winterrose wrote:
You have just bought a new Merc, or a BMW.
Its state of the art, with every safety and driver oriented feature fitted to enhance the driving experience. You drive it around the block then you decide to heed the advice that you overheard from a couple of old timers.
These guys were seasoned drivers but they never saw much point in these newfangled auto transmissions and other useless stuff.
So you decide to take control because you can do better than the engineers. You begin by ripping out the fuel injection system, all it really does is to provide great reliability, instant starting under all conditions and vastly superior fuel economy. The twin OHC motor isnt needed so it goes as well then for good measure you chuck out the ABS, anti-skid protection and airbags, the power steering and the power brakes. Out goes the roll over protection, all the sound proofing material, the CD player, the electric windows, the heating and air conditioning and the luxury interior. On go the cross-ply tires and you swap those beautiful big disc brakes for wobbly old drums.
So now you are happy with your new flat headed V8, downdraught Stromberg carburetted, three speed, gas guzzling, noisy, hot in summer, cold in winter unreliable, uncomfortable lump which is all you need to get around, right?
I dont think so
So why, when there is all this massive technology available to enable them to make excellent images, do people keep wanting to make such a hash of things by insisting on shooting in manual?
I believe its smart to use all the tools in my tool box, and if my camera has certain capabilities, that is the very reason I chose to spend so much to buy the thing in the first place.
But then to choose not use those capabilities to their fullest?
I dont get it.
If its just an ego thing its rather self-destructive.
What do you think?
You have just bought a new Merc, or a BMW. br br... (
show quote)