Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: CanonAbuser
Page: 1 2 next>>
Mar 24, 2020 19:04:04   #
I was looking for an excuse to post something and remembered this Manzanita with shadow taken on the south rim of the Grand Canyon. Thanks for your post , quite nice.

Manzanita and shadow

(Download)
Go to
Aug 15, 2019 14:00:50   #
rmalarz wrote:
Unfortunately, the photo depicts Rugby, not soccer.
--Bob


The difference between rugby and soccer is that rugby players eat their dead.
Go to
Jun 7, 2019 16:22:11   #
😑
Go to
Jun 6, 2019 19:33:21   #
Sigh......
Go to
Jun 6, 2019 19:10:00   #
If I wanted to be pounded by politics I'd be staring at Facebook right now. How is this going to help me get the most out of my T6?
Go to
Apr 23, 2019 15:39:52   #
I leave them on. Otherwise I'd be taking them on and off constantly between shots.
Go to
Apr 21, 2019 23:45:26   #
I use darktable which is a free , open source , cross platform light room lookalike. I use in Windows 10 and Linux mint 19.1. Google search darkroom.
Go to
Apr 5, 2019 15:47:02   #
A little from a newb. Actually shot this in 2013 with a Fuji s602Z bridge camera, FL 8mm, f3.2, 1/125, ISO200. I had just stopped raining.


(Download)
Go to
Mar 10, 2019 17:34:11   #
As a newbie on a tight budget I'm currently getting my feet wet with darktable 2.6 in Windows and using an old version of PS (7.0). My daughter is invested in LR and a current version of PS. Darktable looks to me to be a virtual clone of LR. Am I missing something? I'm also running darktable in Linux on the same machine and bit seems a tad quicker. I also have Gimp on this pc. Which to my mind Is much too unintuitive as compared to the old version of PS. I appreciate everyone's input, there's alot of info to mull over.
Go to
Mar 5, 2019 22:35:40   #
Mark Sturtevant wrote:
The T6 on inexpensive but electrically connected extension tubes + a nifty 50mm can give you fine results. The electrical contact thru the extension tube is for full aperture control and not for focus. Focus by moving toward/ away from the subject.
I have these tubes: https://www.amazon.com/Neewer-Metal-13-21-31mm-Extension-Cameras/dp/B00GJJBO4C/ref=sr_1_fkmrnull_2?crid=DOIHD03PMKAE&keywords=neewer+extension+tubes+for+canon&qid=1551842173&s=gateway&sprefix=Neewer+Extension+tubes%2Caps%2C174&sr=8-2-fkmrnull on a f/1.8 50mm lens, and routinely get results like this: https://www.flickr.com/photos/87421607@N04/30870255236/in/dateposted-public/
It is honestly not that big a deal to get into macro. Just do it.
The T6 on inexpensive but electrically connected e... (show quote)


This looks like a viable option. Nice example.thanksfor your response.
Go to
Mar 2, 2019 17:17:04   #
Blurryeyed wrote:
Chris, if your budget is restrained you can start with a set of tubes and your 50mm, you won't have to buy expensive tubes that control focus and aperture but I would recommend it for later, and possibly for using the two lenses that came with your camera.

If you click on the flickr link below this post you can see some of my Macro the vast majority of which was done with an old Minolta film era 28mm lens reversed on to a set of M42 tubes, the cost of that set up was about $50, however I spent a bit more on the flash solution used for that set up, an off camera flash set up thanks to Yongnuo will cost you just over $100 and then an articulating arm set up would be at least that much again.
Chris, if your budget is restrained you can start ... (show quote)


Good suggestion. I'd like to try a no lens version of the MD to EOS adapter as they are advertised as macro only or at least no infinity focus. I'm curious as to how close I can get to the subject with just the adapter and 50 mm lens. I realize the tubes are a closer focus.
Go to
Mar 2, 2019 17:05:07   #
SusanFromVermont wrote:
No, not true macro. But can be cropped down and retain a good amount of detail. I just mentioned it in case you had to wait before buying a good macro lens. I recommend longer focal lengths if you are doing critters that will spook if you get too close! 105mm is good, I have a 150mm macro lens because I love to do butterflies, bees, ants, etc.


Good point, I was focused (pun intended) on the hardware , yes these images should respond well to a fair amount of cropping.
Thanks for the reminder 😊.
Go to
Mar 2, 2019 12:54:56   #
SusanFromVermont wrote:
You don't say what lenses you have besides the 50mm. If you have a longer telephoto, like 70-300mm, you can use that for close-up shots. Not as good as with a true macro lens, but still get great magnification and bokeh.


Glad you brought that up. The kit lenses are the 18 -55 is and the 75-300 zoom which I've tried. Good close ups but not really what I'd consider in the macro range.
Go to
Feb 28, 2019 14:12:26   #
I've done a fair amount of business with over the years. No camera equipment, mostly computer components. Always had good luck with them.
Go to
Feb 27, 2019 22:58:21   #
Great info everyone, thanks to all of you for passing on your experience. Sounds like there's a "gazillion" different ways to accomplish the task, some better, some preferred. Not sure which way I'm going, though, right now I'm leaning toward a "no glass" adapter for the MD 50mm 1.7 to get started. The current adapter w/glass was purchased from Adorama for about $40.00. With which I've done a few test shots. IMHO, it compares favorably to the Canon 18-55 kit lens, as a general photography piece, benefiting, I'm sure from the lower f-stop capability, so I think for the time being I'll leave the glass in the adapter. I'm a little leary of reversing the MD lens. Not sure I like exposing the inside glass to the elements. As I get further into this, I'll try to post some images and we'll see. Hopefully others will gain from the experience as well. Thanks again for sharing your expertise.
Go to
Page: 1 2 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.