Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: DakotAZ
Page: 1 2 next>>
Sep 27, 2012 02:16:43   #
Best Buy sells a "LENSPEN" for $10 and some change, and Walmart sells them for between $7 and $8 when you can find them in stock. Compact, convenient and works great!
Go to
Sep 25, 2012 17:52:11   #
That was great & very touching! Thank you. A nice break from a lot of the drivel on here lately.
Go to
Sep 20, 2012 03:03:38   #
PrairieSeasons wrote:
RixPix wrote:
PrairieSeasons wrote:
I'd find the arguments in that article more compelling if they were written by someone a bit less one sided than David Brooks.

Nevertheless, Romney's comments are basically correct and the situation in which we find ourselves was quite predictable.

Alexis de Tocqueville warned us 150 years ago that this time would likely come (that is, a time where a significant portion of the population could get more money from the state by voting for the right guy). He also warned that if and when that happened, it would be the end of our "experiment" in democracy and the beginning of a strangulating tyranny.

Romney is right to remind us of that, and while both candidates for president are flawed, he is by far the more honest in this regard and deserves our vote.
I'd find the arguments in that article more compel... (show quote)


You do realize of course that Mr. Romney was unaware he was being taped and that according to Mr. Leder the host of the party all of the guests were asked not to repeat anything that was discussed with any person outside the room. Now, if Mr. Romney were this beacon of truth why do suppose the guests had to agree to the gag order. That short speech is the first time the real Romney agenda was heard by more than a few close big money contributors. This is the real Romney he represents the very type of person this country was founded to avoid...demi-royalty. He gives what he wants to the people regardless of need, he will take all that he can from the majority of the people until they can give no more. He is an aristocrat and regardless how much money you earn unless you are in with his group his election is going to cost you. Maybe not in taxes but certainly in revenue. The more you bleed the majority of the population through health care, costs, interest costs, housing costs, and taxes the less the have to spend. We have been experiencing this right now. You think that electing someone with a plan that is the antithesis of the majority of expert opinions will be helpful? You must be daft. Even Romney doesn't believe it will work. He's just trying to get a new job so his wife can play First Lady and to avenge his father. He most likely will be a moderate President and turn on the right the same way the Chief Justice did. I also believe that if by some odd chance he does become President he most likely will either be a one-term President or die in office so his second can carry the neo-con plan to fruition.
quote=PrairieSeasons I'd find the arguments in th... (show quote)


Neither one of them is a very good candidate for president. Regardless, the incumbent appears to think that we can go on spending money we don't have with no consequences while R&R have a plan to stop that and reverse it.

Your rationale that the gag order in any way disqualifies Romney is a joke. You don't think that the Democrats do the same thing?

I thought it was particularly telling of the Democrats that you had to have a photo ID to even get near the convention, but that somehow you don't need one to vote.
quote=RixPix quote=PrairieSeasons I'd find the a... (show quote)




:-D :thumbup:
Go to
Sep 16, 2012 17:46:24   #
Denisedancer wrote:
Gosh, I'm really sorry if anyone is offended. Its quite a common saying and certainly not considered offensive. I'm certainly not the sort of person to be rude or insulting to anyone at any time. Interesting if it has a British origin. I lived in London for 3 years in the "70's" and came home and met and married an Englishman. I guess that explains how I picked it up. This is an International blog Krispix perhaps you should make some allowances for the quirks in other peoples expressions.
Gosh, I'm really sorry if anyone is offended. Its ... (show quote)


Please!!! YOU (Denise) are not the one being rude here.
Go to
Sep 16, 2012 17:31:08   #
Fun! Great shot of the racing car!
Go to
Sep 16, 2012 17:10:43   #
tramsey wrote:
They do not look healthy. I can see ribs on #1. Being wild must not be what it's cracked up to be.

Good shots, patience wins


#1 actually looks like it might be an older horse and that sometimes happens. My daughter has horses and she can't fill in the ribs of her old Arabian for love nor money. She feeds him good quality hay, grazes him and gives him daily sweet feed (everything the vets suggest). Her other horses are fat and sassy, and he got that way in only the last year or two. That's just the way it is sometimes. Thought the other two looked pretty good.
The other possibility is that it could be a horse somebody turned out into the wild because they could no longer afford to feed it. We have had a lot of cases of abuse (neglect) in the Phoenix area lately due to the high cost of feed and the poor economy in general.
Especially like the third shot, and he looks young, strong and healthy.
Go to
Sep 14, 2012 00:04:44   #
[quote=Festina Lente]
redfordl wrote:
I am looking to upgrade to dslr and am considering the nikon d5100 vs. the canon 3ti.(budget range) What would be your choice and why?


OK, but this may be more than you want to know, but this is not an easy decision when analyzed,
but it is a no brainer decision otherwise.
EITHER CAMERA IS A GREAT CHOICE!!...........

Nice! A well articulated and objective rendition of the facts. So much more pleasant and informative than some of the biased rantings and sarcasm we occasionally see on here. Now if we could only accomplish the same with our political discussions.
Go to
Sep 13, 2012 01:11:09   #
Sarge, did you use filters when you took these pix, and if so which one(s) for which pictures? Thanks!...Dakota

sarge69 wrote:
I just got a SX40HS and it is great. I'll attach a couple photos for your examination

Sarge69
Go to
Sep 12, 2012 16:01:27   #
[quote=Teacher]MC What I'm talking about is having to rotate the filter with the lens hood in place. My fingers can barely squeeze in there. In winter with gloves, it impossible. You also need to be sure you aren't unscrewing the filter and for this feeling is the key.
mcveed wrote:
Teacher wrote:
Almost forgot but this might be important if you're trying to pack all the necessary photo. equipment for the trip. You can leave your lens hoods at home if you are using a circular polarizer. They will only get in the way and take up a lot of room in your pack.

