Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: ltruex
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 23 next>>
Mar 12, 2012 10:56:04   #
Anotherview wrote: Mark II, it has one significant shortcoming that I've found. Its maximum flash sync speed goes to only 1/160 second (whereas the Rebel goes to 1/200 second). The higher sync speed corresponds to higher shutter speed for controlling ambient light and balancing it with the flash lighting. Shooters who use flash lighting will understand this difference and its potential limitation of effect.
If you are using the Canon speedlite you can set it to sync at anyspeed you set your camera for I cannot afford the top of the line light in fact it's two steps down, but I shoot at high speeds for fast moving subjects (well above 1/250 sec) and my flash captures images for me. Thought you might like to know that feature exists. L3
Go to
Mar 12, 2012 10:36:44   #
gekko11 wrote:
I used a 7d before upgrading to 5dmkII about a year ago, it was a big step up and worth every penny. If i thought I could get the the same kind of step up with the mkIII I would save my pennies and get it, I'm just not sure the price is justified . but i really want it anyway.
The Canon 5DMIII is not justifide for nearly 3.5K dollars since it offers little above the MII...I did'nt spend time on item for items specs list, so I could have missed something...But the MII aside from color issues that I hope will someday be addressed with a software upgrade is an awsome camera with features that are barely exceeded by the D's models, yet at a price much lower than D's. Wait to see if the price comes down to a level that is much more comfortable. Anyone that has a 5DMII (your model) can tell you they are not unhappy and the tent issue if known can be a work around on all but the most critical of issues...just don't shoot a landscape with excess of trees or you will see the tent in vivid details. You already have the best for the price in my opinion. L3
Go to
Mar 7, 2012 12:58:19   #
Ive owned the 5D and currently the 5DMII, for my use they are a good choice, but the software has some slight issues...red tinting could be an issue if true color is required in all works. So please research and apply to your needs. I don't hear issues of red tint with any Nikon products but price of lens etc...For the money the 5DMII is a real great camera and will do more than most at the price...Mind you this is my opinion only for what ever an opinion is worth. L3
Toni's Vision wrote:
I've been eyeing this camera from afar but I don't know anyone who owns one. Do any of you have any experience with this camera and what are your thoughts?

The 5D Mark III is out .. any thoughts about it versus the Mark II?
Go to
Mar 7, 2012 12:26:36   #
I originally had the 13x19 printer before the Pixma pro9000MII purchased new, but the motherboard quit and the model had been discontinued since my purchase. Canon replaced it with the Pixma Pro 9000 MkII and I feel the happier for the upgrade...Love that printer. Though Epsom is no dog and should be considered in high regard.
Kind regards L3
Go to
Mar 7, 2012 12:18:05   #
I agree this is the problem your dealing with not rust, but the suggestion I offered stands. L3
dirtpusher wrote:
salt not the real problem of holding it in place anymore. with Galvanic corrosion you are dealing with metal particales simular to what rust is on outside of metal bonding an binding the two different types of metal in the threads they have formed a bond. Galvanic corrosion (also known as bimetallic corrosion or dissimilar-metal corrosion it does it by it self over time but put water in the mix espically salty water thier almost welded. gonna take a solvent type break it loose now put coke an the like which is more water youre adden to the problem. if you wanna try an experiment buy some those fancy aluminum tire valve caps put them on those brass threads on valve stem an go drive on salty icy roads for a winter then try takin them off. wd 40 has a more oil base which will do its best to keep penetrates getting in till in gets washed off by the penetrate. beacue you have a bi-metal problem not anything like just rust. longer you wait worse it will get it's corroding
salt not the real problem of holding it in place a... (show quote)
Go to
Mar 7, 2012 12:14:21   #
I would suggest soaking in Diesle fuel, and it could take a day or longer to fully penetrate all the rust compoinents. Karosine is another deep penetrating product for rust related issues. I had been an auto tech for 12 years and that is what I know works. Kind regards L3
KG wrote:
I got some saltwater on my tripod head, and now the pin is stuck.

I tried submerging it into freshwater, but it's not helping.

The pin remains stuck. I'll try a few drops of oil when we get home (we are traveling), but as of right now there aren't any tools around I could use to fix the thing.

