Interested. Would offer 1250. Let me know.
Don Schmitz
MN Padre
wolfiebear wrote:
NIKON D750
I have actually never used LIVE VIEW for the simple reason that I can not see hardly anything in it, unless, perhaps, I am in deep shade.
I don't get it, guys. . . .
I don't have a D750 (a D7000) and am not a pro. But have a couple suggestions that have helped me with the LCD, viewfinder, tilt/swivel screen issues.
Forget the LCD for previewing, especially outdoors...I use it for reviewing images, if not in sunlight, for settings information (press info button) which is in black and white and easier to see in sunlight, and for viewing histograms which help with exposure more than seeing image.
As to TTL OVF vs EVF: I have an Oly OMD E-M 10 with an EVF. I like it for being able to have all the information I need in the eyepiece (including histogram) but my OVF on my D7000 is clearer.
My Oly also has a tilt screen which I enjoy using for low or high level shots. It helps me frame a shot.
Lastly, I also have a field guide I read and study frequently, and a quick reference guide (nine heavily laminated pages hooked to a carabiner) I always have with me.
And, of course, follow UHH daily!
Hope this helps.
MNPadre
Elliern wrote:
Have been looking at mirrorless cameras. I enjoy shooting BIFs, wildlife, flowers and some landscapes. At first was considering a Sony a6000. But others here said it was not the best for BIFs due to limited long lenses available.
After reading recent threads about the Olympus micro 4/3 cameras, I am wondering if the omd em10 would meet my needs. It looks good on paper and the reviews are good. There seem to be plenty of highly rated lenses that won't break my bank. What do you Olympus users
Thanks for any feedback and suggestions.
Have been looking at mirrorless cameras. I enjoy ... (
show quote)
I've owned the OM-D E-M 10 for about a year. Love it! My take-with kit. Although I have used DSLRs for years and still love my Nikon D 7000, my E-M 10 kit is better for hiking, travel and urban/around town/in doors photography.
Here's a $1000 kit: camera and 14-42 bundle: $700. 40-150 mm f4-5.6 R: $150. Small carry case/sling bag: $50. SD card: $50. CP filter: $50.
I'd also add a hand grip ($50) if you get the accessories for less than my estimates.
And, when you get a bonus or save for a while, the 75-300mm f4.8-6.7 II is terrific for wildlife.
Another $1000 bundle Olympus offers on its website is the E-M 10 ($600) with the 14-150 f/4-5.6 II lens ($400). The lens covers the focal length of the two lenses in the above kit, plus Olympus claims it's splash, dust and freeze proof! And camera and lens TOGETHER weigh @ 23 oz. About the same my D 7000 body only. I'm tinking about going that way.
(Note too, the smaller m4/3 system sensor results in a 2X crop factor, a doubling of the perceived fov as compared to a full frame sensor. [An APS-C sensor has a 1.5 crop factor.])
You won't be disappointed getting into m43 photography.
MNpadre
I think the shorter center post is for use with camera attached at bottom of post for low angle shots.
I agree with other posts about not extending center post to retain stability.
Who cleaned up the vack seat?
mdorn wrote:
I'm a little confused with this image... Can someone help me out? :-)
Maybe vests were like press passes, badges? And Nikon paid for advert?
Jay7h wrote:
In this months Outdoor Photography Magazine, there is an article about David Muench, who, they claim to be one of the greatest landscape photographers of all time. He lives in Montana and uses a small, lightweight digital camera for most of his work. He once used a 4 X 5 camera, but now uses two other cameras. Can you guess what cameras David uses?
According to the article, David uses either a Canon PowerShot SX50 HS or a Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70 for most of his work. Yes, a Canon PowerShot SX50! The pictures he posted in this magazine were all taken with these two cameras. He said the lightweight cameras allow him to move quickly and to handhold. He must be satisfied with the end results to use these cameras for most of his work. Of course he is a craftsman and gets the maximum effectiveness from them.
It is a great article and I recommend you buy the magazine if you would like to read more.
Also:
http://www.outdoorphotographer.com/locations/north-america/the-timeless-moment.html#.VPi89o47zuNIn this months Outdoor Photography Magazine, there... (
show quote)
A quote from the article tells me what the author intended:
"One of the greatest landscape photographers of all time, David Muench, travels through Montana with a variety of small, lightweight digital cameras. Muench proves that, in a craftman's hands, any tool can be used to maximum effectiveness. The craggy Rocky Mountains, swathes of flatlands and the notorious weather of Big Sky Country yielded some extraordinary images." (sidenote, page 79)
Jay7h wrote:
In this months Outdoor Photography Magazine, there is an article about David Muench, who, they claim to be one of the greatest landscape photographers of all time. He lives in Montana and uses a small, lightweight digital camera for most of his work. He once used a 4 X 5 camera, but now uses two other cameras. Can you guess what cameras David uses?
According to the article, David uses either a Canon PowerShot SX50 HS or a Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70 for most of his work. Yes, a Canon PowerShot SX50! The pictures he posted in this magazine were all taken with these two cameras. He said the lightweight cameras allow him to move quickly and to handhold. He must be satisfied with the end results to use these cameras for most of his work. Of course he is a craftsman and gets the maximum effectiveness from them.
It is a great article and I recommend you buy the magazine if you would like to read more.
