Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: mgemstone
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 13 next>>
May 31, 2013 11:54:01   #
Outsourcing and job shipped overseas - why should photography be any different than other jobs in this country. News is slanted by the politic viewpoints of the owners of the firm whether it be printed on paper or prodcast over some other media. The days of honest reporting are long gone. Jobs are eliminated, outsourced or turned into part time work to avoid paying benefits. It is just the way it is.
Go to
Feb 21, 2013 22:59:01   #
I'd recommend two lenses as possibilities in the under $600 price range. The Cannon 85mm F1.8 is an excellent portrait lens. Another choice is the Canon 70 - 200mm F4.0L at around $600. The latter is a super sharp lens that gives flexibility of focal length and is an excellent choice for outdoor portraits along with other uses. I have much more expensive lenses but I still use these as I like to have lenses mounted on different bodies so I don't need to change lenses which disrupts the flow of the shoot.
Go to
Feb 18, 2013 15:46:51   #
PhotoGator wrote:
Any DIY Idea to make a reflector?


Any thing white and small enough for a model to hold or to be placed on something such as 2'X2'. Cheapest solution is aluminum foil. You can also silver or light gold wrapping paper.
Go to
Feb 18, 2013 14:36:30   #
First, I would make your image as sharp as possible and not use any ointment applied a lens filter. It is much easier and safer to create a sharp image and blur it than take a blurred image and attempt to make it sharp. The nylon trick is old school but you can also get lens filter that is used for providing soft looks.
The real key is strong lighting close to the face, stretching the neck towards the camera to reduce neck wrinkles, and placing a reflector just under the face.
Of course, it is important to ascertain that the subject wants this type of look. Many older people are proud of their aged faces and want to wear their wrinkles proudly.
Go to
Feb 3, 2013 02:28:15   #
MtnMan wrote:
Swamp Gator wrote:
Capsurfer wrote:

Can you tell me why you say IS is not needed for BIF photos? Terrific photos by the way!


I always have IS turned off for action such as BIF. I feel it actually interferes with focusing on fast moving subjects.

I mostly only use IS for slow shutter speed stuff.


I leave it on but it may not help. I set shutter priority at 1/1000 for BIF. I read that above 1/500 IS/VR/OS does not help. I don't know if that is true or not.



A fast shutter speed freezes the movement of you subject (bird) and the IS/VR reduces the effect of the photographer not holding the camera steady.
Go to
Feb 1, 2013 13:56:16   #
I'm a Canon shooter and use the 300mm F4.0L IS and the 400mm F5.6L lenses for photographing birds in flight on my Canon 7D bodies.



Fergus wrote:
I'm falling in love with prime lenses but I wonder if they work for birding and BIF and other constantly changing views. It's too cold here now to get out and find out myself.
Go to
Jan 27, 2013 15:50:12   #
Two types of tripods are normally used for this type of shooting. You want both sturdy and a solution that reduces ground vibration. To accomplish both you need either wood or carbon fiber tripods. Expect to use a longer/heavier lens in the future so buy a tripod and head to accommodate it now. Gimbal heads are very popular. Wimberley and Jobu are the leading manufacturers. I use a Acratec GV2 Ball/Gimbal head. You really need to try these tools to find what's comfortable for you.
Go to
Jan 27, 2013 15:49:09   #
Two types of tripods are normally used for this type of shooting. You want both sturdy and a solution that reduces ground vibration. To accomplish both you need either wood or carbon fiber tripods. Expect to use a longer/heavier lens in the future so buy a tripod and head to accommodate it now. Gimbal heads are very popular. Wimberley and Jobu are the leading manufacturers. I use a Acratec GV2 Ball/Gimbal head. You really need to try these tools to fond what's comfortable for you.
Go to
Jan 17, 2013 23:36:00   #
IMHO, lens selection is a matter of the environment in which you are going to shoot, what you will be concentrating on such as people, buildings, etc, and your own style & personality. If shooting people and you are an extravert, then a shorter lens may be your choice especially if you are going to engage people while photographing them. If you are shooting scenes such a long city streets or want to photograph people at some distance, then a longer lens such as a zoom may be a better choice. If you want to shoot close to people without their knowledge, then a smaller camera rather than a DLSR maybe the choice. There is no one solution for everyone. Do some street photography before spending money on equipment. Experience is the best mentor. Shooting and watching other photographers capture images are the best ways to develop your style.
Go to
Jan 17, 2013 22:20:50   #
you are correct. A 50mm on film range finder camera is 50mm. To use the equivalent of 50mm on a APS-C sensor camera, that would be about a 32mm lens. (1.6 X 32mm = 50mm).


sbesaw wrote:
wlgoode wrote:
Pepper wrote:
I'd have to take both the 55-250 the 18-55.


