Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: blanam
Page: 1 2 3 next>>
Feb 2, 2024 15:46:07   #
imagextrordinair wrote:
For 24 and 50mm side shots, F 5, strait on F4

At 200mm, F2 (prime) or 2.8 (70- 200 zoom)

Blurry or Bokeh is something assumed? Unless your at a car show, or the background is just plain bad sure, but location is most times a main consideration for the shoot.


<< These numbers don't compute for me >>.
In order to get a 20ft horizontal Field of View (to view the whole side of a car), using a 200mm lens, you'd need to be 112' away. At f2.0 your Depth of Field would be 11ft.
Go to
Jan 31, 2024 16:40:54   #
If it's protection you are after, I'd suggest using a clear protection filter:
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?q=clear%20protective77mm%20filter&sts=ma
As mentioned by others, a UV filter alters hue of the image, while not adding any value when digitally processing.
Go to
Oct 26, 2023 14:41:26   #
gwong1 wrote:
This is my interpretation of the event. Gary


Very nice. Well done.
Go to
Jun 4, 2023 14:04:10   #
capmike wrote:
I just was with my daughter to attend my grandson’s graduation. I didn’t take many photos, but my daughter did. Not a great camera, but good enough for snapshots. While reviewing her photos, she asked me a question I not only couldn’t answer, but would love to have answered for myself: Why, when taking the same photo, seconds or less apart, is one photo more underexposed than the next? No change in settings, no change in light, yet the two photos are noticeably different. She’s using an old Canon, I’m using a Z9, and it happens to both of us. Would love to hear anyone’s thoughts.

Thanks,

Mike
I just was with my daughter to attend my grandson’... (show quote)


Mike,

You're not truly in Manual mode if your using auto ISO.

So, it's been asked, but not answered. Are all three legs (Shutter, Aperture and ISO) exactly the same on the under exposed as the proper exposed? If they are and "No Flash" (especially in the case of the Z9), then the scene's lighting has changed or the camera's failing. I would doubt the latter.

In the case of your older Canon, it's not clear to me that you're saying the three settings also haven't changed. If your daughter's shooting program and evaluative/Matrix, there's more room for different outputs, as composition (framing) changes can alter the total light hitting the sensor, but Matrix would be less sensitive to micro composition changes than say spot.

Please post the good v. bad pic along with all exposure exif data.
Go to
Oct 3, 2021 17:43:04   #
Timothy S wrote:
I have gotten overwhelming response, and I am very grateful for everyone’s helpful comments and kindness. I should clarify though that I am 100% satisfied with my equipment. Actually pretty thrilled with it. My question actually was about the awkward position that I felt I was in, trying to put out professional quality work and frustrated at the label of “entry level” with a truly great camera. One commenter said it is a firm enthusiast level, and I agree, although I always see it categorized at top tier entry level. The answer was probably correct that it is the manufacturer trying to get people to buy the label with the bells and whistles perhaps unnecessarily. Also my T7i has optional tutorials on the screen, though I never needed that. Therefore it is good for newbies who want a great camera ongoing.
I have gotten overwhelming response, and I am very... (show quote)


In summary:
Presenting a professional image can be important and you haven't determined a real TECHNICAL NEED to upgrade. But, until you know what you're missing (or not missing) it'll be hard to satisfy that curiosity. I might suggest that you rent a 90D or a more impressive camera and do a hands on comparison. https://www.lensrentals.com/rent/canon-90d
Go to
Feb 4, 2021 12:27:28   #
Jimmy T wrote:
Cassidy:
Good luck, and enjoy yourself!
Now, I can see that you have received a lot of great equipment advice.
So the most important advice I can give you is to develop a shot list for each location.
Next, is to shoot as MANY of the shots ahead of time that you can. You want to enjoy yourself too.

These ideas were gleaned from the UHH wedding site from another MUCH WISER & EXPERIENCED UHH member than me.
I apologize for not remembering their name to give them credit.
For the ceremony, reception, etc. scout the locations and take test shots at each location, lit the same as you will find on the big day.

