I took Oceania. It's more expensive but I appreciated the smaller ship both for the service and the ability to dock in smaller ports. If you stop in Wrangell DO NOT MISS the Wild Bears of Anan. Look it up on Google. It's run by the US Forest Service and the number of daily visitors allowed is very limited, so BOOK EARLY. It's truly a once in a lifetime experience.

I took Oceania. More expensive but appreciated the smaller ship both for service and ability to dock in shallower ports. If you stop in Wrangell DO NOT MIISS the Wild Bears of Anan. Look it up on Google. It's run by the US Forest Service and only a limited number of visitors are allowed each day so BOOK EARLY. Truly a once in a lifetime experience.

Hello all. New to the forum. Let's say I take an image of an eagle with a 24 mp aps-c body and a 400mm lens. Then I take the same image with a 24 mp full frame body and the same lens. I now have two 24 mp images but the eagle appears larger in the aps-c image because of the crop factor. Now I can go into Lightroom and crop the full frame image to make the bird the same size but then I no longer have a 24 mp image because I have cropped some of the pixels out. Now let's say I want to crop both images and show only the head. Wouldn't I have better success with the aps-c image? And isn't that the whole point? Does this make sense or am I way off base?

Looking at the same lens myself. Initial You Tube reviews from Dustin Abbott look good. Should be all the reach I need with a cropped sensor. Thanks for the pics.

Homeowners policies generally do not cover liability for business pursuits without a special endorsement.

Excellent shots! Is that a Chickadee? Pictures were cropped I presume? What is focal length? Full frame or cropped sensor?