Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Toddicus
Aug 18, 2014 22:33:45   #
dandi wrote:
Composition is always very important. IQ, I think, is just one of many tools we use while creating the image. Sometimes excellent image quality does not benefit the picture. It depends what you want to tell in your image, extra sharpness may take your attention away from the content of the image.


Yes, I personally think the noise in this image adds a lot to it to give it more feeling. if it was all clean and perfect it would just look like another pretty modern lady without the same richness. looking at clean pictures of modern women dressed up in old style clothes just doesn't have the same appeal as a photo taken in the old days by a good photographer... at least thats my $.02
Go to
Aug 18, 2014 21:44:16   #
JohnSwanda wrote:
Having spent 30 years shooting film and developing and printing my own B&W, I feel I had an advantage going into digital over people who started out with it. Photoshop was designed to imitate the darkroom. And darkroom work is fun. I understand the rationale for having beginning students start out with it. It isn't a matter of how many people still do it - it's an excellent base to learn concepts in photography that carry over into digital.


Yes I agree, my darkroom days in college were invaluable. When you learn the root methodology for film you will be better equipped to take good digital pictures. I think of it like the old karate kid movie... "wax-on, wax-off"... it might seem mundane but it will greatly improve your overall ability with any camera. I for one am glad they still teach with film in those classes, and I'm even more glad that I took all those classes.
Go to
Aug 18, 2014 21:36:45   #
jethro779 wrote:
I have been learning my D7100 and decided tonight to see how good a picture came out of a Nikon 55-200mm f4-5.6 G ED lens and must say I was pleasantly surprised. I took the picture on a tripod and was 8 feet from the entertainment center. No flash and minimal pp done. I am impressed with the result.


Generally "kit" lenses are smaller aperture and wider zoom range. They tend to be good at most things but not great at everything. Of course you can get great pictures with them but depending on the circumstances you may have been able to get a better shot with a more specialized lens. It's always best to use the best glass you can afford for any given shooting situation.
Go to
Aug 18, 2014 21:31:23   #
SharpShooter wrote:
Bill, thus just my opinion, and mine alone.
No, the noise doesn't matter to me even one little bit.
That photo is SOOO compositionaly strong, the noise doesn't matter at all.
It didn't matter then, and it wouldn't matter if it was shot today with today's wonder cameras.
There are just TOO MANY that think IQ is King, and it's NOT.
COMPSITION is king.
Always has been, and always will be.
I know I'm in the minority here on this, but it's how I base my photography today! ;-)
SS
Bill, thus just my opinion, and mine alone. br N... (show quote)


I agree with this 100% well said.
Go to
Aug 18, 2014 01:42:42   #
Wandering wrote:
Not to be picky, but do you realize ALL CAPS is screaming?


Not to be picky but it's also against the forum rules to use all caps...
Go to
Aug 18, 2014 01:36:34   #
altheman wrote:
If you are into using a grey card check out Gary Fong's colour reference kit I saw it demonstrated in a B&H video recently and using it made sense. You can check it out here: http://www.garyfongestore.com/featured-products/color-reference-kit.html


May as well just buy his Lightsphere and use the white globe from that for WB... they grey top makes sense but costs dollars, I'm not sure the difference is really worth it. Perhaps with the set that has all three domes, but $20 for a grey balance is steep. will you really see the difference in your photo compared to a card? I saw his video too but I sell much cheaper alternatives and don't think the difference will be perceivable. Can anyone show a comparison set with the grey dome vs card vs nothing???
Go to
Aug 18, 2014 01:24:01   #
Eat lots of carrots to keep your eyes healthy. ;)

When going to the beach bring a rain cover. One of those $10 2 pack ones with the drawstring that goes over the lens will work wonders to keep sand out of your zoom on windy days. I saw a guy bring in a $2000 lens for repairs after taking it to the beach and a simple cover would have protected his investment without an expensive warranty. Since he didn't have a warranty it was going to cost him around $400 to get the sand out sending it in for repairs.
Go to
Aug 17, 2014 23:49:32   #
Hey Hedgehogs,

I finally registered for the forums and just wanted to introduce myself. My names Todd and I've been taking pictures as long as I can remember. I'm making some mid life changes and pursuing photography in a more full time manner, aspiring to become a self employed photographer someday in the not too distant future. For now I have changed career directions and found a full time job at my local camera shop and am job shadowing/assisting with local wedding photographers so that I may build my skills and portfolio.
Go to
Aug 17, 2014 23:20:22   #
HeyYou wrote:
Epson leads the pack. No question.
But for a budget of $150 don't buy a printer - the inks and paper alone will cost more than emailing your files to good ol' Costco - and your results will be far superior there, as well as less expensive than doing it yourself.
I have a $1000. Epson pro-quality printer - great results - but my Costco prrson does even better at less cost. She has a $10,000 machine - and inks and papers to match !
PS I'm in AA, not sure where Lambertville is - my Costco is just south of AA off of I94 at the State St exit, near our CrossFit gym.

(PS ill likely be selling my Epson - but that's not the point. And is my lesson learned.)
Epson leads the pack. No question. br But for a bu... (show quote)


This, so much this. Just get prints from your local camera shop or Costco or wherever does prints in your area. I used to buy printers and ink but the quality is just better from the shops with the 10-20,000 dollar printers
Go to
Aug 17, 2014 23:13:03   #
edmcdowell wrote:
Buy Nikon and always get a manual!


Also,

A wise man once said " Never underestimate a good photographer with a bad camera."

In other words: your Nikon won't make you or anyone else a better photographer.

An EVF just might though, since it helps to see the effects of setting changes in real time before taking the shot. It's a powerful tool for learning the differences in the settings. It's also a powerful tool for a good photographer with a good camera.
Go to
Aug 17, 2014 23:11:47   #
I read a post once that described the different brands as simply being three different flavors of awesome...
Go to
Aug 17, 2014 22:58:20   #
firtree wrote:
Best tip I have personally heard? "Don't quit your day job".


I took this a step further and got a day job at the local camera shop :-o :shock: :mrgreen:
Go to
Aug 17, 2014 22:53:08   #
I recently traveled to Vancouver out of SFO and had my rolling backpack/bag as my carry-on. At the airport I realized that my gear was too heavy for the 22lb limit for carry-on's and needed to remove my laptop (put in checked luggage) and my camera as well as a lens, which I put into my shoulder bag as my personal item. This brought my weight down to below the limit and I put the rolling bag in the overhead and kept my shoulder bag at my feet where I played with menus and settings during the flight.

It was a bit silly to need to separate my gear into a carry on and a personal item as it all fit nicely into the carry-on... but regulations are regulations. Luckily I had my shoulder bag in my checked luggage so I just took it out and rearranged things a bit.
Go to
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.