Some Possible Wedding Poses:
(Cut and paste & use as you see fit)

1. At the groom’s house
 Groom, getting ready,
 groomsmen, playing around
 Groom, in mirror
 The groom dressed, GQ pose W/Jacket over the shoulder
 Groom full length
 Groom with Mother close-up
 Groom with Father close-up
 Groom with both Parents full length
 Groom with both Parents close-up
 Groom with Grandparents full length
 Groom with Grandparents close-up
 Groom with Sisters / Brothers
 Groom with immediate family
 Groom and Best Man full length
 Groom and Best Man close-up
 Groom and Best Man shaking hands
 Groom and all Groomsmen

2. At the bride’s house
 Bride dressing
 Mother helping with veil
 Mother/Maid of Honor adjusting veil
 Bride looking in the mirror
 Bride with Mother looking in the mirror
 Bride putting on garter with Bridesmaids looking on
 Bride full length
 Bride half-length
 Bride close-up
 Bride with Mother close-up
 Bride with Mother full length
 Bride pinning corsage on Mother
 Bride with Father full length
 Bride with Father close-up
 Bride pinning-on Father’s button-hole flower
 Bride with both Parents, full length
 Bride with both Parents, close-up
 Bride with Grandparents close-up
 Bride with Grandparents full length
 Bride with Sisters
 Bride with Brothers with immediate family
 Bride and Maid of Honor full length
 Bride and Maid of Honor Close-up
 Bride with Attendants
 Bride with Flower Girl/Ring Bearer
 Bride leaving the house with Parents and Bridesmaids
 Father helping Bride into the limo

The ceremony
 Flowers
 Singers
 Groups of guests and everybody
 Flower Girl walking down the aisle
 Ring-Bearer walking down the aisle
 Maid of Honor walking down the aisle
 Bridesmaids walking down the aisle
 Father walking down the aisle with Bride
 Father “giving the Bride away”
 Bride and Groom exchanging vows
 Bride and Groom exchanging rings
 Bride and Groom kiss
 Bride signing register
 Groom signing register
 Bride and Groom walking back down the aisle
 Bride and Groom outside the church
 Bride and Groom getting into the limo

Formal photos
 Wedding party in place (front & back)
 Bride alone full length
 Bride alone ¾
 Bride alone close-up
 Bride alone headshot
 Bride alone peeping over flowers
 Bride and Groom kissing
 Bride and Groom full length
 Bride and Groom close-up
 Groom full length
 Groom ¾
 Groom close-up
 Close-up of rings
 Group shot of Bride & Attendants/Bridesmaids
 Groom & all Groomsmen
 Group shot of the entire family

The reception
 Wedding party announced
 Bride and Groom announced
 Bride and Groom's first dance
 Wedding party dancing
 Bride's dance with Father
 Groom's dance with Mother
 Best man toasting Bride & Groom
 Bride & Groom toasting each other
 The cake
 Bride & Groom posed at cake
 Cutting cake
 Bride & Groom feeding each other cake
 Throwing bouquet
 Bouquet catch
 Groom taking off garter
 Groom throwing garter
 Garter catch
 Bride & Groom with catchers
 Guests
 Posed departure of Bride & Groom (kissing, waving, etc.)
 Bride & Groom leaving reception venue
 Bride & Groom leaving in a limo
 Close up of invitation
 Picture of Band or DJ

Smile,
JimmyT Sends
Good Luck, You Can Do It!
Cassidy: br Good luck, and enjoy yourself! br Now,... (show quote)


Good list.
I would expand on the rings: rings alone, rings on each hand, both hands with rings.
Not sure if Cassidy is still following all of this, but if not we're all getting retrained. :-)
Go to
Feb 3, 2021 18:16:35   #
Good suggestion to make sure he includes himself in some of the PICs. A mistake I frequently make.
Go to
Feb 3, 2021 14:43:54   #
CassidyMariya wrote:
Hello! My parents want me to take pictures for there weeding in October. I just started this career and i’m only 15 but i will be 16 when i do there weeding. They will have it on a beach and at a firehouse for when we eat and stuff. I really need some ideas because i want to plan out ideas before so i know what i want to do. If you can send me some ideas i would appreciate it. Thank you 😊


Cassidy,

You have received a lot of excellent suggestions, so I'll try to not be redundant.