Remember Henri Cartier-Bresson became possibly the most famous street photographer of all time by using only a 50mm on a 35mm film camera. 1.6 crop equivalent about 32mm.


I'm confused. Isn't a 50mm lens on a 35mm Leica Rangefinder camera a 50mm Lens? Doesn't a 1.6 crop factor refer to a Canon APS-C sensor? This is very confusing, please explain, thanks
Go to
Jan 17, 2013 17:24:34   #
First, I'd ask the group you joined for their recommendation. From the equipment you all ready have, I'd take the 18-55mm and leave the rest home. You may find that many of the photographers are using point & shoot cameras having at least 12mp. Being small, they are less obvious. The main initial goals are to learn and make new acquaintances. Also, if the group have images posted on the net from previous events, study them.

Takyo485 wrote:
Right now I am using t3i and I have 4
lenses to choose to an EFS 55-250mm
a EFS 18-55 mm. I don't think my 50 mm
1.8 is useful. I also have a fisheye lens.
I don't want bring all those lenses for it is too
heavy for me because our group will cover
a large area of the city.
Go to
Jan 17, 2013 17:24:34   #
First, I'd ask the group you joined for their recommendation. From the equipment you all ready have, I'd take the 18-55mm and leave the rest home. You may find that many of the photographers are using point & shoot cameras having at least 12mp. Being small, they are less obvious. The main initial goals are to learn and make new acquaintances. Also, if the group have images posted on the net from previous events, study them.

Takyo485 wrote:
Right now I am using t3i and I have 4
lenses to choose to an EFS 55-250mm
a EFS 18-55 mm. I don't think my 50 mm
1.8 is useful. I also have a fisheye lens.
I don't want bring all those lenses for it is too
heavy for me because our group will cover
a large area of the city.
Go to
Jan 11, 2013 14:40:15   #
I have a 7D and use a Tokina 11-16 F2.8. The faster lens is great for low light. I am pleased with the quality of the images produced with this lens.
Go to
Jan 11, 2013 14:25:22   #
[quote=Marinole][quote=Birdguide]
Marinole wrote:
Hi all, anyone have recommendations for a remote shutter release for my 7D. I have done a lot of reading and a lot of peole think the Canon product is good but grossly overpriced. I am willing to pay the price if it is the best thing out there. Last one I bought was a wireless cheapo that was totally worth what I paid for it ($6.00). Won't make that mistake again. I am doing bird photography and plan to start experimenting with star trails. Thanks.


I am eagerly awaiting responses to your question as I am in the same boat and was thinking about making a post like yours.


I've used both RPS and Hahnel units with good success with various Canon bodies. I have used these units at a distance of 50 feet and more without a problem. Generally, these have cost between $35 and $55.
Go to
Jan 10, 2013 15:51:36   #
CAM1017 wrote:
skidooman wrote:
KenL wrote:
I am excited to have just recieved my latest lens aquisition. It is the Canon EF100 f2.8L Macro IS USM. Can you tell me if the Macro Ring Light MT-24ex from canon is the compatible ring light and the best way to go.


I wish I knew then what I know now,,,I would've gotten that flash instead of the 14. I do think it's overpriced however. I like the idea of seperate flash heads though. A far less expensive option is the O-flash that Nikonian recommends.


I just attempted to mount my MR-14EX Macro Ring lite on to a new Canon 100mm 2.8 L IS macro lens and it is to small and will not fit. It does fit on a 50mm EF Canon Compact-Macro lens and work fine with it.
Do you need some type of step down adapter to use the 14EX Ring lite on the 100mm 2.8 L Canon Lens?
quote=skidooman quote=KenL I am excited to have ... (show quote)


Yes, you need the accessory made for the MR-EX lite. Go to BH and look at the attachments for this lite. You'll need the 58mm attachment if I remember the specs for the 100mm macro.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 13 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.