Posts for: SoHillGuy
May 24, 2012 11:09:30 #
Age is just a number, but they sure add up. Welcome to UHH.
May 22, 2012 16:45:06 #
At this point I wouldn't want to take credit either.
May 22, 2012 13:16:23 #
May 21, 2012 21:44:06 #
Problem solved. On this occasion I found the opened photo's greyed out, as was the import button. It was then that I found in amongst the Mass of amount of photo's, they had already been imported previously. Darn the Dunce Hat fits so good.
SoHillGuy wrote:
I opened the folder to display the photo's but they failed to import. I will give it another try.
birdpix wrote:
If by "photos in files" you mean that the photos are in folders then you must open the folders so you can see the individual pictures (files) and import them. LR will not allow you to import a folder just the files inside the folder. All of this is available to you on the left hand panel on the import dialogue box.
May 21, 2012 21:30:33 #
I opened the folder to display the photo's but they failed to import. I will give it another try.
birdpix wrote:
If by "photos in files" you mean that the photos are in folders then you must open the folders so you can see the individual pictures (files) and import them. LR will not allow you to import a folder just the files inside the folder. All of this is available to you on the left hand panel on the import dialogue box.
May 21, 2012 19:54:20 #
I have not found how to import photo's located in FILES that are in Photoshop Bridge CS 5 into Lightroom 4.
Photo's that are not in FILES import just fine.
Now, that my hair is completely Grey, give me the simple answer.
Photo's that are not in FILES import just fine.
Now, that my hair is completely Grey, give me the simple answer.
May 21, 2012 11:41:22 #
I have an old Minolta X700. I really enjoyed having it, and it served me well. Hard to part with old friends, but times change. I now use a Canon 30D, and it is becoming a dinosaur in a manner of speaking. However it also serves me well, and has a lot of life left in it.
May 21, 2012 11:27:21 #
Regarding photo #1 Water scene, watch your horizontal and vertical composition. It could be corrected in post production, but then you may have to crop out some of the photo, what a loss that might be.
May 21, 2012 11:17:15 #
In addition to prior comments, I would use an ISO of 100 or 200 to reduce the noise. If this was not possible with the lens you used then a change in lens may have worked better, as I have the notion that the subject was not moving around quickly
I agree, that the original looked better than the post production.
I agree, that the original looked better than the post production.
May 21, 2012 10:54:46 #
quote=SoHillGuy]1 - 2 - 3 at the old ball game. It looks like the gal made the tag, but it could be called either way. I like all three of the shots.[/quote]
#1 looks like he's going to want some linament and Icy-Hot tonight! :shock:[/quote]
I wonder how high he bounced.
#1 looks like he's going to want some linament and Icy-Hot tonight! :shock:[/quote]
I wonder how high he bounced.
May 20, 2012 18:39:02 #
1 - 2 - 3 at the old ball game. It looks like the gal made the tag, but it could be called either way. I like all three of the shots.
May 19, 2012 19:30:01 #
Maybe just a bit more of the center structure at the top would have been nice. I like it regardless, as the structure seems to disappear in the dark sky.
I'll give it a 9.9
I'll give it a 9.9
May 19, 2012 19:19:32 #
This photo was taken with the Canon 18-55 f3.5 lens I spoke about.
Sperry Mill
May 19, 2012 17:53:54 #
I'm not familar with the kit lens that comes with the camera you are considering, however after reading Amazon's User reviews in regards to the Canon 18-55mm F3.5 lens, I purchased one. Yes it only costs around $118.00 but I am real happy with the results I have been getting with this lens. If I was involved in professional sales of photographs I would have gone with the best money could buy. I like to research lens reviews on Amazon, check out the reviews on the various lenses.
May 19, 2012 17:38:43 #
I'm sitting on the fence wondering if Canon will make a Canon 7D II. Many say no, but I feel they must have an upgrade to the 7D. If not they are missing the boat.