Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Peter1972m
Page: 1 2 next>>
Sep 7, 2017 02:15:52   #
shakeelcre wrote:
Sony A6500 crops sensor or A7R ii FF/crop as well. You are not going to be disappointed at all. Also you can use your Canon lenses on Sony with metabone adopter. Who knows Nikon may be out of business or Sony may end up partnering or buying Nikon camera division. Not to mention Sony A6500 and A7r ii are mirror less and very handy and easy compare to Nikon bulky body and heavy lenses.

Nikon continues to hold strong in the DSLR camera market with 39.1% market share (compared to Canon's 54.7% share). Nikon has benefited greatly by using well-regarded Sony sensors in its cameras.
Sony sensor technology is so great that company like Nikon who capture 39.1% of the DSLR market depends upon Sony sensors. I am not sure if Nikon heading towards bankruptcy but looking at the current decline in sales and loss of profits every year and limiting budget for R & D let's see how long they may sustain. I suggested Sony because if Nikon is depending on Sony sensor technology then why not just buy the Sony.
Nikon benefits from Sony's R&D by implementing their sensors in Nikon cameras. However, Nikon has done very little in terms of inventing new features on the cameras themselves. They have been slow to implement connectivity features as well as making any effort to reduce the size and weight of their gear. Sony is dumping billions of dollars into research and development of image sensors, which seems to be paying dividends. That also translates into camera sales, because they often prevent other companies from using their imaging sensors until Sony has used the sensor for 6 months in their own cameras. Your choice of camera is obviously a personal decision. But I hope that this background information can help you to make a more informed decision with your dollars.
Sony A6500 crops sensor or A7R ii FF/crop as well.... (show quote)


Nikon D850 has not got the Sony sensors and sales are doing well, there may be life in the old dog yet.
I've had to many problems with my Sony camera, battery life and power up lag are the two main areas I would like to see addressed, I've missed far to many shots because of them. I'm thinking about giving Canon try because of their superior L lenses, but so far I'm not impressed by the build quality of the body's, felt plasticity to me.
Go to
Sep 7, 2017 01:57:31   #
I went from the D7200 to the Sony A6000, I think your move is a great idea, I'm putting money aside for the move back. Battery life is killing me among other things.
Go to
Jan 24, 2016 07:00:36   #
Jim Bob wrote:
My opinion is it is insane to ask a bunch of strangers what to do with your money.


It's a hypothetical question, as it is nobody has sad anything camera wise that I've not gone over myself. I'm buying the Sony Alpha 7r hopefully.
Go to
Jan 19, 2016 17:38:49   #
jeep_daddy wrote:
I'd find a new hobby. It's obvious that you aren't 'into' photography any more. Perhaps you could spend your money on a drone, train set, ski boat, hell, I'm just throwing those options out there. It's your money. LOL

I was thinking about becoming a pole dancer lol
Go to
Jan 19, 2016 16:27:20   #
Lol I was just thinking that.😃
Go to
Jan 18, 2016 10:56:46   #
Three years ago I decided to purchase my first DSLR Camera it was a Nikon D3100 with the 18-55 kit lens. Within two months and with a lot of help from the Internet I had learnt how to use my camera in any of them modes it had to offer. Slowly bit by bit my kit grew in size, first a lens then a tripod, then another lens and a better more expensive tripod with matching ball head quick release mount, a sling back type bag for quick access, an sb600 flash slowly a second one followed then a flash trigger and 2 receivers. This was only about 8 months into my Journey. very dear friend of mine lent me his Nikon on D5100 for a couple of weeks while he was on holiday, it was great so much better than mine, it had a built in interval timer so I made a timelapse movie, the lowlight capabilities were outstanding compare it to mine too. even little things like the screen resolution on the back blew mine out of the water.
It was almost a year later I finally upgraded my body, it felt like forever before I could afford a new one, well what with buying myself a Lee Filters foundation kit and 7 different filters, and not forgeting another lens (macro this time) my kit was getting to big for my bag. Well the day had come, my new Nikon D7100 was here, but what's this, it doesn't fit in my bag, I needed a new one, I also treated my new body to a new lens, a 70-200 f2.8.
I finally solved my Nikon D3100, 2x lenses and first bag to my nephew.
In October last year I went to Florida for three weeks and took most of my camera equipment and a lens that I borrowed off a friend for wide-angle landscape photography, most days I found myself going out with just one lens and the body. My kit had become to heavy, and if I'm completely honest a real pain in the backside to the point where when I got home I put it all up for sale.
Well this was back in November, and last night, after I had completely forgotten all about it being up for sale, completely out of the blue I got a phone call saying they wanted to buy the whole lot for almost the price I had asked for. I got a say I did overprice it a little bit just in case I had sensible offer.
When I was in America with all my kit, going out daily with only one lens on my camera even that started to get my nerves, so on a couple of occasions all I took with me was my mobile phones camera.

