Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: subroto mukerji
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 196 next>>
Jul 28, 2013 09:12:28   #
Glad you liked them -- thanks for the kind words, Poladot.
Go to
Apr 15, 2013 12:17:02   #
Michael Digital wrote:
I have 4 Canon "L" lenses, but I never hesitate when I want a walk around lens. I just grab my 18/135 IS Canon kits lens. Its up to the job and the images are excellent.

As Michael Reichmann said, " Most lenses are better than most photographers."


Excellent quote, Michael Digital...and results to match ! :thumbup:

Here are a couple of pics shot with 2 different compact cameras...can't lug a dslr everywhere with me, can I ?

Household pet


Street shot

Go to
Apr 15, 2013 10:26:09   #
[quote=amyinsparta][quote=Bobgood1]While Glass lenses have been the norm since time began, I have wondered WHY some photogs. put down plastic optics ? The have been a " God-send," in weight saving for eye glasses. They save a lot of weight in camera handling. I wonder if it isn't just a " Purist," thing to say Glass is better or the security of the added weight. ( As in stronger ) Any thoughts ?[/quote

I have what I can afford. I don't even think of how much better my shots could be if I had a 2 grand lens, or even an $800 lens because I simply don't want to spend that much money on photography. So I stick with my kit lenses, learn as much as I can and do the best I can. I do have a Canon 50mm macro lens that I can see is sharper than the kit lens. However, it isn't a IS lens and so really I can't do as much with it as I thought I could.I'm not young and steady anymore. Tripods and monopods don't help when I have to lay on the ground, shoot straight up, or part leaves to get at the bug, or any number of other situations in which a pod of any kind is useless. So I take the best picture I can, crop and fix, and I'm happy. I don't plan on selling any, and my family and friends think I'm a professional!! works for me! :mrgreen:[/quote]

Amy, I am least concerned with the kit you use. All I know is that WHEN IT COMES TO COMPOSITION, EXPOSURE, AND ARTISTIC MERIT, YOUR PHOTOGRAPHS HAVE BEEN CONSISTENTLY OF THE HIGHEST QUALITY. They run rings around photos taken with far costlier gear. You are an extremely artistic and talented person, and it shows in your photos. No amount of $$$ can buy imagination and artistic instinct !! :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Go to
Apr 15, 2013 09:58:50   #
Pedrohog wrote:
Wonderful response, albeit mildly depressing since, natch, I want the best, sharpest image possible. But thanks so much!


Do not despair, Pedrohog. Some of my best photos have been shot with the 18-55 and 18-105 kit lenses. These lenses are rated very highly by the cognoscenti. I have seen photographs shot with the humble 18-55 mm lens and the 55-200mm kit zoom that surpass any images I've seen shot with far costlier lenses. Kit lenses are superb for what they are meant to do: take pictures. They have limitations, true; go find workarounds for them.
Do not allow yourself to be demoralised by those who console themselves that since they have bought costly gear, they must be taking great pictures. Nothing could be further from the truth. Moreover, post-processing plays a major role when it comes to the digital image. Darkroom skills have always been of crucial importance, even in the days of film.
Costly gear is tougher and has more features, but it does not come with a built-in guarantee as regards picture quality. THAT will depend on your skill and creativity.
So just pick up whatever gear you have and go out and take photographs with artistic merit, unfazed by mere technical nitpicking. If cost of equipment = picture quality, it would be best for all those with lesser gear than Leica or Canon 1DX to just stay home. Yet, that is patently untrue. Lens snobbery is not going to get anyone good pictures; only skill and brains will do that. Get to know your gear, its limitations and strengths, and use that knowledge to create images to be proud of.
Go to
Apr 8, 2013 13:24:24   #
angler wrote:
Charlotte and Melissa,our two grandaughters trying to hide from me in the long grass.


Wonderful shot, angler ! Captures the essence of childhood, when make believe IS real !! :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Go to
Apr 8, 2013 09:24:35   #
ottimista wrote:
Hi All, Today's bird is the Rainbow Bee-eater. 23-27 cm (10").
They eat bees & dragonflys which they capture in flight then fly back to a perch and beat the insects against the wood. Notice the difference tail feathers and chin colors of the different sexes. One of my favorite birds. Taken this morning with the SX50HS, full zoom, hand held and cropped.
David


Very nice set, ottimista ! Come to think of it, I haven't seen one in ages, what to speak of photographing one :-(
Go to
Apr 3, 2013 00:22:23   #
markar wrote:
Beautiful and smart. Great combination. :-)


Thank you, Marilyn -- you are always so kind :D
Go to
Apr 1, 2013 10:04:14   #
tlbuljac wrote:
lovely dog


Ahem...with a lovely girl ! The D5100 did the photographer right proud, too !! :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Go to
Apr 1, 2013 09:51:46   #
GWR100 wrote:
This is one of the most photographed scenes in England. It is the Seven Sisters Chalk Cliffs with the old Coast Guard Cottages in the foreground. Film buffs may recognize the beach on the left of the photo, It is were Kevin Costner filmed the landing in England in the film Robin Hood Prince of Thieves.


Wonderful photograph, GWR100 :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Go to
Apr 1, 2013 09:36:26   #
romanticf16 wrote:
For Nikon I'd say it was the 105 f2.5. Great for portraiture and across the room photojournalism with Tri-X pushed with Acufine Developer.-I'm speaking in the '60's and 70's.


Page 2: Ditto, romanticf16. Along with the 80~200 mm f. 4.5 zoom-Nikkor and the 55 mm f. 3.5 micro-Nikkor, the 105 mm f. 2.5 tele-Nikkor was one of the greatest lenses ever made for 35 mm photography. Thirty years ago, I made some of my most treasured pictures with this trio of legendary Nikkors.
Go to
Apr 1, 2013 09:20:38   #
jerryc41 wrote:


Good article, makes perfect sense. Thank you for this, Jerry !
Go to
Mar 30, 2013 12:56:54   #
Joyfullee wrote:
Nice work, especially like #3, her smile comes through her eyes! Beautiful! :thumbup:


Very grateful for your kind comments, Joyfullee :D
Go to
Mar 30, 2013 04:59:13   #
vicksart wrote:
Everything you photograph seems to turn out really well. Part of your success lies with having great subjects. That said, this was sure to be outstanding. Thanks for sharing this beautiful series.


Wow thanks, vicksart -- very kind of you to look / comment. I am happy to share with cognoscenti like yourself and others on UHH :D
Go to
Mar 30, 2013 04:57:04   #
Horseart wrote:
Beautiful photos of a beautiful girl!


Thank you, Horseart :D Love your work :thumbup: :thumbup:
Go to
Mar 30, 2013 02:01:45   #
Dryart38 wrote:
Subroto! Looks like your daughter has everything a girl could ask for, beauty, brains, love for animals, and a proud father! She has truly ARRIVED! Real nice photos!


Thanks for the warmth of your comments, Dryart38 ! Yes, God has indeed been kind and merciful. Now all we need is a groom :-) Unfortunately, she just doesn't seem to be able to connect with anyone in her age group, and in any case, she's always into art, books, animal welfare and what have you. Beautiful, brainy women have a rough time, I guess. She's so 'girl next door' but most men might find her a bit intimidating, dunno why ... :-(
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 196 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.