Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: mtbear
Page: <<prev 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 32 next>>
Jun 11, 2016 11:10:29   #
I've used Wacom and other tablets for a couple of decades, I have never had much success with other brands than Wacom. I've used every thing from 12x18 down to the 4x5 I have now. You might try saving the manual as PDF and printing that, I'm not certain since I haven't needed a manual in so long. To get a feel for it, I've recommended this before, use a puzzle app. Basic "play a game with it" learning philosophy. I use it primarily for Illustrator and not much for PhotoShop but that is just me.
Go to
Jun 2, 2016 19:07:12   #
romanticf16 wrote:
It may have been scanned "flopped" because it was a Kodachrome,which has ridges of emulsion visible? Scanning it flopped prevented any distortion in the scan.


I've been involved with photography since 1963, publishing since 1972 and digital photography since 1993 and I've never heard of such a thing. I think it's probably a rationalization for having done the job incorrectly.
Go to
Jun 2, 2016 16:41:12   #
rdgreenwood wrote:
Phew! I was afraid you were going to include Enjoying BASIC, a book I wrote for Harper & Rowe. The publisher predicted sales of 200,000 copies; within a month of releasing it, Pascal came along and the BASIC market went bye-bye. We sold fewer than 20,000.


I did a lot of Apple ][ programing (as well as other platforms) in the 80s and I detested Pascal because it had no direct interaction with the machine. If you wanted to access memory you had to create a file then read or write it, no peek and poke there. If you consider most of my programs were written as machine code hidden in REM statements with control in BASIC you'll understand why I didn't like Pascal. The first line of code erased the entire program if you listed it as a form of copy protection. When I had my choice I used Promal which was a C-like language which allowed direct program interaction with screen memory.
Go to
Jun 2, 2016 15:56:18   #
Depending on what you will use the image for the best option may be to re-scan it. Film scanning is designed to scan the emulsion side of the film and if it was scanned backwards it means the substrate side was scanned. This can leave images slightly soft. If that isn't a problem then flip it and do a little sharpening.
Go to
May 31, 2016 17:25:19   #
http://www.tomsguide.com/answers/id-2256390/avi-problems-premiere-elements.html
Go to
May 31, 2016 17:21:22   #
Jeff Smith 1 wrote:
I select the photos I wish to export to the Mac, go to File/Export and then I have an option of either "Export nn photos" or "Export Unmodified Original ...".


You seem to be a bit confused by the process. You don't export files from the iPhone to the Mac you import files from the iPhone to the mac. Think of it as a point of view problem. The process is controlled by the Mac not the iPhone. Just press the import button when Photos come up. Once Photos has them then you can export them to any place you want with the File/Export menu command.
Go to
May 31, 2016 17:06:52   #
Mostly things you already know but overlook.

http://petapixel.com/2015/05/19/44-tips-to-improve-your-photography
Go to
May 31, 2016 17:04:26   #
Matching Kodak film to application and where to get it processed.

http://petapixel.com/2016/05/26/kodaks-professional-film-app-pocket-guide-kodak-film-lovers
Go to
May 28, 2016 15:51:19   #
I try to be observant in all directions but down is just so easy. I got some better images from days previous to this challenge.


Go to
May 24, 2016 15:30:17   #
Simple solution: open Photos. Select all images in last import folder. Choose File:Export:Export Unmodified Original. You will be able to easily add the exported files to LightRoom.

Process your job.
Now figure out what changed.
Go to
May 23, 2016 15:43:35   #
Adobe Flash is an abomination, always has been. I say turn and run like hell from any program that requires it. Find a more intelligent alternative.
Go to
May 16, 2016 13:21:54   #
Egrets are fun. There is a rookery a few miles from me. They feed on the lakes around me and return to the rookery at night.
Go to
May 9, 2016 15:45:14   #
rook2c4 wrote:
90%? I can't imagine how one would measure creativity in a meaningful way as to be able to give it a specific quantitative value. However, I do agree - much magic can happen in the darkroom.


The magic is in your head not the darkroom.
Go to
May 2, 2016 14:53:47   #
Mostly for newbies.

http://www.gizmag.com/understanding-camera-button-dial-guide/42978/?utm_source=Gizmag+Subscribers&utm_campaign=e5a75fdb45-UA-2235360-4&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_65b67362bd-e5a75fdb45-90659957
Go to
May 2, 2016 14:49:31   #
May day was quite rainy so I took little more than my usual 10 images for a time-lapse project I'm working on but I did take several images of our rain soaked irises. I have been using LR mainly as a cataloging tool but this day I decided to try a little PP. After I got the image the way I wanted it I decided it might look good in B&W. I find LR's B&W tools very limited so I passed the image to PS, another first for me. I've been doing B&W conversions in PS since before forever and it is nice to have all the tools I learned to use manually located in an adjustment layer.

original

(Download)

LR PP

(Download)

PS PP

(Download)
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 32 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.