So what to do now with all this money?
do I buy another DSLR and have it sit indoors while I'm out having fun with my phones camera, I absolutely love photography but do we need all this kit. Come on guys what's your opinion what would you do with my money if it was your money to spend?
Go to
Dec 6, 2015 16:23:27   #
I picked up a camera just under 3yrs ago, and jumped into manual mode from the off because I wanted to understand more. I find now if I let the camera decide it tends to opt for higher iso first imo, like in the days of old we would decide our ASA (iso) then go shot. The only time I really feel like I'm shooting in full manual mode is when I'm doing night photography and long exposures, this is the only time I have an edge on my uncle who only uses auto mode, also in low light his flash pops up and Imo kills his shots over mine, but on normal everyday occasions auto mode or a mobile phone camera can produce an amazing image, someone told me your not a real photographer unless you print and sell your images, he didn't say a thing about auto or manual, (he's an award winning wedding and portrait photographer who uses all modes and shoots in JPEG and sometimes RAW) everybody has a camera nowadays but only some are photographers.

Composition and understanding light is so much more important.
Don't be lazy with your interpretation.
Go to
Nov 1, 2014 07:52:52   #
I only ever use manual mode because I never want silly camera to decide what it is that I want to Do
Go to
Oct 8, 2014 17:02:17   #
MT Shooter wrote:
When the Muslim world rises up to battle ISIS along with the rest of the world, then I will believe their words a lot more.


I think I'm going to agree with this statement. There's far to many videos on YouTube saying that Muslims should join the fight against any non believers, well I'm not religious in any way and people like me are also their target, Muslims are not peaceful people even those that say they are are far from it, The Quran contains at least 109 verses that call Muslims to war with nonbelievers for the sake of Islamic rule. Some are quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads and fingers and k**l infidels wherever they may be hiding. Muslims who do not join the fight are called 'hypocrites' and warned that Allah will send them to Hell if they do not join the slaughter.
And ever dev**ed Muslim, extremist or not absolutly swears by the words written in it. Their long term mission is to out grow every other race and religion. Extremists just want it done in their lifetime. And they are winning because they have gained our trust. That's the bigger picture.
Go to
Sep 29, 2014 03:26:19   #
Mr PC wrote:
I need to be more careful. I have a white beard and a camera. I'll bet I fit some profile...


I hope your Santa making sure my new D810 is working perfectly.
Go to
Sep 26, 2014 12:17:58   #
skiman wrote:
I moved up from a D5100 to a D7100, soo glad I did. It depends on where you want to go with photography and what/how you shoot.


I've moved from a D3100 to a D7100, but I fill you would not really appreciate the kind of difference I'm noticing, as I did borrow a D5100 for a couple of months first, if I was in your pestion is would buy the best lens I could afford ie a F2.8 14-24, 24-70 or a 70-300 obviously the best range to suit your needs, Cannon has the best glass and Nikon has the best body if you make the huge jump to a D810 so it don't matter what make you go for, forget all I just said and get an iPhone 6 it will shoot round corners.
Only joking.
It's all about Glass, Glass,Glass. My D7100 (24.1Mpx) has only got a 3.5-5.6 70-300 on it, it's now the worlds most expensive 9Mpx camera.
I need a glass!
SOMEONE GET ME A GLASS!!!
Go to
Sep 20, 2014 13:32:57   #
Rongnongno wrote:
You have a whole lot to train her for.

1) The camera should be oriented differently. If the rectangle is horizontal, the camera should be used in portrait mode. If vertical the camera should be in landscape.
2) A mid range tele of at least 150mm is a must and the distance of at least four feet. I would not touch that with a less than a 150mm and likely would use a 200mm.
3) light must be difuse so that there is no sharp shadows
4) focusing must reflect the flat surface, meaning that it is not dead on center but slightly off
5) dof must cover all the extreme as a board is 3D object, not a flat one.

