Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: chefpat1
Page: 1 2 next>>
Oct 28, 2018 12:45:58   #
nimbushopper wrote:
Thanks Mike!

Love the smiling dog.
Go to
Oct 28, 2018 10:56:01   #
repleo wrote:
If Trump 'is simply taking advantage of the tax laws' why won't he release his tax returns? It is probably not because of his tax dodges. Its because he doesn't want the public to know his whole 'empire' is backed by Russian Oligarch funny money.

Bingo
Go to
Oct 22, 2018 20:58:02   #
markwilliam1 wrote:
Well excuse me Mr. mwsilvers! I didn’t know I’m sorry for posting!


Don't take it personally...there is one in every group.
I am new also and actually stopped posting because I thought that this forum was not newbie friendly and then I realized that most of the negative comments were coming from the same person.
Just ignore it.
Go to
Oct 22, 2018 19:17:05   #
mwsilvers wrote:
The answer is simple. YES to all, or is it NO to all? Oh my God, I'm so confused. I know I could use Google to find the answers but I'd rather have someone else do the work for me!


or...maybe they just want some human interaction. I'm pretty sure that part of the purpose of this forum is to be able to ask questions as well as answer them if you choose. I'm very sure that discouraging people from asking questions was not part of the plan.
Go to
Oct 21, 2018 01:20:25   #
jimber wrote:
So I purchased a water drop valve kit that makes water drop collisions doable. There is a lot of practice/trial and error ahead. Here are some of my first efforts.


Very nice. I was wondering what the background is in the first two images that gives that kind of bokeh?
Go to
Jul 22, 2018 07:46:56   #
Hi,
Without a doubt, the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Lens. I paid around 125 for it and it has become my fav walk around lens for street photography. Tack sharp images and takes up little space.
frjeff wrote:
Which lens(es) (that you have ever used) were the most surprisingly excellent considering what you paid for it?
Go to
Jun 25, 2018 09:45:52   #
First, they are not charging the sales tax, they are collecting it. I have always agreed that used items should not be subject to sales tax as the tax for that item was already paid when it was purchased new.
The retailers are being forced to work for the states, collecting sales tax for them, with no compensation for the time and expense they incur because of it....another thing I do not think is fair.
d3200prime wrote:
I agree. Each state charges sales tax to be used exclusively for that state's purposes for sales taxes. It's simple for me. If I purchase an item over the internet from a state which has no state sales tax base then I would not expect to be charged sales tax on that item. The fact the item is being sent to a state that taxes such items has absolutely no bearing on that transaction. Conversely, if I purchased an item over the internet from a state that charges sales tax then I would expect that states sales tax to be figured into the transaction. This is only right.

Concerning used items: If a person operates a for-profit business selling used goods then why would you believe that person should be exempt from charging sales tax?
I agree. Each state charges sales tax to be used e... (show quote)
Go to
May 19, 2018 13:45:58   #
Hi, I was actually shooting in aperture priority, I never shoot in auto and always shoot raw. I was trying to meter off the sun hoping to be able to pull some detail out of the shadows of the forefront. I do usually bracket 1 up and 1 down but the majority of my sunset photos have the sun blown out, even though the sun looks perfect, like the first shot, through the lens when I'm taking the shot..I was wondering if there was any way to use my handheld meter to improve these shots. Obviously I can't get close to the sun but maybe someone has something I haven't thought of
rpavich wrote:
Hahaha...I just got done reading 3 pages of the "why don't we use auto mode?" Thread right before opening this one...and folks were trashing those who advocate manual mode shooting. (I'm not laughing at you)

The problem is that if you allow the camera to decide on the exposure then you are in for a crap shoot for results.

If the sun is filling the field of view...you get one result, if it's 20% of the entire frame..you get something else...and you never know what.

The sun is incredibly bright as compared to all else in your scene..the dynamic range is huge. You have to decide what you want your shot to look like; sun exposed correctly and all else almost a silhouette or all else exposed correctly and the sun blown out.

I believe that Bryan Peterson's book "Understanding exposure" goes over this shot. It's worth reading.