The harsh reality is the camera you have is a nice Point and Shoot camera.

The FZ53 can take decent pictures outdoors, but inside will be challenging if the light is not sufficient.
* the internal flash isn't real strong,
* It has no resource for external flash,
* it has no manual/semi manual shooting modes such as Program, Time, Aperture, Manual. So, the best you can do to influence the outcome is to select one of it's "Special Option" (Scene) modes:
* Beach, Fireworks, Fish-Eye Effect, Landscape, Night Landscape, Night Portrait, Panorama, Party/Indoor, Portrait, Snow, Sports, Sunset. I would highly recommend that you read the operations manual and become familiar with switching between these different scene options and using the flash.

The other control you have over the camera's auto system is what's known as "exposure compensation" which allows you to force the camera to think brighter or darker. Get familiar with this and practice its use (again, see the manual).

As I mentioned, your "built in" flash is not very powerful. It will have little effect if the subject is beyond 12' away.

Typically, you'll shoot singles and couples with the camera held in a vertical orientation (portrait)/bigger groups or scenery in a horizontal orientation (Landscape). For single and couples portraits you want to try to stand back 8' - 16' (if possible) and Zoom in to capture the amount of the subject(s) you desire. Keep in mind that if the faces have poor lighting that requires the flash, you won't be able to get back very far, as the flash will become ineffective.

FYI, your camera at 16' distance to subject provides the widest (horizontal) Field of View of ~4.5', so you can move physically forward and zoom in or out from there for the composition you want.

One last note: Although, you'll may want to get in tight to emphasize the subjects, make sure you leave some room around the outside of the subjects, i.e., don't get in too tight, as they may desire PRINTS later and you'll not have enough edge room to match the aspect ratio of the desired print (8x10, 5x7, 4x6, 3x5).

Good luck. Have fun.
Go to
Dec 5, 2020 19:45:02   #
Julius wrote:
Google Photo has a nice photo editor that does all the basics, crop, rotate(straighten), lighten/darken, as well as a nice set of color/presets. It is free.


I agree. You can drill down on the light for 7 different settings and 5 on color, plus a "pop" (contrast).
Plus cropping, rotating. NO TEXT other than comments.
Go to
Dec 25, 2019 21:34:45   #
Wingpilot wrote:
Ok, here’s some shots I took to illustrate what I’m talking about. Is it a matter of over exposure by the flash?
The first is with flash, in intelligent auto mode, the second is without flash.
I’d have posted the one I took of my wife, but I hate sleeping on the couch!!


It sure looks like the RX is not adjusting White Balance to the appropriate color temperature for the predominant light (flash ~5200-5400K).

I'm not familiar with the settings of the RX, but I would see if the White Balance is set manually to an incorrect selection, e.g. Incandescent (Tungsten).

Also, many cameras have the ability to correct White Balance to "Flash" during the shot. Check for this option.
Go to
Nov 20, 2019 19:16:14   #
willy6419 wrote:
What would you use?

I will take both

Landscape 850

Animals I’m reach impaired, will use 300 f 4, pf and tc 1.4, or 70-200 2.8 and tc 1.4

I also have, rarely use tc 2.0

I’m thinking the 850, dx mode might be slightly better for animals and if close could switch to fx and fill sensor

Seems pixels about same

Doing a week in Montana along Missouri River and Lamar Valley In December

I’ve got the landscape lenses covered

Help me pick the animal setup, realizing a 400 and more would be nice, but not realistic

Thanks
What would you use? br br I will take both br b... (show quote)


I thought I'd provide a couple of non-cropped Yellowstone Pics where I was absolutely as close or closer to the buffalo than I should have been. I was using a Full Frame camera with a 450mm lens, which would be the same as your D500 or D850 DX mode with a 300mm lens. So, these would represent the largest image you might expect. I used 630mm in some other cases and desired to crop those.




Go to
Nov 20, 2019 18:41:28   #
willy6419 wrote:
Thanks for the above data response, that's above my technical capability, these great products share so many outstanding characteristics.

