Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Revet
Page: <<prev 1 ... 73 74 75 76 77 next>>
Nov 25, 2014 06:42:52   #
mdorn wrote:
Was wondering... I use fill flash quite a bit outside, but my flash is always pointed directly at my subject. I've seen others pointing their flashes up into the air when outside for fill flash. I thought you'd only do that if there was something to bounce off of. Confused. Can someone set me straight? Thanks.


Last summer I was waiting to get into a restaurant in Savannah and I was able to watch a wedding party shoot outside. The photographer not only had his flash pointed upward, it was also facing about 20 degrees backwards. I did not see any modifiers or anything and nothing but blue sky to bounce it off of. I was hoping they would take a break so I could ask what he was doing but we were seated before I could ask. The only thing I could think of was he was keeping the flash in a ready storage position but the flash went off each time he took a shot. Anybody have any ideas on this???
Go to
Nov 25, 2014 06:34:53   #
Mogul wrote:
When I got my Nikon D3200, I wanted a flash, but all I could afford was a cheap "dedicated" flash from Walmart. It works OK, but sure eats a lot of batteries. Well, today, I figured it was time to clean out that box of junk I've had in my closet for the past 2½ years. I had just crammed it with "stuff" when my wife left and I had to move. In the middle of the box, I found a soft nylon case. When I opened it, I found an SB800 in like-new condition, complete with the fifth battery attachment and a packet of filters. I have downloaded the manual, and now have a lot of serious reading and testing ahead of me. The moral of this story:

CLEAN OUT YOUR CLOSETS!
When I got my Nikon D3200, I wanted a flash, but a... (show quote)


Great story but how did that flash get in your closet in the first place??
Go to
Nov 18, 2014 06:22:40   #
avemal wrote:
Need the right settings to take pix of my cat.
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Using Nikon 50mm prime or other suggestions.


LOL, Lets get real now. A cat can only be photographed when it wants to be photographed. The time, place, how, why etc. will always be decided by the cat!! We are just food machines supplying the true masters of the universe!!






Go to
Nov 18, 2014 05:54:05   #
Jim Bianco wrote:
Why buy an expensive camera if you are going to process them anyway,just buy a 300.00 camera you could make the pics just as good. Jim Bianco


When I started this hobby, I bought the Nikon D3100. I have used it for 3 years now and I have taken the advice of other Hogs and fellow Nikonites. I purchased better glass and fully learned that D3100 first even though I wanted to upgrade to a better body a couple months after I started. It has turned out to be good advise and I have gotten more reliable good photos instead of just the occasional lucky one.

Over the last year, however, there have been numerous occasions where I wish I had more features than the D3100 offers. Now I feel I am ready to move up to the D7100 (I actually purchased it yesterday but will not open the box until Christmas!!!!). No matter what camera or glass you have, I think it is good advise to learn how to get good pictures with the equipment you have before purchasing the higher end stuff thinking that would make you a better photographer (which it will if you are ready for it!!)
Go to
Nov 16, 2014 06:38:27   #
minniev wrote:
I had a similar problem with the last update. I'm no LR expert but what seemingly cured it was clearing both caches. It took way longer than I remembered it ever taking in the past but it has behaved normally since. Worth a try since clearing caches can't cause any trouble that I know of. I keep my cache size at 10 g now, which also seems to help. I've read recommendations for 20.


Problem solved, I cleared both caches and increased to cache size to 20. Just imported 50 photos in about 2 min or less. Thanks everyone!!!
Go to
Nov 16, 2014 05:16:19   #
ddetloff wrote:
Have you tried optimizing the catalog? I wonder if that might help.


I believe I optimize the catalog automatically when I back-up the catalog.
Go to
Nov 15, 2014 06:10:15   #
Ever since I downloaded the newest upgrade for Lightroom (now 5.6) my import speed is very slow. For example, yesterday I imported 60 Raw photos and it took over 4 hours. Prior to the 5.6 version is was much much quicker than this.
Does anyone have any suggestions on how to fix this issue???

Here is some info on the hardware and settings:

I do keep my photos on an external hard drive which is a USB-3 type. The hard drive is only 10% full.
My catalog is also on the same external hard drive
The computer is a Dell less than one year old. I can't remember all the parameters but it was a high end computer for Dell ($1400)
I import RAW photos from a Nikon D3100 and convert them to DNG format (no copies made)
I do create 1:1 previews but that is not the step that takes a long time (The 60 photos took about 10 mins to do 1:1 previews)
I do not create XMP sidecar files, all other metadata boxes are checked in the Catalog settings.
My cache size is 3 gigs, the catalog size is 17 gigs
Everything else is set as default Lightroom settings.

Thanks for any help

Read more: http://nikonites.com/computers-and-software/26863-slow-import-speed-lightroom-5-6-a.html#ixzz3J8OTLTg4
Go to
Nov 5, 2014 06:35:23   #
gemlenz wrote:
Thx for providing all that good info. I appreaciate it. I've heard a lot of good things about the Tamron 90mm f/2.8(VC version). Any thoughts on that one


I looked at both the 60 mm and 90 mm Non-VC versions a few years ago. I ended up purchasing and 60 mm because of the internal focusing of the 60mm which avoids extension of the lens when focusing. I used them both for a couple of days and compared photos. They both were 1:1 and pretty much produced identical photos. The 90 mm, however, did not give me more working room as expected because when the tube extended, it was pretty much the same distance away from a bug, flower, etc as the 60 mm. In addition, the 90 scared the insects away far more than the 60mm.

