Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: JessieNoelPhotography
Page: 1 2 next>>
Jun 20, 2012 02:16:24   #
While I was with my sister, I caught a few pictures of this bird that I'd like to share with y'all








Go to
Jun 17, 2012 19:53:31   #
Ya, it's quite amazing. I really like it. And I got it for an extremely low price. Actually 375, for about 1600 dollars worth of equipment :)

dhelix33 wrote:
Jessie -

I was just wondering if the captures you posted were post-processed, and if so what software you used. From your response, it appears that you have not used post-processing digital imaging software tools on your captures.

One of the reasons I started this thread was not just to share pictures, but also to share experiences and knowledge.

Although I exclusively use Nikon equipment, I am not a Canon 'hater' - in fact the Canon EOS Rebel Xsi you own is a quite good entry level DSLR...

Greg

JessieNoelPhotography wrote:
Those are really great :) So was there a particular reason you asked what I used? Just wondering. :)

dhelix33 wrote:
For instance, in the link below you can see a set of images I went out into a cloudy Eastern Nebraska countryside yesterday morning and captured. Processed all the images with Adobe Lightroom and Photomatix. However one image was processed with natural tonemapping the other with effect tonemapping.

I did this to specifically show the glaring difference in tonemapping an image to enhance the natural definition of resolution as opposed to the - at times - garish over processed effects with 'tricked-out' enhancements I have seen people present online. Personally the more natural processing method is my preference - this link was just a simple method to display the general difference between the two. There are some who spend quite a bit of time with HDR processing, and create quite spectacular results (a colleague, Neil Armstrong based in Los Angeles is one).

After opening and cataloging the images in Adobe Lightroom, I do an initial processing effort with Adobe Lightroom exposure modification tools. I then used the Tonemapping "Enhancer" tools in Photomatix 4 software for the natural processed images, and the "Painterly" or "Grunge" tools in Photomatix 4 software for the over processed look.

Shot with my: Nikon D700 FX, Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8, Sigma 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye, Sigma 14-24mm f/4.5-5.6

Cheers!

Greg

http://www.flickr.com/photos/73877479@N00/sets/72157630148923376/show/

JessieNoelPhotography wrote:
dhelix33 wrote:
Hi Jessie -

what equipment do you use? Also, was any post-processing performed on the images you have put up here?

Greg

JessieNoelPhotography wrote:
:) here is two


I just use a normal Canon EOS Rebel Xsi with a 75-300mm lens. And what exactly do you mean about "post-processing"?
For instance, in the link below you can see a set ... (show quote)
Those are really great :) So was there a particula... (show quote)
Jessie - br br I was just wondering if the captur... (show quote)
Go to
Jun 17, 2012 10:38:34   #
Those are really great :) So was there a particular reason you asked what I used? Just wondering. :)

dhelix33 wrote:
For instance, in the link below you can see a set of images I went out into a cloudy Eastern Nebraska countryside yesterday morning and captured. Processed all the images with Adobe Lightroom and Photomatix. However one image was processed with natural tonemapping the other with effect tonemapping.

I did this to specifically show the glaring difference in tonemapping an image to enhance the natural definition of resolution as opposed to the - at times - garish over processed effects with 'tricked-out' enhancements I have seen people present online. Personally the more natural processing method is my preference - this link was just a simple method to display the general difference between the two. There are some who spend quite a bit of time with HDR processing, and create quite spectacular results (a colleague, Neil Armstrong based in Los Angeles is one).

After opening and cataloging the images in Adobe Lightroom, I do an initial processing effort with Adobe Lightroom exposure modification tools. I then used the Tonemapping "Enhancer" tools in Photomatix 4 software for the natural processed images, and the "Painterly" or "Grunge" tools in Photomatix 4 software for the over processed look.

Shot with my: Nikon D700 FX, Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8, Sigma 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye, Sigma 14-24mm f/4.5-5.6

Cheers!

Greg

http://www.flickr.com/photos/73877479@N00/sets/72157630148923376/show/

JessieNoelPhotography wrote:
dhelix33 wrote:
Hi Jessie -

what equipment do you use? Also, was any post-processing performed on the images you have put up here?

Greg

JessieNoelPhotography wrote:
:) here is two


I just use a normal Canon EOS Rebel Xsi with a 75-300mm lens. And what exactly do you mean about "post-processing"?
For instance, in the link below you can see a set ... (show quote)
Go to
Jun 17, 2012 10:28:50   #
dhelix33 wrote:
In terms of digital imaging software - such as Adobe Photoshop or Adobe Lightroom...

JessieNoelPhotography wrote:
dhelix33 wrote:
Hi Jessie -

what equipment do you use? Also, was any post-processing performed on the images you have put up here?

Greg

JessieNoelPhotography wrote:
:) here is two


I just use a normal Canon EOS Rebel Xsi with a 75-300mm lens. And what exactly do you mean about "post-processing"?


I have Adobe Photoshop Elements 8
Go to
Jun 17, 2012 10:19:03   #
dhelix33 wrote:
Hi Jessie -

what equipment do you use? Also, was any post-processing performed on the images you have put up here?

Greg

JessieNoelPhotography wrote:
:) here is two


I just use a normal Canon EOS Rebel Xsi with a 75-300mm lens. And what exactly do you mean about "post-processing"?
Go to
Jun 17, 2012 00:09:09   #
:) here is two




Go to
Jun 15, 2012 03:02:45   #
Here's my two :)

The bee that caught my eye, more then the stand still baseball game




A really pretty moth at my house

Go to
Jun 14, 2012 03:20:00   #
Bugs that just caught my interest, and I decided to play with my Photoshop and edit a little bit. Tell me what you think?












Go to
Jun 12, 2012 01:09:42   #
Part of a photo shoot I did for my friend and her boyfriend.






Go to
Jun 12, 2012 01:05:58   #
mdorn wrote:
JessieNoelPhotography wrote:
Ok, now I'm not very happy. I enjoy all the criticism, but if your gonna tell me I'm wrong on what picture I took, then stop commenting. If the base looks different then your's, it's probably because we are poor and use what we have. But I can very well assure you that, that is IN FACT third base, I was sitting right behind it. I don't know why you people keep on insisting I am wrong. And if you continue to do so, I am going to have to ask you to stop commenting


I'm NOT challenging this. I'm just curious how someone else can with so much resolve. I thought perhaps I missed something in the photo (i.e. the bag). Didn't mean to start something. My apologies.
quote=JessieNoelPhotography Ok, now I'm not very ... (show quote)


It was not you, it is the people that insist I am wrong.
Go to
Jun 11, 2012 20:37:09   #
thank you for agreeing :)
Go to
Jun 11, 2012 20:36:38   #
Ok, now I'm not very happy. I enjoy all the criticism, but if your gonna tell me I'm wrong on what picture I took, then stop commenting. If the base looks different then your's, it's probably because we are poor and use what we have. But I can very well assure you that, that is IN FACT third base, I was sitting right behind it. I don't know why you people keep on insisting I am wrong. And if you continue to do so, I am going to have to ask you to stop commenting
Go to
Jun 11, 2012 00:56:42   #
I was in the outfield and that may be what is throwing you guys off.. but yes, it is third base. on our field, if it was first base, the white line would be painted on the opposite side
Go to
Jun 10, 2012 22:37:05   #
Thanks for the constructive criticism, it does help. :) And to the person who tried to tell me that wasn't third base, you are wrong. I took that picture, sitting right next to third. I know what I was taking a picture of.
Go to
Jun 10, 2012 20:11:58   #
Thank you, and for the last one I was standing behind the dugout
Go to
Page: 1 2 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.