Nonsense! Sunlight falling directly on a polarizing filter will have the same dulling effect as if it fell directly on your lens or any other filter. Lens hoods are intended to keep sunlight from striking the front element of you lens or filter. You can test the effect without even taking a picture. Remove your lens hood and aim your camera at about 90 degrees to the sun when it is low in the sky so that the front of the filter is in the sun, look through the viewfinder, now hold your hand up so the filter is shaded. If you don't see a significant difference I'll be surprised.
Almost forgot but this might be important if you'r... (show quote)
quote=Teacher Almost forgot but this might be imp... (show quote)
Go to
Sep 11, 2012 13:42:29   #
[quote=architect]
DakotAZ wrote:
krispix wrote:
I would suggest a Circular Polarising Filter (DO NOT GET A LINEAR) is the first filter anyone should buy, and do not skimp on price. They are costly, but the cheap ones are evident..........

How do you know you aren't getting a "cheap one"...especially when buying on line? I know that for a lot of things, price is not necessarily an indicator of quality.


B+W, Hoya, and others with multi-coated glass are what you want. Do not get an uncoated filter, as it can degrade your images. I have the Hoya HMC filter and it is excellent.
quote=krispix I would suggest a Circular Polarisi... (show quote)


Thanks, Architect!
Go to
Sep 11, 2012 12:32:10   #
krispix wrote:
I would suggest a Circular Polarising Filter (DO NOT GET A LINEAR) is the first filter anyone should buy, and do not skimp on price. They are costly, but the cheap ones are evident.
They do two jobs and you have to rotate them on the lens for best effect. They reduce (or almost eliminate) reflections on glass, water etc. and they will make the sky a darker blue so your white fluffy clouds stand out more.
The effectiveness is all about angles. For the sky, the best results will be when the sun is at 90 degrees to the shot. To reduce reflections is a bit more complicated and is best done by trial & error.

Just a tip. Do not wear polarising sunglasses when using this filter unless you like staring at a black viewfinder!
I would suggest a Circular Polarising Filter (DO N... (show quote)



How do you know you aren't getting a "cheap one"...especially when buying on line? I know that for a lot of things, price is not necessarily an indicator of quality.
Go to
Sep 4, 2012 05:16:53   #
barbuck99 wrote:
DakotAZ wrote:
Can someone address using a hood and/or UV filter on this camera. Can you use both and how does that work... adapters needed etc? Not sure what I need to get. I already have 2 UV filters (58mm & 62mm) I use with my Rebel lenses. Can I use either of these? Am also confused about adapter sizes. They are always listed as one size. Is that the size of the camera side or the lens/filter side? Hope this makes sense.

Having owned various series of Canon bridge cameras, I have always purchased adapters from Lensmate. They are better made than many competitors and less expensive than the Canon-sold models.
When I purchased my SX40 last year, I had hoped I would be able to use adapters from my S5, but the SX series uses a completely method of attaching filters, etc.
I ended up with a 58mm adapter, several filters (polarizing, graduated ND), lens cap, and collapsible lens hood. No problems with vignetting or otherwise. So, Dakota, if you went this route, you could use your 58mm filters.
They are at http://www.lensmateonline.com/store/.
quote=DakotAZ Can someone address using a hood an... (show quote)


More to consider. Thanks, barbuck. Is your collapsible lens hood a snap-on?
Go to
Sep 4, 2012 05:12:07   #
WxGuesser wrote:
I get a minor bit of vignetting at full wide angle when taking photos but when taking video at widest angle, watch out! You can actually see the filter ring!

Wahawk wrote:

Many of the smaller sizes, depending on the adapter, etc, can lead to vignetting towards the wide-angle end of the zoom. I have heard that some use the basic adapter which is for 67mm and then put step-down rings on it to fit the smaller filters. This means that the filter is getting farther away from the front of the lens, and the farther away it gets, the greater the chance of those pesky dark corners that you don't want, unless you stay zoomed out a ways.
I get a minor bit of vignetting at full wide angle... (show quote)


Ooooh! Good to know about the video, Guesser. Still sounding like using the standard 67mm will be my best bet for any filters I might add...and keeping those at a minimum. My apologies to anyone I may not have responded to but I have read ALL the posts and the input is much appreciated. Good Stuff!
Go to
Sep 4, 2012 04:58:22   #
Jackinthebox wrote:
haroldross wrote:
I use the Canon LH-DC60 Lens Hood for the SX40 HS almost all the the time. I have the 67mm adapter so I can use a CP filter or ND filter. I don't use a UV filter on it since I use the lens hood as a protector.


I also se the Canon LH-DC60 hood. fits very well. The supplied lens cap goes on easy, one finger operation.

I will try to stay away from using amy thing else like filters on the front as it ads weight to the lens drive. Just my feeling< I like to hear your reasoning.
Have not used it as much as I like but it looks like it will become the 90% use time camera.
I will still look for some smaller cameras with GPS and such.
quote=haroldross I use the Canon LH-DC60 Lens Hoo... (show quote)


Until now didn't have enough knowledge to even reason this one out. Had always heard about the wisdom of using a UV filter to protect the camera lens but am now thinking I will probably opt for the hood instead. That way I can still use a CP filter or others if needed. Thanks Jackinthebox.
Go to
Sep 3, 2012 19:44:46   #
haroldross wrote:
I use the Canon LH-DC60 Lens Hood for the SX40 HS almost all the the time. I have the 67mm adapter so I can use a CP filter or ND filter. I don't use a UV filter on it since I use the lens hood as a protector.


So I don't need both...a hood AND a UV filter. What are the pros and cons of one over the other or is it just personal preference?
Go to
Page: 1 2 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.