Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Dual Card Slot Use
Page <<first <prev 6 of 6
Oct 2, 2018 12:54:52   #
SpyderJan Loc: New Smyrna Beach. FL
 
cjc2 wrote:
When I use the second slot, it is a combination of your option 1 AND dual cards - RAW to one and JPEG to the other. As I use 128GB XQD cards, I really don't run out of room on any one shoot/game. Best of luck.


My setup also.

Reply
Oct 2, 2018 15:34:08   #
zcarxrg Loc: Corpus Christi
 
[quote=baygolf]I was just wondering how people use their camera with dual card slots. Now I understand for paid jobs you would use one for backup (option #2), but for just shooting around, e.g., vacation, parties, general shooting, etc. What configuration do you use:

1. Auto switch (when one card gets full switches to next card)
2. Record to multiple cards
3. Only record to the selected card[/quote

I always use one card for raw ( CF card in my Canon cameras) and the other (SD) for Jpeg. The SD card with jpegs allows for a backup, a jpeg that can be viewed on in any computer with an SD slot and allows me to keep shots on the SD in camera for quite awhile in case I have a reason to show a shot from the recent past while "in the field".
I use a 128gb card for raw and usually a 64gb card for the jpeg images. If I had a limitation with my cards I would save raw only because my workflow never requires immediate image transfer. My birds and wildlife do not care when (or if) their images are seen.

Reply
Oct 2, 2018 16:13:44   #
juan_uy Loc: Uruguay
 
Looks like I am the only until now that will answer this:
I shoot RAW+JPEG to both slots.

Why?
- Cause I am a newbie
- Cause I don't need burst
- Cause memory is cheap enough and there is time to delete
- I haven't find a reason to do it differently

(Edit: corrected spelling mistake know-now)

Reply
 
 
Oct 2, 2018 16:41:17   #
SharpShooter Loc: NorCal
 
gwilliams6 wrote:
I shoot raw +jpeg, but to different cards. The jpegs are easier to process and show clients and share online quickly, even at the event. While the raw are what I use for the finished product. But my jpegs are quality enough that I could still use them if anything happened to the raw images. And yes I did once have a raw card go down and the jpegs were fine for the client after some post processing. Cheers

I think we’re doing the exact same thing.
Except that not all of my shoots need to be publication ready. Only in shoots where I don’t control the content get a Jpeg copy so they can be immediately posted if necessary.
ALL of my fine art shoots(for my own portfolio) get a Raw copy.
No way in the world will I work from a stunted Jpeg, no matter how good the Jpeg is, when I can work from a raw. I can always convert if I was dying to work from a Jpeg!!!
By now we all know what works best for each of us and Jpegs SUCK!!! LoL
SS

Reply
Oct 2, 2018 17:34:11   #
markngolf Loc: Bridgewater, NJ
 
I did that for many years. Nothing wrong with doing it that way. It's a personal choice.
Mark
juan_uy wrote:
Looks like I am the only until now that will answer this:
I shoot RAW+JPEG to both slots.

Why?
- Cause I am a newbie
- Cause I don't need burst
- Cause memory is cheap enough and there is time to delete
- I haven't find a reason to do it differently

(Edit: corrected spelling mistake know-now)

Reply
Oct 5, 2018 07:08:51   #
dickwilber Loc: Indiana (currently)
 
I shot for decades without a backup on film; then I went digital and shot without a backup (one card slot). During that period, I went from rank amateur to advanced amateur, to pro, shooting sports, social events and weddings. I always carried a second camera as a back-up, but made only one recording of an image at a time! Shooting digital, I shot primarily jpg's as I always had to turn the images over quickly, and use as little post processing as possible--- get it right in the camera! When, after having been retired for a couple of years, I bought a D800, I suddenly had two slots and the ability to record a backup image. I immediately set up to record one jpg and one raw, which has worked very well for me. My jpg's are properly exposed and composed and are all I need for the vast majority of the images I take. The raw images are there whenever I have less than an optimum image to work with, or need to create a larger than usual print, or do something more creative in post processing. This is the best of all possible worlds.

During the years while shooting many thousands, perhaps millions, of digital images recorded on CF cards, I only had two images I knew that I did I shoot (out of several hundred shot that event) not show up when I down-loaded the card. I never figured out what happened so I retired that card and the problem never recurred. I find that there is no reason to record duplicates on a second card to protect against card failure! (I use Sandisk cards exclusively and swear by them.)

Reply
Oct 8, 2018 12:58:23   #
drklrd Loc: Cincinnati Ohio
 
Robertl594 wrote:
A bit of a long story but an explanation of why I use slot 2 for still backup and where I have my videos recorded. This is from a previous post.

I just returned from a 3 week photo trip and captured some photos that I was pleased with. I stored them on a WD EasyStore 4 TB drive that was 3 weeks old. When I got home, I plugged it in to import my photos to Lightroom to find that my hard drive failed. Severe hardware failure. I did have about 1200 of the 2022 NEFs still on my XQD cards, but I was missing over 800 raw images, and of course, some of my better shots. I could feel that sweaty panic in my stomach and the dizziness developing as I realized that I was probably SOL and stuck with low res exports that I created for temporary web viewing. Devastated, I sent in my drive to a data recovery company who rapidly replied that the could save my data. After negotiating to the best price I could, I agreed to pay the $1,000 fee, today.

Tonight, for some reason, I took the SD card out of my second slot and stuck it into my computer. To my delight, all of my images were on the SD card! When I set up my new camera, I had chosen to save a backup on the second card. In my haste of devastation, I completely forgot that I had done this. I am relieved and pleased.

So for those of you who think that the second drive is not that important, it probably is not, until you need it! Nikon Mirrorless with one slot, maybe you will figure out how to correct this.
A bit of a long story but an explanation of why I ... (show quote)



I use the second slot just for that reason and because I have had cards fail when taking from camera to computer. Which is why I have not upgraded from the Nikon D7200 to the D7500. They left out a slot and gave you a tilt view screen. Was not the bonus I was looking for in an upgrade model. Sorry it cost you so much to get the drive data. The rule ever since computers came out is always have a second copy. It's been that way all the way back to the 8086 computer and even earlier when data was capture on tape machines.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 6
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.