I shoot both, jpeg & raw, using 2 cards in my Canon. Why? 1- I just never had the time to learn raw processing, but will get there & 2- I almost always use some type of filter to “help” get the pic in the can. jpegs have been very good, good enough to many hangers around the house.
Without considering star sky photos, I am considering either zoom Canon 24-70mm or 70-200mm? I’d rather not carry both due to weight plus full frame 5D Mark IV? I’m leaning towards the 24-70 to get a wider view. I assume I can walk to get closer shots? Thanks for your help.
??? “The Best” Is the equipment you can afford and the equipment you have in your hand! The End.
I need Canon replacement batteries LP-E6N 7.2V / 1856mAh Li-ion. Has anyone had success with Non- Canon replacements? Thanx for your help.
Yes I do. Canon Pellix a manual focus camera released in 1965 that uses a semitransparent stationary reflex mirror behind which a metering cell is raised during the reading. It was Canon’s first TT.
Nice and crisp. Just curious, hand-held? Tripod? or Monopod? I prefer hand-held when ever possible, don't like lugging T or M pod. But, getting older and hand-held is becoming difficult with a 250 or 400mm lens without external support. Thanx.
Another wonderful shot & the Patsy Cline reference ….. over the moon!
Perfect. Just the info I needed. Your info is always spot on; read it every day
What are the pros and cons of using the RF100-500 zoom with EF adaptor on a Mark IV vs the EF 100-400?
Much appreciated & I live in NYC & upstate for many years & understand about the cold & winters.
Thank you. Your response and others you have posted are to the point & informative.
Is it unreasonable to substitute the Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.4 L IS II for the Canon EF 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II?. My kit is all Canon, EOS Mark 5D IV, EF 24-70mm F2.8 L IS II, and EF 70-200 f/2.8mm (I do not own the EF 100-400mm, yet) and usually carry both lenses when photo hunting including Family, vacations, on-foot & bicycle jaunts around SE Florida. I’ve been shooting since High School, am approaching 70, and I do not for see an EOS R camera in my future. The 28-70 lens is wonderful as is the 100-400, but I would have to sell the 28-70 to get the 100-400. There is a 1.25ft difference in close focusing distance (100-400 is closer), increase of 0.6Lb in carry weight, and very different aperture ranges particularly in low light situations. What am I missing and why am I asking the UHH community? Because there is always someone who is wiser and a different perspective can be very enlightening.
Once in a lifetime opportunity.