Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: FuzMuz
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 9 next>>
Oct 18, 2016 16:08:32   #
Go to You tube, submit search inquiry as follows "Back button focus for Nikon D3300. You should find several 'how to' videos
Go to
Sep 5, 2013 12:36:44   #
chapjohn wrote:
Does the A77 have the teleconvertor built in camera? My A500 has a button that will give 1.4x and 2x. It may change my mind about the A77 if it does not have this built in.


I donot believe so - Nothing in the owners manual or on camera menu.
Go to
Sep 5, 2013 12:32:09   #
Thanks for the feedback. Do you have any experience with Sigma's 50-500mm lens.
Go to
Sep 4, 2013 18:18:29   #
I have a Sony a77 with Sony 18-250mm. Looking for a compatible 2X converter, any suggestions?
Go to
Mar 17, 2012 15:26:18   #
Raptors, one USA made the other nature's

Rulers of the sky

Go to
Nov 24, 2011 13:50:24   #
abc1234 wrote:
Fuzman, thank you for that. I was unaware of it. I guess editing other's work is not for everyone. I am going to suggest to Admin that the person who posts the topic be able to indicate if he or she will allow downloading and editing.


abc123, I was not offended by your reedit, just wanted to make you aware of a new rule. I don't want to see/hear of anyone getting into trouble. I think best practice would be to send a private message before reediting
Go to
Nov 23, 2011 20:04:08   #
abc1234 wrote:
Another take on this. I prefer sunsets to sunrises.


CAUTION: Admin added this rule Nov 21, 2011
"I updated the Pictures section's rules, and added this clause:


Quote:
- Please do not edit and re-upload other people's pictures without their explicit permission. In other words, you may not open someone's topic, download an image, edit it (that includes adjusting settings, cropping, adding/removing visual elements, etc.), re-post it, and say "here is a version of your photo that I like better" unless they specifically ask for it.


This goes into effect immediately.
If you mess with other people's photos without them asking, you'll get banned."


Admin
Go to
Nov 22, 2011 06:52:25   #
Which is more appealing








Go to
Oct 23, 2011 23:55:53   #
wolfman wrote:
FuzMuz wrote:
gfox333 wrote:
HELP! Hello all. I am attempting to use a trial version of Elements 10. Upon inspection of some long exposure pics I took, I notice I have included the shadow from the tripod in my composition. I am new to post editing for the most part. Is there an easy fix? Greg


A general tip to one and all. Content Aware was added to PSE9, later versions do not have this feature.

Helpfull tip: You can adjust the size of the Healing Brush by tapping one the bracket keys to the right of the letter P on the keyboard. '[' will make the brush smaller and ']' will make it larger.
quote=gfox333 HELP! Hello all. I am attempting ... (show quote)


PSE10 has content-aware.
quote=FuzMuz quote=gfox333 HELP! Hello all. I ... (show quote)


Very true I should have stated 'older versions' not later versions, sorry for the confusion
Go to
Oct 23, 2011 22:45:01   #
gfox333 wrote:
HELP! Hello all. I am attempting to use a trial version of Elements 10. Upon inspection of some long exposure pics I took, I notice I have included the shadow from the tripod in my composition. I am new to post editing for the most part. Is there an easy fix? Greg


A general tip to one and all. Content Aware was added to PSE9, later versions do not have this feature.

Helpfull tip: You can adjust the size of the Healing Brush by tapping one the bracket keys to the right of the letter P on the keyboard. '[' will make the brush smaller and ']' will make it larger.
Go to
Oct 23, 2011 22:13:39   #
TangueroLS wrote:
Then I added a Levels Adjustment Layer and brought in the darks (13) and the lights (213) so that it has some snap without plugging up the shadows and blowing out the highlights, and minimized what I think of as an overall gray "cast" to the image.

Again, with a small JPEG, it's hard to correct some of the areas that need attention but if you use this as a jumping off point, I'm sure you'll end up with a photograph that you'll be much happier with. And you'll have refined your technique in the process. Meanwhile, the rest of us (including myself) can go take a flying leap off a rocky prominence.
Then I added a Levels Adjustment Layer and brought... (show quote)


Thank you for critiquing the photograph and not criticizing the photographer. I suspect Squirl's reaction was a result of my showing him how a simple one mouse click 'White Balance' adjustment could improve one of his photos. Why Steve came out of nowhere to criticize the photographer is unknown. Letting off steam about a process is one thing criicizing people for using it is quite a different matter.

Anyway thank you again for the helpful critique. Your extensive editing has removed the halo effect and I will try to use this process in the future.

To clear up a bad assumption - I did not use HDR in the original. It was a single photo edited in PSE9.
Go to
Oct 21, 2011 17:31:00   #
SQUIRL033 wrote:
FuzMuz wrote:
SQUIRL033 wrote:
actually, he did most of it by dodging and burning in the development stage, so the result appeared to have an expanded dynamic range. i'm not certain he would've been a fan of the current HDR fad. not a bad conversion, and you have some nice leading lines here, but there's too much exaggerated detail, which is typical of overdone HDR...


Fortunately for me my instructor disagrees with you


your instructor thinks Adams didn't do much dodging and burning to achieve his results? or he disagrees with my opinion on overdone HDR?
quote=FuzMuz quote=SQUIRL033 actually, he did mo... (show quote)


Squirl _ It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know digital didn't exist during Ansel's time. Dodge & burn was his way of achieving the HDR effect of today. I was given very high grade for the class and that's all that is important
Go to
Oct 21, 2011 16:54:59   #
SQUIRL033 wrote:
actually, he did most of it by dodging and burning in the development stage, so the result appeared to have an expanded dynamic range. i'm not certain he would've been a fan of the current HDR fad. not a bad conversion, and you have some nice leading lines here, but there's too much exaggerated detail, which is typical of overdone HDR...


Fortunately for me my instructor disagrees with you
Go to
Oct 21, 2011 14:06:59   #
Ansle via his zone map technique actually developed High Dynamic Range photography for film. Here is a digital facsimile.

fence line

Go to
Oct 20, 2011 21:40:53   #
SQUIRL033 wrote:
half an hour after sunset on the Cle Elum River in the Washington Cascades... 5D, 24-135 @ 64mm, 3 sec @ f/14


Nicely done - good color balance
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 9 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.