Also:
http://www.outdoorphotographer.com/locations/north-america/the-timeless-moment.html#.VPi89o47zuNIn this months Outdoor Photography Magazine, there... (
show quote)
The article you note from the March issue of Outdoor Photography caught me eye as well. But, IMHO, it was more about Montana than about David Muench, hence, the title "The Big Sky." And it even has less to say about the cameras you mentioned that he uses.
David Muench is one of my favorite phtographers; landscape photography is my passion; and Montana one of my favorite places for scenery, vacationing, and photography.
Wesso wrote:
Would like your experts opinions on D7000 vs D7100 help me Hedge Hogs.
Not an expert, but have used D7000 since it came out. Great photos in any mode. Still learning. Much fun.
Screamin Scott wrote:
Anyone familiar with this outfit out of Minnesota ?... Getting a used ,older MF lens from them.. That I wasn't finding elsewhere. I give KEH a lot of business, but they, nor B&H, Nor Adorama, had this older macro lens...
Have purchased cameras, lenses, etc., both used and new, from Nat Cam for over 40 years. (They've been in business over a century.) Always courteous, knowledgeable, patient, enthusiastic and professional. Highly recommended.
For a trip have you thought about renting? Use the rental camera, with insurance, as your primary with your d7100 as backup. LensProtogo has d7100 four day rental @ $93. Add a 70-300 lens for $50.
Winterhawk1960 wrote:
I've been lurking, mostly in the background, for quite some time now. While lurking, I have learned an incredible amount from many different posters on many various threads. I currently own 3 older model digital camera's. A Sony F-707, I believe that has a Zeiss lens on it, also a Panasonic FZ-30 as well as a Panasonic FZ-100. That old Sony is hard to beat for sunrise and sunset pictures, the lens seems to prefer the warmer colors. Both of the Panasonic seem to prefer the cooler colors. My preference, overall has been the FZ-30, most likely because I have used it more and under various conditions.
I have been very interested in the Nikon D7 100 since it's release back in 2013. I've been reading all that I can find about it, as well as watching various videos on YouTube. I've really, REALLY been desiring the ability to take better pictures of my Grandchildren, both indoors as well as out. I also enjoy taking pictures of scenery and wildlife.
Fast forward to today, knowing that I had a "limited" budget to work with as well as the realization that quite a lot of what I photograph could be fairly well accomplished with an external flash unit and two or three carefully selected lenses. Today, I took the plunge and placed an order with Adorama. They just happened to have EVERYTHING that I was looking for in refurbished or used.......which really helped me stay within my budget and still get everything on my "want" list. Heck, I even saved enough to order a couple of books on the camera, as well. Listed below, are what I chose.....for now.
Nikon D7100
Nikon 35 mm f/1.8 AF DX
Nikon 50 mm f/1.4 Prime
Nikon 18-300 f/3.5-5.6 AF DX VRII
Nikon SB -100 Speed Flash
UV protective covers for each lens
Extra Nikon battery
2 - 32 GB high speed memory cards
I know this is a large step from the cameras I have been using and know that I have a lot to learn. I was born with an "addictive" personality and consider myself up to the challenge. I'm also ordering a couple of instructional books, "Mastering the Nikon D7100" by Darrell Young and "Nikon D7100" by David Busch. Hopefully that will increase my ability to use this equipment to it's full capabilities. I'm also very sure that I'll have a question or two, to ask here on the forum.
Let the FUN......and education begin !!!
Winterhawk1960
I've been lurking, mostly in the background, for q... (
show quote)
I have nearly the same gear with a D7000 body. Two suggestions: 1) have you considered a macro lens? I fell in love with the world macro opens you up to; 2) I have Dave Busch's guide, but also try the Whitecap Nikon Digital SLR Quick Reference Guide (nine laminated, two sided pages with everything you need to know at your fingertips. even comes with a carabiner-style clip).
Enjoy the grandkids.
mnpadre
wilsondl2 wrote:
It's my day to get on the soap box. If you do need a faster - longer - wider - etc ;ems you do not need to "upgrade" You will be hard pressed to tell the difference between the high priced f/2.8 lenses and your kit lens shooting ff/8 and not at the shortest or longest focal length. It's when you have special needs that you need to get the specialty lenses. If you shoot in low light you will need the faster lenses. If you do portraits you will need a lens with wide aperture so you can blur the background. If you want to do birds you will want a 500 or 600 mm lens. I hope you se the point. What i would recommend is that you keep a notebook and write down what lens you would need to take a shot that you want that your present lenses will not work. Then when you see a trend go for a lens that will do it. - Dave
PS: I think you must have GAS
It's my day to get on the soap box. If you do n... (
show quote)
Thanks, Dave. I like the notebook idea. Also that's a good habit for recording camera data, photo details, etc. I use a small digital voice recorder.
(I don't think I've got GAS, but, like they say, You can't smell your own.)
Thanks, again, for all the thoughtful and informative responses to my post. I will have to read over and over a couple, the link to Neil van Niekirk's article that CO posted, and amphoto1's comments.
amphoto asked about my lenses: here's the list...
Nikkors: 35mm AF-S DX f/1.8; 105mm Micro f/2.8 D; 18-140mm AF-S DX; 70-300mm AF-FX f/4.F ED
Sigma 150-500 DG
Tamron 10-24 SP Di II
Any suggestions for upgrades?
mnpadre