Chris T wrote:
Novicus ... please pardon me for saying so ... but NEITHER of your choices are so obvious to me ... where's the math to support them?
Lead Post: All answers are acceptable (other than the 8x10 view camera) - just be sure to add the appropriate math to come up with your choice - okay?
The Math : 8 x 10 = 4 x 5....When looking at the Specs. of said camera`s , it Clearly Shows that in order to Reach the Perfect Aspect ratio of 8 x 10 , the 4 x 5 Equals it in terms of Aspect ratio...the Aforementioned Camera`s Do exactly ThaT !! ...as they Use Less Pixels to Accomplish the Task , ( by Using a Smaller Sensor ).,...You are therefore shooting in a True Aspect Ratio of 8 x 10...( 4 x 5 ) , ...look at the specs. ,:...The Kodak 14N in FF has :Image sizes
(FX format) • 4256 x 2832 [L; 12.1 MP]
• 3184 x 2120 [M; 6.8 MP]
• 2128 x 1416 [S; 3.0 MP]
Image sizes
(DX format) • 2784 x 1848 [L; 5.1 MP]
• 2080 x 1384 [M; 2.9 MP]
• 1392 x 920 [S; 1.3 MP]]
Image sizes
(5:4 format) • 3552 x 2832 [L; 10.0 MP]
• 2656 x 2120 [M; 5.6 MP]
• 1776 x 1416 [S; 2.5 MP]
Image sizes
(1.2x format) • 3552 x 2362 [L; 8.4 MP]
• 2656 x 1776 [M; 4.7 MP]
• 1776 x 1184 [S; 2.1 MP]
In FX format : 12.1 MP ...
In 4 : 5 : 10.0 MP
This Clearly shows that the Sensor has Effectively become a 10 Mp sensor at Asp. Ratio 4 : 5 vs. an 12.1 Mp sensor at ( FF ) Asp. Ratio 2 : 3 , so You are shooting with a 4 : 5 camera instead of something else., resulting in More Pics. on the Memory card.
Do You have the " Golden Ratio " In MInd ?