Any ideas?
Go to
Feb 20, 2012 16:04:34   #
Photogrl57 you out did yourself on this write up...really nice job...L3 :thumbup:
photogrl57 wrote:
LOL thanks. I did this in photoshop but it can also be done in Elements.
Open your photo... enhance in any way you normally would.
Then make 2 layer copies of it (ctrl/j).
Leave the bottom layer alone.
The middle layer ... in the layers pallette set the blending mode to screen.
The top layer .. go to the filters menu/blur/gaussian blur/ set to anywhere from 2-25 pixels. I only used 5.0 pixels on this.
Then in the layers pallette set the blending mode for the top layer to multiply.
Then go to the layers menu and flatten image or merge layers ... both do the same thing.
Go to the file menu /save as ... and ALWAYS name it something different from the original name... that way you will still have your original untouched.
LOL thanks. I did this in photoshop but it can als... (show quote)
Go to
Jan 31, 2012 06:29:18   #
I'm glad you liked the color, but for myself I actually don't, for they are too intense. These images are only to illustrate what may be hidden in a scene of night shooting...it really is not what is expected on averge, for the lens I used was too fast (f/1.4) so most of the shots were taken at ISO 50, f/16, and 1/5 second was as slow a setting I could collect or it was too light. I will take my macro lens out later (f/2.8) to see if I can get better effects. I don't have a zoom lens which would tend to work better since they are often slower lens. L3
joe west wrote:
nice colors, but 2 crazy for me....
Go to
Jan 30, 2012 13:34:37   #
There is a good chance they were PP and don't let it psyc you out...if it makes you feel your camera is not doing the job, go to a camera store and ask to take in store photos to compare your quality to the 5DII, and yes some difference will exist, but remember your camera don't cost $2k for a body, or there abouts. :-) L3
heliplot wrote:
I had the opportunity to shoot a table shot (shot of a table next to a window, silverware, white tablecloth, glass ware, candles, plates, saucers, greenery, etc, with my t3i, using a 50 1.4 lens the other day, tripod, a lot of time to do white balance and I shot 15 or 20 shots with different settings (ISO), (Fstop). and all my pictures came out very nice. At the same time, someone else shot the same scene with a 5dmkII, and some of the photos had a nice glow that none of my photos had. I realize that this is about 5% of the info needed to accurately determine a good reason for the difference. I guess my question is more general, and I cant send the two photos in question just yet, maybe in a few days... I think the 5d had a 50 1.8 lens (but I may be wrong). Those shots (5d) might have been run through pp prior to my seeing them, so that might be the answer. I did not do any touch-up with my t3i shots. My t3i shots were well lit, but were lacking that subtle (or not so subtle) glow that really made the 5d shot look good. Question, could the difference have been in the sensor size diff in the two cameras, or an ISO setting, or fstop setting, or a diff in pp. This is a crazy question to try and frame with typed words??? My question, what are the possible issues that caused the diff in the "glow" effect...lens?, settings? sensor size?, untrained photographer vs a trained one??? (I know the latter could be the answer)...thanks in advance for any thoughts.
I had the opportunity to shoot a table shot (shot ... (show quote)
Go to
Jan 30, 2012 13:23:07   #
Photogrl57 is that an Orton effect? like the looks L3.
photogrl57 wrote:
Welcome to day 30. Today I thought I'd try something different.... Frame within a Frame .... I've always loved shooting through trees .. never knew why .. as it turns out it's an actual part of composition.
Here are a few examples of a frame within a frame to get us started.
I look forward to seeing what y'all come up with :)
Go to
Jan 30, 2012 13:19:04   #
I'm glad you enjoyed the shots and hope you will give it a try when your a passenger with a camera...some shots will really surprise you and really be an eye opener...I lost some like that when I was in an earlier photo class now I'm starting a new collection. I showed these to prevent a new shooter from throwing away images in the belief they are junk...some are hidden and very small as shown on the shell logo. L3
sinatraman wrote:
very creative, my kind of abstractsd.
Go to
Jan 30, 2012 12:23:45   #
I have friends who ask about night shooting and have not had luck or perhaps thought they didn't have luck...I collected a couple of images that at a glance anyone would say no good nothing there...but I have enlarged some areas an tried a little touch up to see if it can have appeal...the first two images are as shot no alteration and last two show what is found. What do you think of night shooting hand held at 60 mph. You never know what you'll get some are just designs and others are both designs and matched words
Hope you like them and have fun taking your shots. L3








Go to
Jan 30, 2012 11:10:49   #
These days it's impossible to take a photo image that someone else has not taken from that same spot, angle and even the lighting...who knows how close you copy his works and may not even know you did a duplication of style or such. Atleast that is my excuse, and hello photogrl :-) L3
photogrl57 wrote:
That's what happens when you admit in open court to attempted recreation of someone's photo.
Go to
Jan 30, 2012 10:30:47   #
IN that case I was correct in my interpretation, and the hopes that law never becomes part of our system for it stops many commercial applications that in fact use techniques originated by someone else. L3
Roger Hicks wrote:
ltruex wrote:
I'm not concerned with comparing another case to the one stated as original post on this site...


In that case, you're not concerned with English law. Or any other.

Cheers,

R. (LL.B.)
Go to
Jan 29, 2012 12:45:33   #
Namwife I would like to add a comment on lens I suggest for your consideration...a manual camera shoot using manual lens like Ziess for example...they have a manual focus lens and to many that is a loss, for you don't have af appliction. But a manual use of the lens set for Hyperfocal range (selection of f/stop on infinity and read the range between that f/stop locaion you will have everything in focus (provided you don't shake the camera). This feature is not found on many auto lens or zooms, but are found on manual lens. These lens are exceptional with Portraiture work, but at a price. It is only something for you to add in knowledge and not something intended for a conflict. L3
Namwife wrote:
Does anyone know where to find the best on line tutorials on how to use manual mode? I shoot in P or S modes but I need to learn Manual....I would appreciate any help....
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 23 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.