Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: flashgordonbrown
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 26 next>>
Nov 3, 2019 01:30:00   #
CRoy wrote:
After my recent vacation and carrying my Nikon D5300 camera on a strap around my neck, I think it’s time to get a harness chest carrier. I have been looking at the Cotton Carrier and at $120, it’s a bit steep. I am looking to carry just one camera.

I would use the harness for hiking, vacations, biking, and anytime I want to be hands and neck pain free. Hiking canyons two weeks ago was tough with my camera bouncing around, and I found myself holding it steady with one hand while around my neck.

Any thoughts are appreciated!

Carol
After my recent vacation and carrying my Nikon D53... (show quote)


I have the Cotton Carrier with the extra side mount for 2 cameras total. It has served me well. I am aware of the reluctance to use the tripod socket for carrying your camera. One way around that is to get a binocular harness from a sporting goods store. Mine has nylon carabiner-type clips that connect to the strap rings on my camera. it works similarly to the Cotton Carrier in that it doesn't put the weight on your neck, and it keeps the camera close to the body and readily available for use as needed.
Go to
Oct 29, 2019 00:54:46   #
jcboy3 wrote:
I know full well. That is how a Republican gets elected without a majority vote. And why they can’t claim a mandate. And why it’s okay to impeach them.


He won going away by the rules in play-sounds like a mandate to me! If you want confirmation, just look at the map of the US- how much is s RED and how much is blue-it even looks like a MANDATE. It may not be what you wanted to happen, but that's what did happen. I didn't particularly want Obama to be president for 8 years, but he was and I didn't whine and cry about it. I just hung in there until the next election. My vote didn't count anyway, since I live in the 'People's Republic of Puget Sound', where 1 metropolitan area carried the whole region.
Go to
Oct 28, 2019 14:54:37   #
jcboy3 wrote:
It's a matter of expediency and principal. Trump is a bad person, but a worse President. He should never have been elected, but he wasn't elected by a majority of voters, so he can't claim a mandate for bad behavior. Potty mouthed, peurile, nominally dangerous, and demonstrably divisive. Impeachment is the moral thing to do, even if Republicans will stand in the way of removal.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/impeachment-is-the-lesser-evil/2019/10/20/77bd99dc-f1b8-11e9-8693-f487e46784aa_story.html
It's a matter of expediency and principal. Trump ... (show quote)


Your statement that he wasn't elected by a majority of the voters shows a decided misunderstanding of the electoral college system. The Electoral College is in place to prevent high population locales from rigging elections. Every state has electoral votes based on their population. Once a candidate has won those votes by a plurality of the votes, getting more votes in that state is irrelevant. Thus the popular vote isn't neccesarily the deciding factor. The people in the high-population states got the electoral votes they earned, just the people in the lower population states got the electoral votes that they earned. So much for today's lesson in civics.
Go to
Oct 28, 2019 14:05:05   #
AndyH wrote:
I don't know anything about the Agfa numbering, but as to this question, the TIFF file is lossless, while the JPEG is lossy. That means that if you edit and resave JPEGs, there is a loss of information with each save. I've seen this in as few as five resaves. The TIFF provides a lossless image, which you can work on in your processing software, then export as a JPEG, when no further changes need to be made. That's a very similar workflow to the way I process RAW files. If you don't plan on doing much work with the files, it's perfectly acceptable to save them as JPEGs, which take up a lot less disk space, but since I have a large amount of space and like to fiddle with my images, I'll continue to save the original files as originals. Others may have different thoughts and processes.

Andy
I don't know anything about the Agfa numbering, bu... (show quote)

Or you can copy your JPEGs and work on the copy, leaving the originals untouched (opening and closing JBEGs doesn't cause any loss of information).
Go to
Oct 1, 2019 13:26:59   #
kpmac wrote:
A flower on some weeds. A good reason not to discount the value of weeds.


I've always believed that any plant can be considered a weed if it is in a place where it isn't wanted, and any "weed" can be welcome if you want it wherever it is !
Go to
Sep 18, 2019 02:59:56   #
Joe Blow wrote:
The minimum focus appears to be 1.3 ft / 0.38 M. That would be from the object to the focal plane. I don't think there is a dedicated mode for macro, just the minimum focus. (The focal plane is a circle with a long line through it, located on the top of the camera. It represents the sensor on a DSLR or film on a SLR. This is for those who actually measure the distance. Some newer cameras may not have this mark.)
https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sony-18-70-3p5-5p6-m15/3 .

This appears to be an older and different from the lens referenced by jerryc41. Your's appears to be a rebranded, old Konica-Minolta lens Sony inherited when they bought them out.

If it still works and the images make you happy then enjoy. Few of these older lenses have Image Stabilization but do have good optics.
The minimum focus appears to be 1.3 ft / 0.38 M. T... (show quote)


Your reference to image stabilization in relation to Konica-Minolta lenses is really invalid, because Konica-Minolta, and subsequent Sony A mount dslrs all have in-body stabilization (IBIS), rendering in-lens stabilization unnecessary.
Go to
Aug 16, 2019 12:38:51   #
Collhar wrote:
Pollock????? Are you some kind of stupid???


