Gene51 wrote:
An FX 70-300 used at F5.6 at 300mm will not let in less light than a DX version of the same zoom. That is pure nonsense put out by Tony Northrup who has a tenuous relationship with the facts on this.
Where it makes sense to adjust aperture to compensate for crop factor, to a point, is when considering depth of field for the "same" composition. Clearly for the same composition with a 300mm on a full frame camera, you'd have to move back with a crop sensor camera and the same 300mm lens, increasing your depth of field. To get the same depth of field with the 300mm on the full frame camera you'd have to close the lens down a bit. But this has absolutely nothing to do with whether the lens is a DX or FX lens. I suggest you to to a store, put a DX 70-300 on your DX camera, then put an FX 70-300. You'll see that they will pretty much provide the same thing, provided the light transmission (T-Stop) is comparable.
Another validation is to look at any light meter. Does it have a scale or compensation for when you use an FX lens on a DX camera?
Follow your gut and question everything that just doesn't sound right.
Gene
Tony did show that when one uses the same lens on a crop and full frame camera, the crop camera image background is more in focus than the Full Frame camera image.
In the meantime, can you point me to the page where Nikon says aperture must be multiplied by crop factor?
An FX 70-300 used at F5.6 at 300mm will not let in... (
show quote)