finally getting a handle on my use with it.

It is capable of some incredibly sharp image captures. But as Regis has shown, it has an ability to have a very tight DOF (depth of field). Pinpointing one subject, while another mere inches further or shallower, will be OOF (out of focus)
I believe that factor is a delineating factor for the bad rap it got and reason it was declared as "soft".
People expected something out of the box, and when they didn't get instant gratification they Poo-Poo'd the Big Tammy.
I have 16080 operations on my camera purchased in July 2014. I typically can shoot hundreds and hundreds of shots at any given soccer game. And that, and my Humming Birds, were my reason for buying this lens on my rather limited retirement income. I had a need for range. ;)

To me, range depends on what your subject is and what you'd like to be contained in the frame. Mine is to capture a moment.
The flash of the male Humming Birds throat that is their main attractions to mate. I was lucky enough to actually observe a mating ritual unfold in my own back yard one summers afternoon. A male courting a female sitting on our service wire doing a dance. I guess he was successful, because the flew away together.
.
I believe that b I /b am the most inconsistent f... (show quote)


That humming bird photo is fantastic.
DeAnne
Go to
Jan 28, 2015 18:36:17   #
texaseve wrote:
On youtube. This is a good review. Sorry I am not able to get the live link. Canon 100-400 II vs Sigma 150-600 Sport & Tamron 150-600, Canon 400 f5.6 +Wildlife Photography Tips


This was an excellent review. Thanks so much for letting me know about it.

DeAnne
Go to
Jan 28, 2015 18:35:05   #
imagemeister wrote:
This lens At f6.3, with most older camera bodies set to use f5.6 as their recommended max AF stop, will be challenged to provide speedy and accurate AF in conditions other than very good light.


Thanks for the information. The camera I'm thinking about using it on is the D7100.

DeAnne
Go to
Jan 28, 2015 11:38:09   #
A few weeks ago I, too, had problems sending a photo to gmail from iPhoto. I ended up putting the photo into a folder in documents and attaching the the photo in gmail from the folder in my documents.

DeAnne
Go to
Jan 28, 2015 11:32:46   #
Shellback wrote:
Excellent lens -
This is a few shots when I was testing mine -

http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-274802-1.html


Those are great photos Dave. I, too, am in Kansas. Since it can be bleak here sometimes in the winter I was glad to see some photos taken here because I was wondering how the lens would do in low light.

Have you tried the Tamron 150-600mm with birds flying? I have been wondering if it is a slow lens, and if it is a slow lens, will it take good photos when the birds are in flight?

DeAnne
Go to
Jan 25, 2015 11:52:23   #
DOOK wrote:
Haze is the biggest enemy at extreme ranges (as is with any long lens). However, under good lighting conditions, the 150-600mm has a longer useable range than you or I could ever use. This link will show a yacht I took at extreme range. Please read the text, & take note of the sharpness of the printing on the sails. Earl.
http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-276315-1.html


Earl, I am hoping to get a Tamron 150-600mm and was amazed when I went to your great photo to read,

"I shot it at 600mm, using a Sigma APO 2X teleconverter which increased it to 1,200mm. This, of course, is equivalent to 1,800mm on a FF body. The shot was hand held"

I had no idea that a Sigma teleconverter would work on a Tamron.

DeAnne
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.