Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Ljensen
Page: 1 2 3 next>>
Aug 31, 2012 19:54:40   #
Fantastic shot!
Go to
May 27, 2012 13:23:49   #
Thanks for the tip. After Googling 'Comma or Question Mark Buttefly', I think it is probably a Question Mark Butterfly.
Go to
May 26, 2012 10:59:45   #
Does anyone know the name of this butterfly? I've not been able to identify it on the web.
Unfortunately my garden soaker hose is unavoidably in the background!
Location: Oklahoma City, flower is a butterfly bush blossom
Shot with my Nikon D7000, 18-105mm VR kit lens

Wings open


Side shot, proboscis curled


Side shot, proboscis in blossom

Go to
Jan 10, 2012 14:58:11   #
Looks like a very bright day. You could try a polarizing filter. Or go back during the golden hours.
Go to
Dec 29, 2011 13:30:14   #
Oh, and by the way, the field of view as well as the near focus distance would be limited on these lenses, especially the 70-300mm.

So for landscape shots, or something where you're within a few feet of, you'll want another lens in addition. I bought my D7000 with a kit lens, the 18-105mm. That would fill the bill. But a nice basic, prime lens is the Nikkor 50mm f1.8. You can get a used one on eBay for somewhere between $150-200. Also for low light situations, this would be a good lens due to the wider aperture.

But if you're just bringing one lens and you want to be able to do landscape and closer distance shots, it might sway you toward the 55-200mm. As to low light, you'd just have to rely on the D7000 being able to use higher ISO settings with good results.
Go to
Dec 29, 2011 09:34:51   #
fstop22 wrote:
Your D7000 will Love the fast focus of the 70-300mm. And if you ever get a full frame camera this lens will work also, but the 55-300 will not work on a full frame camera.
D0r1neK wrote:
So you have to have a full frame camera to use a full frame lens? So your saying I will not get the benefit of a full frame lens because my d7000 is not a full frame camera?


I also own the D7000 and 70-300mm VR. Love them both. The fast focus is definitely a plus. A side benefit is that I also dabble with SLR film cameras, so the 70-300mm works on those cameras as well. I have Nikon N80 and F4 SLR film cameras. Used SLR film cameras are pretty inexpensive on eBay; lenses are not.
Go to
Dec 25, 2011 15:27:51   #
Rich Maher wrote:
It's also postage free.


It's not actually free, just prepaid. $10 each roll for developing and scanning plus $4 for mailing. The $4 covers up to 2 rolls of film and is round trip.
Go to
Dec 25, 2011 14:40:57   #
Rich Maher wrote:
I use the darkroom.com. They develop B/W and color film. 120mm and 35mm.


I also use TheDarkRoom.com. I think they do a good job and the service is good. They put the scans of the negatives on a website and also return the negatives and a CD to me. Only thing is the web site is kind of slow.

I like that they allow me to prepay on the web, print a voucher, and drop it in the envelope with the film. That way I don't have to write my credit card number on the order form and mail it with the film.
Go to
Dec 25, 2011 10:37:54   #
Marvin wrote:
Is is better to shoot in black and White or shoot in color and make the changes using your software in photo shop.


Personally I would (and do) shoot B/W film. I've compared my own photos shot B/W vs shot digital color and converted via PSE using Scott Kelby's technique. I much prefer the results from B/W film. The hard part is finding a lab to develop B/W film.

But that's just my opinion, try it for yourself. If you don't have a film camera, they're cheap to pick up on eBay. And if you're shooting Nikon, your lenses are probably interchangeable, though a DX lens used on a FX camera will result in a cropped photo. Good enough to run the comparison though.
Go to
Dec 23, 2011 12:44:53   #
Thanks everyone for your replies. It really makes sense now. The thing that really started to clear things up was the mention of concepts such as 'back focal length', 'forward focal length', and 'subject size'. Again, thanks to all for your help.
Go to
Dec 23, 2011 12:41:56   #
CaptainC wrote:
DOF master asks you what camera you are using, so it is accounting for the sensor size. Just put in the REAL lens length.

Here is what is says on the site:
'Use the actual focal length of the lens for depth of field calculations. The calculator will automatically adjust for any "focal length multiplier" or "field of view crop" for the selected camera.'


For a given SUBJECT size and identical focal length, the FX camera will have a shorter DOF than a DX camera. This is because to make the subject size the same, the FX camera has to be closer to the subject.
DOF master asks you what camera you are using, so ... (show quote)


Ok, that's helpful. I'm beginning to understand now.
Go to
Dec 23, 2011 12:39:29   #
snowbear wrote:
It's a confusing subject.

The focal point is somewhere inside the lens, not on the sensor. There are elements in the lens, behind this point that get the image onto the sensor. I've heard of the last part referred to as "back focal length." This is what is different between the FX and DX lenses. The "forward focal length" is what is inscribed on the lens body (50mm, 90mm, 300mm, etc.)

To get a better idea, look at the camera/lens "cut=away" images here:
http://www.nikonusa.com/Learn-And-Explore/Nikon-Camera-Technology/g588ouey/1/The-DX-and-FX-Formats.html
It's a confusing subject. br br The focal point i... (show quote)


Ok, I begin to see. That makes sense.
Go to
Dec 23, 2011 11:43:48   #
snowbear wrote:
The focal length doesn't change just because you put it on another camera - it's a property of the lens, not the sensor/film size.

http://www.dofmaster.com/faq.html

The first field you enter into the (online) calculator is the camera you are using. That is what takes the sensor/film size into account.


That's where I'm having trouble understanding this. On a DX camera, a 300mm FX lens actually has a focal length of 450mm; while of course a 300mm DX lens remains 300mm. Since we're not telling DOFMaster whether the lens is DX or FX, are you saying that the DOF is the same for these 2 scenarios? How about the hyperfocal distance? It just seems like they've *got* to be different.
Go to
Dec 23, 2011 10:17:10   #
How do I use the DOFMaster depth of field calculator for a DX camera (Nikon D7000) with a FX lens (e.g., Nikon 70-300mm f/4.5 - 5.6G ED-IF AF-S VR)?

In particular, I'm wondering how to enter the focal length. For example, if I have the FX lens set at 300mm, do I enter 300mm in DOFMaster or 300 x 1.5 = 450mm? My guess would be the latter, but I'm not sure.
Go to
Dec 19, 2011 13:07:18   #
I recently used IrfanView to get a shutter count on my Nikon D50.

Steps:
1. Download and install IrfanView (free). Available at www.irfanview.com.
2. Download and install the IrfanView metadata Plugin. Also at www.irfanview.com.
3. Take a shot with the D50, get it onto my PC, and open it in IrfanView. The picture info option reports the photo EXIF data, which includes something called 'Picture Count'. I assume that's roughly equivalent to shutter actuation.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.