Why:
1) by using the reverse camera orientation you use only the center of the lens, avoiding some of the lens distortion
2) the longer the lens the less distortion
3) no explanation necessary
4) the focus plane is a spherical plane you use the 2D model since you want the maximal resolution at that level (to read the serial or part #)
5) no explanation necessary

Oh, if your tech does not follow your instructions? Fire her ass.

The 'normal' tendency is to fill the sensor from corner to corner. This is the worst mistake one can make.
You have a whole lot to train her for. br br 1) T... (show quote)


I'm gonna have to totally agree, as for camera and lens I coul have got the kind of picture you after with my old Nikon D3100 and Sigma 70-300 macro lens. Cheap as chips set up and I hated the lens but it will do the job fine.
Go to
Aug 27, 2014 16:08:28   #
Stef C wrote:
There are some Nikon Models, I think the 28-70, 70-200, and 300mm f/2.8 that came in white or greyish at one point.

What was the deal with that?

Also, i'm setting the over/under for Canon users making a joke about them wanting to be like Canon at 3.5..


Someone years ago told me that Nikon was first to do the white lens, years before Canon started making them. T/F I don't know.

I did read Nikon done it to keep their lense cooler when shooting in the sun, Canon only done it because they thought it looked cool. :thumbup:
Go to
Aug 11, 2014 18:15:54   #
I honestly can say.
Who really know what's what, because the news sauce looks a bit suspect you would say not.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/08/04/palestinian-authority-pays-millions-in-salaries-to-jailed-terrorists-with-help/

Hold on a minute,
goverments all over the world would lie to keep themselves in power.
Keep Your Friends Close And your Enemies Closer,
and who do you think are considered the biggest threat to any of the worlds goverments,
yes it's people they control.
Keep your eyes shut and your fingers in your ears,
We love it.
Go to
Mar 15, 2014 09:52:11   #
WilmarieG wrote:
I saw the Groupon deal for this course last night, offering it at £49 and I was very tempted. But being a severe skeptic, I did some research first and I would recommend not enrolling for this course.

On the website they state that they are IAO registered, but if you search that register number, it comes with a company called "Digital Sea Ltd" trading as "Careers for Travel" an accredited training provider in travelling careers, like cabin crews and things like that. It mentions nothing of Photography on this site and also doesn't list iPhotography as a sister company. A little bit dubious in my opinion.

Further to this, www.scamadviser.com has given them a trust rating of only 58% and states that the website has only been registered 157 days.

www.careersfortravel.com
I saw the Groupon deal for this course last night,... (show quote)


I paid £49 through Groupon to do the course, and questioned the accreditation too, as have others doing the course and this is the reply form one of the tutors.

You might be interested to know that there are no official accrediting bodies for online photography courses. If any online photography course claims to offer you a photography-specific “accreditation” then you would be wise to proceed with caution. However, you’ll be pleased to know that iPhotographyCourse.com along with its parent company, Digital Sea Ltd, has been awarded with exemplary accreditation by the International Accreditation Organisation based on the quality and standards of training we deliver.

As a student of iPhotographyCourse.com, this gives you the peace-of-mind assurance that our company, team and infrastructure have undergone rigorous quality assurance inspections and have met stringent guidelines, financial audits and background checks to ensure that our company and the photography training courses we provide meet the highest possible standards. It also enables us to provide our students with an I.A.O accredited “Certificate of Achievement” on successful completion of any of our courses. This is also one of the many reasons why we are the trusted photography training partner of schools, colleges and training institutions worldwide!

Digital Sea Ltd is the parent company of iPhotographyCourse.com and is a Registered Training Provider, member of ABCC and an internationally accredited training organisation.

after a little more research i found this all to be true, and after going through the course modules i am of the opinion that if you felt the need to bypass all the free information and tutorials found on the inter net it would be money well spent.

That said i personally would rather use video trainning from sites like:

http://www.karltaylor.co.uk/
http://icesociety.com/
http://kelbyone.com/
http://ph2pro.com/ Take a look at this one you want to get into head shots.
http://froknowsphoto.com/fro-video-guide-2/ Take a look at this one if your looking to go full manual.

also use YouTube and search photography tutorial.
Go to
Page: 1 2 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.