My less than data driven which you supplied, assumption was that the two, in DX mode, were quite similar megapixels, both have outstanding focus, fps, high ISO capabilities.


willy6419, I think you're responding to me.

Yes, the D500 and D850 megapixel count will be close to equal, when the D850 is in Dx mode. Additionally, the D850 in Dx mode will also have a deeper Depth of Field (that of which is perceived to be in focus) 3.8 feet v. 2.5 feet.
Go to
Nov 20, 2019 18:05:52   #
cbtsam wrote:
Sorry to be ignorant, but please help me understand how "shooting in Crop Mode will increase the Depth Of Field."


cbtsam, Sorry for the delayed response.

Here's a D500 v. D850 example to explain:
Constants: Focal length 300mm, Aperture f8, Subject distance 50'

Field of view (FOV) (diagonal):
D500 = 4.6'
D850 = 7.1'

Depth of Field (DOF)
D500 = 2.504'
D850 = 3.829'

To obtain the same (lesser) 4.6' FOV on the D850 image: either crop the image in post processing or shoot in crop mode (which is merely only using the center 20.3MP of the sensor). The DOF in either case doesn't change, but remains at 2.504'/3.829' respectively.

The megapixel count of the image after cropping is about the same (D500/D850 20.9/20.3 respectively).
Go to
Nov 18, 2019 17:50:08   #
willy6419 wrote:
What would you use?

I will take both

Landscape 850

Animals I’m reach impaired, will use 300 f 4, pf and tc 1.4, or 70-200 2.8 and tc 1.4

I also have, rarely use tc 2.0

I’m thinking the 850, dx mode might be slightly better for animals and if close could switch to fx and fill sensor

Seems pixels about same

Doing a week in Montana along Missouri River and Lamar Valley In December

I’ve got the landscape lenses covered

Help me pick the animal setup, realizing a 400 and more would be nice, but not realistic

Thanks
What would you use? br br I will take both br b... (show quote)


I'd like to support the comment that Bill De made that the reach is the same whether you shoot in crop mode or crop the image later. I would add that the advantage of shooting in Crop Mode is that you can see a closer live view in the LCD.

However shooting in Crop Mode will increase the Depth Of Field, whereas shooting in Full Frame mode and cropping later will produce the more shallow DOF of the FF. So, consider your desired DOF when making the decision.

Sorry, I meant to quote comment to the original poster.
Go to
Oct 30, 2019 12:29:49   #
TSGallantPhotography wrote:
Sorry, but this is a long one but I'm hoping you will find it worth the read. Not long ago, I posted two portraits of my friend. So many kind things were said by the HH community. I wanted to tell everyone that I had her read all of the comments. Some I made her read twice (no, really, I wouldn't scroll on until she read again). She cried! By the second, she had her hand over her mouth and by the 5th she had tears which stayed until I left. She said to thank you all "for making this ol' ugly ducking feel like a swan". (I swear, that woman, lol!) Anyway, wanted to share that y'all had a part in making my friend feel as beautiful as she is.

What I hadn't included, bc I wanted all genuine reactions, is that she is a selfless hospice home care provider (for decades) and has just been diagnosed with cancer, herself. This session was agreed upon, as a gift to her children and grandchildren, before she started chemo treatments (I wasn't even aware of this, myself, at the time).

At the end she insisted I take a quick photo of her turned and waving. I kept trying to say no (didn't match my normal style and seemed silly) but she was insistent and said how important it was to her. So, I took this photo. Not a good photo, imho, but she said it was what she needed and openly sobbed when she saw it. I thought the whole thing odd but, whatever, right? I did get what I wanted so why the heck not?

It wasn't until she told me about the cancer as why she had finally agreed to the session that she explained this waving photo was for display at her funeral. That's why it was so important to her and why she wanted it just like this. Talk about feeling as if someone punched you in the gut! What an honor and a privilege.

Please, no CC on this one. I just wanted to share part of my friend, the joy you all gave her and that we don't always know the impact of what we do.
Sorry, but this is a long one but I'm hoping you w... (show quote)


Brought tears to my eyes. That's a photo you'll never forget.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.