Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: JJPhoto
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 9 next>>
Nov 16, 2016 06:28:11   #
Yes thankful
Thank you this informal as very helpful
Go to
Nov 16, 2016 03:31:19   #
Good day any suggestions on this topic?
Check this message out

My husband and I are interested in setting up and appointment with u to get holiday pictures done. We have 2 dogs that we would also like to include as well as my husband myself and our 14 month old daughter? What do u have available would have to be on a weekend as my husband works during the week? Also do we have to get prints printed out or can we just get the photos put on a flash drive and buy rights to print them anywhere? If so how much do u charge for this?
Go to
Apr 29, 2016 11:22:51   #
Someone told me that I would not be able to make a large print so I asked some real photographer
Thank you
Go to
Apr 29, 2016 11:20:33   #
Thank you
Go to
Apr 29, 2016 11:19:51   #
Great information thank you
Go to
Apr 29, 2016 07:12:10   #
How do I save edited images for large prints that are edited and shot in JPEG fine ?
Go to
Apr 26, 2016 13:32:55   #
Thanks good people I just make $100 for 12 images you post were very helpful
Go to
Apr 26, 2016 07:20:50   #
I'm live in a small town and the fee for the shoot had included 1-8x12 2-5x7s & 8 wallets prints $$75 now the clients wants to buy a few edited files that I put some time in to help make the presentation better I just don't know how to charge her

And thank you
Go to
Apr 26, 2016 02:24:57   #
What would you charge for the digital rights for your edited photos?
Go to
Jan 20, 2015 01:45:48   #
lighthouse wrote:
I really like this.
It is a beautiful image.
The concept is well thought out and reasonably well implemented. I like the smoothness in the processing as well.Or is that just the D4S?
I am interested as to whether the concept came first and then patient waiting over months for the right moment, or if you just happened to come across the light and took advantage of it.
To me it looks as if the building has either a little bit of "leaning back" or it is very slightly tilted to the right, either way, it may benefit from about 0.5 degree tilt to the left.
There is a mistake in the editing with the gaussian blur selection where the branches meet the left hand side roof. Those branches need to be sharp, or gone.

A very slight curve lift of the whites and shadows in the church would do wonders as well.
A very nice mono.
I really like this. br It is a beautiful image. br... (show quote)


This image was shot with the D4s and thank you for your editing tip I'm still trying to put this all together ..
Go to
Jan 20, 2015 01:41:22   #
minniev wrote:
Welcome and thanks for sharing a very nice image. I agree with most of the posters who pointed out some post processing artifacts that can be mitigated, but I did want to add that it is a pleasing and impactful image to view, reflecting the photographer's good eye for scene, drama and light. Processing is the easy part to fix but not everyone has that instinct that you obviously have for choosing what to photograph from what angle and what to make of the light available for use. BTW, I don't see any moire on the download, just the thumbnail which is no worry. I like your choice of processing, it just may need a bit of fiddling before its next contest!
Welcome and thanks for sharing a very nice image. ... (show quote)


Thank you
Go to
Jan 19, 2015 15:21:24   #
photoninja1 wrote:
On my screen, the download shows heavy moiré in the church. I'm not sure this can be completely dealt with in post, but it's worth a try. Brightening the church may help minimize the moiré too. I like the light and composition. The bald spot kind of matches mine, but mine is harder to fix! The shot has the makings of an outstanding image, and is well worth the work to make it so.


Thank you
Go to
Jan 19, 2015 00:22:02   #
Graham Smith wrote:
You can drop the "Sir", Her Majesty the Queen hasn't Knighted me... yet. Until that happens Graham will do just fine :-D


no disrespect Graham
Go to
Jan 18, 2015 14:56:26   #
Graham Smith wrote:
I like this but it does need a couple of things attending to, firstly the blown patch of sky needs judicious cloning in of clouds but still retaining some of the brightness in that area. Next, I think the church is a bit flat, lacking in contrast. Boost the contrast and make the white church really sing out and grab the eye. If you make the church the star of the show the other minor issues pointed out will pale into insignificance.

Graham


Yes sir
Go to
Jan 18, 2015 03:33:43   #
Nightski wrote:
Tack sharp shot with plenty of DOF. I like the angle, I love, love, love the light. It's great that the bright spot of light is right at the church's steeple. I would clone out the back stair railing and the sign. I wouldn't want to crop the image as I think a structure like this needs room. I like the little back building.


Thank you
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 9 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.