Yes. Used it on my 70D and then upgraded to a 5D mk4. Obviously the latter is a better camera but the lens worked incredibly well on the 70d.
User ID wrote:
Why on earth would anyone wonder that ? I am assuming you have not been living under a rock.
What a disgusting reply. Why don’t you go and join a hate website and leave us to our desire of trying to help one another.
Wow. Amazing. Thank you so much for sharing that with us.
When I get in my office I plug my MacBook into an external keyboard, mouse and screen and plug the Ethernet cable in to get the best performance from the WiFi.
I have just purchased a MacBook Pro 15’” with the I7 processor, 16G ram and 500G SS hard drive. I upgraded from a 2014 MacBook Pro. I use 2 external drives (1 master and 1 backup) and run a 27” BenQ monitor. I use LR and Photoshop. It is expensive but a superb combination. I travel constantly and have used Mac laptops since 2001. I do not have a desktop. I just can’t say enough about how well this works, and believe the cost is well worth it if you can afford it. I could have used the 13” but like the larger screen when away from home and editing.
I keep asking the question I have never had an answer to. Can anyone on this post claim to be able to see the difference between a photo with a non filtered lens, and a filter with a lens that has a filter on it.
Yes - this is very good advice. I guess I have been a little put off by the stories that pins in the camera are easily bent by removing and refitting cards. Any comments?
Yes, I think it would probably work the same. I guess I was looking for a simple way of making one card the primary card at my choice. Thanks for your help.
This was very useful - especially about the cropping. Thank you so much.
Yes and that works perfectly thank you. I was preferring to import them direct to LR.
Thanks for the help. Incredibly I did do that (I have a 5d Mk4) and it is set as Playback 1. But this did not solve the problem. Weird.