Wellhiem wrote:
Give it a couple of months, and the rest of the world will be saying "Hahahahaahhahhaaaaaaaaa Hahahahaahhhhahaahahaaa DONALD TRUMP IS YOUR PRESIDENT".
In a couple months the world will be saying, lucky USA Obama isn't your president anymore.
Compatibility of Camera Window DC, EOS Utility and Map Utility with Mac OS X v10.12 Sierra
I received this email from Canon:
Canon Information Update
Apple recently released Mac OS X v10.12 Sierra. We have discovered some issues with the compatibility of Canon’s Camera Window DC, EOS Utility and Map Utility software programs with Mac OS X v10.12 Sierra that may cause certain functions of such Canon software not to work.
Before upgrading your OS to Mac OS X 10.12 Sierra, please review the compatibility chart here.
This information is for residents of the United States and its five territories only. If you do not reside in the USA or its five territories, please contact the Canon Customer Support Center in your region.
Thank you,
Customer Support Operations
Canon U.S.A., Inc
http://www.usa.canon.com/internet/portal/us/home/support/self-help-center/canon-software?RID=1-SQJKQW&CON=1-BK4-3808&PRO=&CID=1-SI2I26
Stage Light wrote:
Looking to buy Flat bed scanner for film and slides, 35mm and 120mm
@epson.com check out their V550 for $159.00
Works great with El Capitan
Loctite Stik'nSeal it's a waterproof adhesive and it will remain useful long after other glues become hard in the tube. Use a flat toothpick to work it. home depot, amazon
Peterff wrote:
Possibly, but you can't post the pictures on UHH! Sounds like a David Hamilton kind of thing....
Interesting, it's on the internet so it must be art, but my local democrat sheriff wouldn't see it that way- thanks ron
[quote=Peterff]Why? An SD card is not a CF card, is not a microSD card...
Speed is only one factor, so your comment was rather overly simplistic and based on unstated assumptions.
If the OP knew anything about the differences between cards he would know why what he was told was problematic. Providing overly simplified answers doesn't always help.
So no pair of slacks, maybe an old sock at best!
A girl in a old sock, now there's a fetish worth looking in to.
ole sarg wrote:
I didn't say anything I only presented you with some facts. BTW just google epa suing koch and you will see that they are!
One's ignorance can be overcome by doing some research. I suggest you try that.
The Koch has agree to pay a lot in fines, so the EPA appears to be doing their job. I would like to know why the government didn't find, catch these situations at an earlier time. My point is, if the government can find by inspection these messes at a point that fines and clean ups are required why not stop it by inspection before it gets out of hand. Still most of this is past tense.
ole sarg wrote:
I didn't say anything I only presented you with some facts. BTW just google epa suing koch and you will see that they are!
One's ignorance can be overcome by doing some research. I suggest you try that.
I didn't find any current court activity. Found most of what you posted and most of that happened during 2000-2003, a 2013 $380,000 fine at a refinery and 2014 very complimentary EPA statement about the Koch actions at Flint Hills.
What i didn't find was Satan or Shiva and Kali. I didn't find a rightwing conspiracy to kill the earth for profit.
Reddog wrote:
Careful now. They start name calling when they are shown facts they don't like!
Another clueless liberal, calling someone ignorant of the truth is not name calling. Another form is like stating unproved accusations as facts. Your information is subjective at best.