Now I see the 90 has all internal focusing plus VC. It should be a nice lens!!! I see it lists for almost twice what I paid for the 60 mm, so I don't feel so bad. The only problem I had with the Non VC versions of the 60 and 90 was that auto-focus was sometimes very slow. Manual is not a problem though. I usually use auto to get me close, then tweak with manual as I move in or out. It also is a great portrait lens. I'm sure you would be happy with the newer VC 90 mm lens.
Go to
Oct 15, 2014 06:40:16   #
willie35 wrote:
Have had this camera several years.
Had a serious focus problem using Auto.
Just started experimenting with all the other settings.
ISO, Aperture and speed settings.
Any hints, tips, beware's out there.
I am a long time 35mm SLR user and familiar with all camera terms.
Thanks


I have had a 3100 for 3 years and it has been very good to me. I am upgrading to the 7100 soon but to be honest, the 3100 takes great pictures. I have never had a problem focusing with any lens I have used with it but all the lens have motors in them. I did switch to back button focus a half a year ago, you might try that (assign the AE/AF button to the 5th or last option in the button function in the menu). I do seem to over-exposure everything with the 3100 in any mode but manual. Someone on here said they had better luck with center weighted vs. matrix metering. That helped me also. Set your focus mode on single servo so that it will beep when it locks. Then try focusing on things near and far away to make sure your lens is trying to focus (you should be able to hear and see it). You could also do this in the continuous servo mode but it will not beep when it locks. I am not an expert but if your lens isn't doing this, I would think it is a lens problem. If your lens is searching but can't find a focus, I would think it would be the 3100. Also, if your ambient light is low, the 3100 does struggle to find the correct focus at times.
Go to
Oct 12, 2014 05:49:31   #
colnago wrote:
I have been trying out a new B & W 3.0 ND filter (10 stop) on my D7100 with a Nikkor 17 to 55 2.8 lens. Exposure is not a problem but all the images have a strong red cast. I stacked three Tiffen ND filters on the same lens that equaled 9 stops and the White Balance is spot on. Camera was set the same for the ten stop and the stacked nine stop. If I hand hold the 10 up to a light it has a red cast. Markings on the ten stop: B & W 77 110 ND 3.0 10 BL 1000x E


I just purchased that exact filter last week from B&H. I did read reviews prior to purchasing it and they basically said it is an excellent filter but you do need to post-process in Lightroom (or other) to remove the red cast it will produce. Very easy to do in Lightroom.
Go to
Oct 12, 2014 05:46:15   #
Mohitt wrote:
Hi all you awesome people,

I am a newbie and about to purchase my first DSLR. I have finalised Canon EOS 1200D to be my first tool.

I wish to learn the basic features of a DSLR like exposure, appretaure, focus and other things.

Can anyone help me with some links to useful articles or thoughts of their own?

Thanks in anticipation,
Mohitt


I was in your shoes a little over a year ago. I got on Digital Photography Schools mailing list and started purchasing the E-books they have to offer. They are excellent for the beginner and up and are pretty cheap (especially when they have deals, which is quite often). You can go to the website and just order them. They also have a weekly newsletter which is very helpful to the beginner. Happy Shooting
Go to
Oct 6, 2014 06:36:54   #
jerryc41 wrote:
I used to be able to show a map with LR. Not now. I looked online for solutions, but found nothing that works. I don't have Norton, and I don't have a firewall. The last batch of pictures I took has GPS data imbedded, so I'd like to see that on a map.


I had this identical problem a year ago with Lightroom 5. I tried all sorts of things and nothing worked. It was a while ago but as I remember, it was a connection speed problem which was fixed by having ATT install a new modem. I also had to reinstall Windows at about the same time which might have been the fix but I am pretty sure it was the new modem that did the trick. Good Luck!!
Go to
Oct 3, 2014 06:14:00   #
GoofyNewfie wrote:
Good question. It has me questioning how I do it now.
Though the info may be a little dated, here is Neil VanNiekirk's take on it:
http://neilvn.com/tangents/nikon-flash-ttl-vs-ttl-bl/
Will have to read more when I get a chance.


Thanks, that is a good description of the two and when you would want to use one or the other. I wish you could pick which one you want and not have it dedicated by whether you use spot vs. center weighted or matrix.
Go to
Oct 3, 2014 06:00:17   #
viscountdriver wrote:
I know I will get replies telling me good Raw is, but, as a non-expert photographer with my new Nikon I find JPG Fine about as good as I need and easier to use.
No doubt experts will not use anything else but I bet the average Joe could not tell the difference and with modern edit programmes a huge amount can be done with JPG


I used to say exactly that because when printing or putting a photo on the web uses a jpeg in most cases, so why shoot in RAW. When I started getting more into Lightroom, I switched to RAW only very quickly. Working with jpeg vs. Raw files in Lightroom is a no-brainer with RAW files getting the nod everytime.
Go to
Oct 2, 2014 06:53:05   #
rpavich wrote:
The camera does all of the work.

Set the flash on TTL and it will do all of the work.

If you take a shot and the flash is too bright..turn the flash exposure compensation down a notch and try again.


I have found this technique very useful on my nikon D3100 with an SB-700 flash. For all you nikon people out there, can someone help with the TTL mode vs TTL-Balanced mode. I understand how to move between the two (spot focus for TTL, Center weighted or matrix for TTL-BL) but how does this apply to lets say fill flash in an outdoor setting. I have seen some posts before that some people use TTL-BL for outdoors and TTL for indoors. Does it need to be this complicated (I would rather use just one because I tend to forget to make the change) ?? Any advice on the Nikon system would be great. Sorry to sneak in on this post but it is very related to us Nikon users.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 73 74 75 76 77 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.