Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: mostsports
Page: 1 2 3 4 next>>
Apr 19, 2024 21:40:17   #
It was a left turn on Bedford and a walk to Ebbets Field. Get in line for the cheap seats. Watch Dem Bums play like the champs they were. Carl was the last of the Boys of Summer.
Peace.
Go to
Apr 1, 2024 14:38:13   #
For many years, I have been using a powered 7 port hub from Star Tech. There has never been any issues.
There have been issues with USB powered multiple ports.
Go to
Mar 23, 2024 12:28:15   #
Will do, and thank you.
mostsports
Go to
Mar 22, 2024 13:06:22   #
black mamba wrote:
Thanks for the visit. I've never had that situation reported to me before. I'm glad it was helpful to you.

Tom


We wish to have a copy of the photo, but do not know how to request it from you.
Go to
Mar 20, 2024 22:59:58   #
The images enabled me to identify the auto in an old photo of my wife's ancestors. Thank you.
Go to
Mar 15, 2024 17:47:00   #
My daughter shoos with a Nikon D7500 and a bridge Nikon camera. Yesterday at the Dam she used a new Nikon long reach zoom to capture birds. It proved to be too heavy without a tripod, so it was back to the bridge camera with the long reach. As usual, it took very good images. Based on her many successes photographing birds in flight with the light weight bridge camera, I can highly recommend it.
Go to
Mar 6, 2024 14:29:54   #
thank you all for answering the interface question.
Go to
Mar 6, 2024 12:48:27   #
On a separate but related issue, I ask Trix if the Samsung T7 can interface with a USB 3.0 PORT.
Thank you.
Go to
Oct 11, 2023 22:56:14   #
A special thanks for sharing your great photos. We have a picture of an old auto with family that was taken in Detroit in the early 1900s. We tried to identify the auto, but had no success.
And there it is; your first image.
Thank you.
Go to
Aug 4, 2023 13:27:40   #
Late last year, I purchased a used 18-300 mm Nikon Lens. At the greater telephoto ranges, the results were rather poor and unacceptable for distribution. I returned the lens and received a refund.
Go to
Jul 19, 2023 21:11:40   #
dmeyer wrote:

Thank you. Your post gives me a lot to add to my understanding..
Is there a technical definition of "Invariant" in this discussion? If none, I understand non changing. Is not a 5 stop jump from 100= 3200, not 6400?
Go to
Jul 18, 2023 20:47:33   #
iN many sports flash is not allowed due to the distraction the light may cause.
Go to
Jul 18, 2023 17:38:59   #
SuperflyTNT wrote:
I’m still wondering where you got consensus that it’s better to process in camera.


Consensus of UHH answers in my previous post.Please note that some replies favored post processing.We may benefit from a thread discussion on this singular topic. I am not the one to start it.
Go to
Jul 18, 2023 12:45:40   #
TriX wrote:
It helps to understand what changing the ISO setting in the camera does. The signal that is acquired by the sensor is amplified (typically on the sensor) by a variable gain amplifier and then sent to the A/D to be digitized, and the goal is to use the entire dynamic range of the A/D without exceeding it. Once you’ve done everything you can to capture as much light/photons (per ChgCanon’s list), your next step is to raise the ISO. Raising the ISO beyond base does one of two things - it either raises the gain of the variable gain amplifier (increasing the signal to the A/D) or it multiplies the digital output of the A/D by a constant. The changeover in method typically occurs around ISO 1000-1200, but depends on the specific camera. The advantage of using as much of the variable gain amplifier’s increase as possible is that you maximize the D/R of the A/D. For example, if the light is so low that at base ISO, the signal is only large enough to use the first 4 bits of a 12 bit A/D, then the max DR will only be 4 bits/stops (it will actually be less due to various digitizer errors). On the other hand, if you dial in enough amplification to just set the most significant bit of the A/D, you’ll approach the full 12 bits of DR available. Once you pass the point of max amplifier gain, further increases in ISO simply multiply the digital output of the A/D by a constant. That can be done in camera or in PP - the operation is the same, but I’d contend it makes more sense to do it in camera, simply because you rarely know exactly where the transition between the method occurs.

In my opinion, the concept of always shooting at base ISO and fixing in post on so called ISO invarient cameras is a mistake for the reasons stated above. In the example, if you only have 4 bits of resolution/DR, multiplying that small digital value doesn’t magically replace the missing data - it may give you the same maximum value (brightness), but all those missing real data points are now at best, just interpolated points. There are also other factors at play including noise generated by the sensor and amplifier as well as quantization and linearity errors of the A/D, but using all the D/R of the A/D is critical. And by all means, use all the steps in Chg Canon’s list to increase the actual exposure/light captured by the sensor, which is the first priority.
It helps to understand what changing the ISO setti... (show quote)


Trix,et al, Thank you for the replies. They are useful to mitigate capture issues. Lots of study and experimentation ahead for me.Answer to a question:
My work is published in Results Books, newsletters, on web sites, in presentations and rarely, on the wall.
Go to
Jul 18, 2023 12:03:53   #
Thank you for your analysis. if the camera sensor does "heat up" in high ISO settings The increased luminescence would also also highlight noise. That effect would also occur in post processing. Good point.
In my work, over processed images are useless. Thus the importance of the image looking "natural", as he eye might perceive the action.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.