My personal opinion is this; I don't want a steering wheel on the passenger side of the car, and I also don't want to the camera to make my decisions for me...I don't like surprises, I like consistency. So the short answer is: meter off of the sun or close to it and shoot in manual mode. The article link explains it.

http://www.digital-photo-secrets.com/tip/1219/how-to-sunset-photography/
Hahaha...I just got done reading 3 pages of the &q... (show quote)
Go to
May 19, 2018 12:54:50   #
HI, Thanks...
PHRubin wrote:
It would help us if you would check "(store original)" and click "Add Attachment". That would allow us to retrieve the EXIF data so we could evaluate better.


(Download)


(Download)
Go to
May 19, 2018 11:44:41   #
Hi All,
I was hoping someone can help me with sunset photo's. I usually wait for days when the sun is slipping in and out of clouds, avoiding bright cloudless days. When I look through my lens, usually my Canon 70-200 2.8 II with IS lens and my Mark D III, I can see the sun perfectly, the outline perfectly but when I open in photoshop, the sun is drastically overexposed to the point of not even being able to make out the outline.
What is confusing me is that sometimes the image comes out good. I can't figure it out, can anyone help?
I am including an image where it actually captured what I was seeing through the lens, the first image, as well as an example of what I am usually left with. The setting were the same.
Thanks in advance, Pat




Go to
Apr 4, 2018 09:00:36   #
I think it's awesome that you went through all the trouble to do that for them and that you worked through the issues to make sure you delivered professional results. Karma will take care of you.
They would really benefit from hooking up with one or two larger print shops that are geared up to do this type of thing every day, all day long instead of someone who is tinkering with problematic equipment and expensive materials that aren't being purchased in bulk.
A large shop would bang the job out quickly and have the ability write it off as well as publicize that they support their local art community.
Kudos to you for doing it this time and I hope you are not feeling guilty about not doing it again.
Take care, Pat

P.S. I can relate to the printer problems you had...right now I am trying to get this image to print properly( I'm just learning how to use my Canon 100) and am having a hard time understanding how to set the printer settings so that they allow Photoshop settings to control the printing.


Go to
Apr 3, 2018 08:44:31   #
Interesting...thanks for posting this...will be testing at various ISO's 400 and under to see how this works with my present projects with my Mark III.
Go to
Dec 17, 2017 19:16:22   #
I am only 2 years into dslr's so keep that in mind but I love the Canon 50 mm 1.8 that I think I only paid around 130.00 for and for just walking around that is what I usually have mounted.The images are super sharp. I have a backpack especially for camera equipment and carry all my other lens's just in case. I decided to skip the cropped frames/lower cost gear and dove right in and purchased the newest Mark 5D III, the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM , the Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 L Macro IS USM, the Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM and the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM.

I also have the Movo vest that holds the camera and love, love love it. It is especially useful as I walk with elbow crutches all the time.
If I think I will need to zoom or am shooting outside at night, I keep the 20-200 mounted. I recently spent 2 months in P-town and the Movo vest allowed me to walk around all day every day with the 20-200 mounted and suffered 0 neck or back discomfort from the weight of the camera and lens(and backpack).

I love you guys here and have learned so much from everyone. I seldom post but will when I am good enough to answer questions or share images that I am satisfied with. I am pretty far along learning Photoshop and have a good understanding of my camera but will soon be asking for help with a few issues.
Thank you all for sharing your knowledge and experience.

Edit, I think I made a mistake...am I supposed to "quote reply" so it shows which post I am answering? I need to take the time to read the rules here but have been extremely busy. I think that is the only mistake I made, sorry
Go to
Aug 9, 2017 23:49:31   #
Thank you for the suggestions. The 70-200 is definitely a challenge to balance although the ring is a little helpful. A battery grip came with my camera pkg (not a Canon grip, though) but I have not spent any time yet learning about battery grips. This is going to take a lot of time and I am trying to stay focused on learning in a sequence that makes sense even though It is hard to not keep heading off in different directions and getting ahead of myself.
Your first suggestions are where I am now,I am spending most of my time practicing with the focusing system and figuring out what I want my custom settings to be.
The rest of your suggestions are something I will have to revisit when I figure out what you are talking about.
Thank you again,
Go to
Aug 9, 2017 22:56:33   #
I also meant to say that of course there will be a period of time where I will continue using a professional photographer but I will be sneaking my successful shots in whenever possible.
Go to
Page: 1 2 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.