Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Photo Critique Section section of our forum.
Posts for: par4fore
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 102 next>>
Mar 28, 2024 13:05:27   #
Lee filter holder 100x100.
Adapter rings 77mm, 82mm (other sizes available on eBay).
Lee 100x150 .75soft grad.
Calumet coral3 soft grad and Sunset2.
Think Tank case with rain cover.
Private Message only.
115.00 + 15.00 shipping.
Packed with care and shipped prompt.
Please see my feedback.
Everything is in excellent condition!


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)
Go to
Jan 11, 2024 06:23:53   #
Nice!
Go to
Jan 7, 2024 08:14:31   #
👀 for a 500-1000 CF for under 200 might get lucky at garage sales. Check Induro brand.
Go to
Check out AI Artistry and Creation section of our forum.
Dec 28, 2023 06:19:38   #
Great work, lovely personality comes through.
Go to
Dec 24, 2023 09:55:55   #
Leinik wrote:
To be frank, none of these would be my solutions of choices and here are the reasons why:
1-the point and shoot is more than 10 years old and may fail or at least be more restricted in tis possibilities (regarding dynamic range for instance which can be an issue in Portugal–white walls, sea, and sun, I have been to the places you are mentioning)
2-the Canon means bulky (and "visible") equipment that you may have to carry all the time. There are easier solutions but that would entail an investment.
Bottom line, without investing, I would go for the 70D and the 24-105 that will cover 98% or your needs.
To be frank, none of these would be my solutions o... (show quote)


IMO the 11-20 is most important.
Go to
Dec 24, 2023 09:51:39   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
Take the 70D, the 11-20 and the 24-105. You don't need the longer lens nor the 50m on that body. Have fun!


Was there in Sept, 10 days. Agree with this.
I used my D850 with a 21mm and my Sony RX100 24-200

https://flic.kr/s/aHBqjAWJKS
Go to
Dec 22, 2023 08:07:01   #
No lens? no battery? no photos?
Go to
Check out Sports Photography section of our forum.
Dec 20, 2023 06:26:19   #
One of your best!
Go to
Dec 13, 2023 06:55:40   #
ackvil wrote:
I have a good friend who is planning a vacation to Alaska. He knows nothing about photography. He will be on a cruise ship and has several excursions planned. Much to my surprise, his budget is under $1,000. Any recommendations?


Sony RX100 VI (M6)
Large sensor
Fits in pocket
24-200
Built in flash that tilts up.
This is the best of all worlds
Go to
Dec 13, 2023 06:48:09   #
[quote=midnightlight]I feel you (we) should post whatever we want. If you're offended, don't look.

Tom[/quote
??
Go to
Dec 10, 2023 17:24:28   #
What would be said if this was a male in the same pose.
Good pic but not artful.
Go to
Check out Landscape Photography section of our forum.
Nov 18, 2023 16:37:40   #
Listed on EBay so dropping price here to $235.00
Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5G ED VR Lens
Full Frame!
Purchased at B+H Photo used condition (9+).
Mint condition as purchased.
I thought I would use this for family photos on my D850 but never did.
Includes: Box, hood, case, front cap, rear cap, UV filter, book.

Private message if interested.
PayPal or cleared check. 275.00 + 18.00 shipping. (USPS Priority Mail)

Check my feedback and thanks for looking.


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)
Go to
Nov 12, 2023 07:46:44   #
Pm sent
Go to
Sep 20, 2023 19:49:36   #
PaulG wrote:
There's got to be a limit on reposting the same stuff though, hasn't there?


Go to
Sep 13, 2023 07:41:14   #
jerryc41 wrote:
Yes, controversial, but I saw these reasons online from Peta Pixel.

1. Handling is not very good on a phone, but a camera is easy to hold, and it has controls that let you make changes easily.
2. The view. The viewfinder of new, mirrorless cameras shows you how changes in settings will affect the final picture. The flip-screen lets you get up or down shots more easily than when using a phone.
3. The flash. Although new cameras seem to be omitting the pop-up flash, it is possible to add a flash unit to the camera. That flash can also be used off-camera to put the light at a different angle. The best you can do with a phone is a small, weak flash.
4. The lens. A modern cell phone might have three separate lenses, but the quality and control aren't as good as what's available for cameras.
5. DOF and bokeh are also lacking in phones, compared with cameras. Selecting a different lens or aperture changes the results you get in the image. That amount of control isn't available with a phone.
6. Movement. The cell phone camera likes to be held steady because it takes multiple shots when you push the button. It's also difficult to follow fast action with a phone, especially considering the multiple shots it takes each time.
7. Selfies. Using the phone for a selfie means using the phone's forward-facing camera, the one with the lowest quality.

The narrator concludes by saying that cell phones are great for quick, casual shots that are going to be shared online, but a real camera will generally give better results.

I've said here many times, that I don't like using a phone as a camera because of the steadiness required while holding the phone away from my body. Holding it steady while taping the button is tricky. I don't always know if the picture has actually been taken. I have to keep my fingers away from the lens. Yes, these are all shortcomings on my part, but they don't apply to a real camera.

I suspect that some of you might disagree with this entire post. That's okay.
Yes, controversial, but I saw these reasons online... (show quote)


Also for me file size is larger on camera
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 102 next>>
Check out Software and Computer Support for Photographers section of our forum.
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.