Yeah, I found that statement a bit fishy myself- for Pollock, a can of housepaint and a wooden floor constituted a 'fine art' masterpiece! I never understood the attraction! Goes to show how unsophisticated I am!
Go to
Aug 10, 2019 14:46:10   #
Atually, maturity does remedy that- it's age thst doesn't!
Go to
Jun 23, 2019 16:19:23   #
Frank T wrote:
So Bill,
How many children have to die before we use that word?


Well, none would have to die if their parents/caregivers wouldn't bring them into the US illeagaly!
Go to
Jun 21, 2019 11:57:01   #
mwsilvers wrote:
Was he nasty to you? Did he not respond to your question with the appropriate feedback? What was gruff about his response? Did you need him to hold your hand and tell you how very very sorry he was before he told you to call the vendor? How would his answer have changed if he first asked if you were a customer. Seems to me you called and found out very quickly that you needed to call the vendor. Nothing at all happened that was worthy of you complaining to us about it.


Apparantly you don't understand the concept of "customer service". While I have no experience with B & H, I do have experience in customer service at a large photo retailer in Los Angeles many years ago. There was NEVER any excuse to reply gruffly or curtly to someone, either in person or on the phone. It was up to us to take the 'high road' in any conversation, no matter what was going on in our lives at the moment. And yes, what happened in this case IS worthy of complaint and discussion. If we don't speak up when we feel there's a problem, we eliminate any possibility of improvement in the situation.
Go to
May 21, 2019 14:16:57   #
Strange wrote:
No matter the brand, never buy "Grey Market" unless the equipment is disposable. The US importer won't fix it and won't sell parts to fix it, but you can return it to Japan. Don't hold your breath on that one! The chance of you ever seeing your equipment again are slim and none.


As usual, blanket statements are misleading: yes, Nikon says that they won't service "grey" Nikon products even if you are willing to pay, but that doesn't hold true with other brands. My experience is with Sony, and I've been pleasantly surprised with their policies: I have an A77 which I bought "grey" when it first came out. In the process of cleaning the mirror, I damaged it. When I contacted Sony, I explained the situation(grey market and my fault for the damage) and got a price quote for the repair. I sent it off to them and a week or so later received notification that the repair was complete and they would be returning my camera shortly. I inquired as to the cost, and was told that there would be no charge! I further inquired as to what had been done, and was informed that the mirror had been replaced and the camera had been checked for any other malfunctions! Needless to say I'm a happy Sony user! You need to be aware that the Nikon repair policy only applies to Nikon USA-anywhere else in the world will have different policies.
Go to
May 18, 2019 14:12:18   #
Any thoughts that I would ecpress would fall under the 'nit-picking' catagory. However, I do have a couple of thoughts: first, in printing, I would crop differently. Either go full figure(showing the feet, or crop tighter(just below the waist). The current crop is slightly awkward. Second, I would turn the bodies at more of an angle to the camera-especially the wife. Having the body square to the camera is a bit 'snapshot-ish'. These suggestions come from a number of years of shooting family portraits on a volume basis(25-30 sittings per day, 5 days a week 40-45 weeks per year)! I didn't always follow the advise above, but I tried!
Go to
May 17, 2019 13:47:34   #
imagemeister wrote:
I know there are not many here on the hog using full frame A-mount. Those that are, I wonder what the GOOD opinions are for 20-24mm prime or zoom range that are AFFORDABLE ($500 or less used). I just moved to the A99 and currently use the older Tamron SP 20-40 f2.7-3.5 which seems pretty good to me. I would like to think the Sigma 24mm 2.8 prime super wide II is a viable lens ??

Thanks for your help, ....Larry
.


I have the Sony 28-75/2.8 that I got to use with my 850 body. It is an outstanding lens, and the one that I leave on the camera as a 'standard/walk around' lens.l'm at this point dithering between the A99xx or one of the 7s.I really enjoy using the multiple-axis screen on the A77s, so the 7s tilting screen is limited. Age and mobility issues came into play here!
Go to
Mar 30, 2019 13:13:06   #
Kmgw9v wrote:
I owned a Hasselblad 500C, Mamiya C330, and a Yashica Mat 124G; but I always wanted, and never used, a Roleiflex TLR.


As the in-house photographer for World Vision in the '60s, I had use of a Rollei 2.8. I added the eye-level prism and pistol grip and in that configuration, it was a great rapid shooting 2 1/4 camera. It would take 220 film, but the frame counter only went to 12, so you had to reset it after 12 frames. This procedure caused me to make a grevious mistake at a wedding - I shot the first 12, reset the counter, shot 12 more, then forgetting that I had already shot the second 12, I reset the counter again and shot 12 'phantom' images of the posed formal shots! This was particularly bad for 3 reasons: I didn't realize that I had done this until the proofs came back, the bride was a coworker at World Vision, and many of the people in the wedding party had come varying distances to participate, thus were unavailable for a reshoot! It was a hard, humbling experience!
Go to
Mar 24, 2019 01:15:04   #
Joelwexler wrote:
Whatever it's worth


Please-You need to set a price, and snide answers are discourteous. We can easily find the price for a new one, and eBay can give us a price range for used, but that doesn't tell us how much you want.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 26 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.