ORpilot wrote:
Thanks all you birders. We have several varieties of raptors and some are real hard to figure out like the Coppers Hawk vs Sharp Shinned hawk. PS.. I knew it wasn't a buzzard... They are all in Washington DC.
Hey ORpilot a few helpful hints for your field indent; all Red-tails and only Red-tails have a belly band.
Coopers wear a cap and their eyes are set forward in the skull (a line from the jaw to the top of the head will touch the eye)
Sharpies have square tails with very small white tips. Sharpies are hippies with the dark head color going down the nap of the neck. You tend to find sharpies in closer to the trunk of the tree and the Coopers out on a limb. Sharpies eyes are set further back in the skull. Hope this helps.
My PRO-100 uses 8 cartridges and none of them are "photo blue" , but does use two grays.
lilac wrote:
Very nice i feel u were lead there. And your car in the picture is the very reason i despise photoshop. Nice work.
It was a foggy morning when we spotted this site lilac, by the time the fog lifted the sun was wrong for the shot I envisioned. With any luck I will have another chance to capture the morning sun washing those stone walls.
speters wrote:
I wouldn't call it a abandoned dream, but a abandoned shack!
Someone put a lot of work into that dream, misguided as it might have been. This is earthquake country speters, and surprisingly it is still standing.
mjones540 wrote:
Thanks, but I'm not sure I can afford to upgrade right now.
But you would be rocking it if you could mjones540. I am sure an easy payment plan could be arranged.
dat2ra wrote:
Great treasure. I'd clone out the bright blue objects.
Or just park the car out of frame next time. I did not see my car when taking that picture dat2ra and I do not like the picture enough to spend the time. But the next time I will have the correct lens and remember not to park in the picture.
Curmudgeon wrote:
Nice find an great shot. If I were 25 years younger that place would hold real appeal
No bathroom or Kitchen might have put you off 25 years ago Curmudgeno. We looked around some and did not find a well, but they must have had water from somewhere to mix mortar.
Doddy wrote:
The second shot does it justice.
Hey if you own a convertible Doddy, the lack of a roof would not bother you. lol...
We took what should have been a short cut (added about an hour), and found this. It always turns out this way, paved road turns into a dirt road, (turn around she says, no its just a washout says I, it will be paved again)becomes a dirt track with no turnaround.
All it needs is a little TLC and this could be yours.
It just looked so intriguing I had to stop
(
Download)
might need a roof
(
Download)
The ponds are full of ducks and one of the most noticeable is the male Northern Shoveler. One of the least noticed is the female Northern Shovler, she just blends in. These ponds are on the golf course only available to photograph very early in the morning and at the end of the day.
The male moving from one dark area to an other
(
Download)
The male captured in a bit of sunlight,. Better, truer head color. Loss of detail due to noise reduction using CR.
(
Download)
the female hides in deep shadow and only draws attention when she moves to follow
(
Download)
part 1
yes
part 2
Bridge
Photoshop
Two cameras taking pictures of each other are said to be Juxtaposed, does that help?
Sidwalkadtronomy wrote:
Aren't computer prints different then photographic prints? Quality and longevity?
Dont know the differences. Thanks
???? If I understand your question, there is a quality difference between computer generated prints printed by general purpose printers and those printed by photo printers. If the question was referencing the difference between prints from film and prints from digital, there is a difference but which is better is questionable.
To your title question, my cost 8 1/2" x 11" printed with Canon pro 100 printer on Canon glossy paper, $1.80 per page.
19 x 13 for less than $3.00. Some papers are much more expensive than others and some inks can get really expensive.